General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh, FFS! APNewsBreak: Trump's EPA moving to loosen radiation limits
WASHINGTON (AP) The Trump administration is quietly moving to weaken U.S. radiation regulations, turning to scientific outliers who argue that a bit of radiation damage is actually good for you like a little bit of sunlight.
The governments current, decades-old guidance says that any exposure to harmful radiation is a cancer risk. And critics say the proposed change could lead to higher levels of exposure for workers at nuclear installations and oil and gas drilling sites, medical workers doing X-rays and CT scans, people living next to Superfund sites and any members of the public who one day might find themselves exposed to a radiation release.
The Trump administration already has targeted a range of other regulations on toxins and pollutants, including coal power plant emissions and car exhaust, that it sees as costly and burdensome for businesses. Supporters of the EPAs new radiation guidance argue the governments current no-tolerance rule for radiation damage forces unnecessary spending for handling exposure in accidents, at nuclear plants, in medical centers and at other sites.
This would have a positive effect on human health as well as save billions and billions and billions of dollars, Edward Calabrese, a toxicologist at the University of Massachusetts, said in 2016. He was to be the lead witness at a congressional hearing Wednesday on EPAs push for what it calls transparency in science.The proposed rule would require regulators to consider various threshold models across the exposure range when it comes to dangerous substances.
https://apnews.com/6a573b6b020e453c90ecd5e84aa23f57?utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&__twitter_impression=true
awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)radiation, mercury and asbestos in your lives?
Wimps!! Don't knock it till you try it!
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)He must not give a crap about his grandchildren.
procon
(15,805 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)Ex-Koch engineer to lead EPA office on scientific research
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/409532-ex-koch-engineer-to-lead-epa-office-on-scientific-research
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)donkeypoofed
(2,187 posts)Then put those dumb bastards in a room with some and let's see how they like it. Somebody is lining their pockets over this !
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,436 posts)they won't be living anywhere near exposure to radiation. It's *good* for everybody else, though.
bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)anarch
(6,535 posts)So, yeah, it basically sounds like J. Frank Parnell from "Repo Man" is calling the shots at EPA these days...
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)angrychair
(8,733 posts)Helps you think...
These are the type of things that get at me more than some others. Junk science and the insistence to perpetuate things we know know not to be true.
Its like we are living in an alternate reality all of a sudden. Its like I went to sleep on Earth 1 on November 8 and woke up on Earth 1001 on November 9th.
Sometimes I just have to walk away from the internet and tune out and this is one of those times.