Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBrett Kavanaugh's anger may be backfiring
By Aaron Blake
October 3 at 6:00 AM
Brett M. Kavanaugh will still probably be confirmed to the Supreme Court. But its becoming increasingly clear that he damaged himself with last weeks angry appearance in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Appearing after Christine Blasey Ford, Kavanaugh traded his previously subdued, soft-spoken denials for something else entirely: a 45-minute conspiratorial broadside against Democrats a speech he said only one other person had reviewed. He then appeared to have a difficult time calming his nerves when senators began questioning him.
More than one pundit remarked at the time that Kavanaughs anger was probably calculated to reinforce his innocence and/or rally the conservative base. That may have been the aim, but the downside of that approach is becoming clear.
While Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) forced a delay specifically because of the allegations, he now says he is also quite concerned about the temperament Kavanaugh displayed in that hearing. Calling Kavanaughs display sharp and partisan, Flake said Tuesday, We cant have that on the court."
Neither of these concerns appeared in Flakes initial statement Friday announcing his support for Kavanaugh. Given a few days to process it, that appears to have entered his calculus in a very significant way and could loom large for a senator fond of highflying rhetoric about the importance of institutions.
And Flake isnt the only erstwhile Kavanaugh supporter balking at his display. Two of his Yale Law School classmates who previously expressed support withdrew it Tuesday. In doing so, they emphasized that their decision wasnt about Fords allegation, but rather about Kavanaughs testimony. In our view that testimony was partisan, and not judicious, and inconsistent with what we expect from a Justice of the Supreme Court, particularly when dealing with a coequal branch of government, Michael J. Proctor and Mark Osler wrote.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/03/brett-kavanaughs-anger-may-have-backfired/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1112 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brett Kavanaugh's anger may be backfiring (Original Post)
DonViejo
Oct 2018
OP
MagickMuffin
(15,952 posts)1. THIS: "In our view that testimony was partisan, and not judicious,
and inconsistent with what we expect from a Justice of the Supreme Court, particularly when dealing with a coequal branch of government, Michael J. Proctor and Mark Osler wrote.
Oh well Merrick Garland is probably shaking his head every day. What a freakin nightmare we are living in!
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)2. Oops. You mean judges should exhibit good judgment?
Who knew?