General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI wish there was Air America Radio
I miss Air America Radio
I know there is MSNBC but that is TV and many people don't get cable, including me. I used to tune in to AAR every day. It was so great to hear something counter to Rush and Hannity that was on the radio every day. Not only for myself, but for the millions of people out there who are just driving delivery trucks, or their cars and they are looking for something to listen to while they drive, work, ect. Today, those people spilling the dial will get right wing radio, or at best NPR which is not really liberal. I'm not bashing NPR, i love them. but talk radio is 100% right wing and it is having an affect on america. we need real liberal radio to counteract it.
It seems like it would just take a rich sponsor who cares about this country to get something like AAR going again. They could put Keith Olbermann, Al Franken, Young Turks, .... on there and would instantly have millions of listeners. I think it would make money, in today's world, people are hungry for liberal news. I know i am. If there was something I could listen to while at work, it would be on all day. I don't think i'm the only one who would.
I say bring it back! Any rich liberals out there listening?
manor321
(3,344 posts)I don't think radio is the future though. Younger people watch YouTube and listen to podcasts.
Regarding MSNBC, have you looked at any subscription "over the top" streaming services like YouTube TV, Sling TV etc.? They are paid services but they carry MSNBC. They don't have contracts so you can cancel any time.
I got rid of cable this summer and replaced it with YouTube TV. I don't watch much TV.
garybeck
(9,942 posts)i think people driving in cars will always listen to radio. and that's a lot of people.
and there is something different about a live stream like a radio station compared to podcasts. people tune in because they want to know what's happening NOW.
your point is well taken but radio will always be different because you can drive, work, cook, while you're listening and you don't have to pick a podcast, or click on anything, or look at a screen.
don't get me wrong, podcasts are great. in my fantasy of AAR coming back, there would be podcast archives of every show!
think about this.... the right wing would not be doing all that talk radio if it wasn't effective.
as far as sling goes, I do have Sling but the basic package doesn't include MSNBC.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)pick up our station online to listen in. Yeah I am not a big NPR fan and when I work out of town miss my local liberal stn
http://www.wcpt820.com
MurrayDelph
(5,300 posts)Not just the website, but I frequently listen to WCPT I my phone or tablet using the TuneIn app.
renate
(13,776 posts)Air America was smart but funny, as I recall. Right wing radio was and still is angry.
I dont know why anger is more appealing than humor for so many listeners, but maybe that was the problem.
I listened to AAR every time I was in the car, and might not have if it had been angry, but maybe that would be a way to appeal to a certain subset of listeners looking for an alternative to the right wing channels.
sweetloukillbot
(11,058 posts)Randi, Malloy, Ed Schultz, Janeane Garafolo...
Consequently the shows I liked the most were Franken, Lizz Winstead's show, Rachel, Sam Seder, and Marc Maron (although he was on so early I rarely got to listen).
We got a dose of Libertarian on Phoenix's as well (along with soon to be Senator Kyrsten Sinema).
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)I listen to the comedy station now, or occasionally sports talk ...
Progressive radio disappeared here in the past, but always came back ... been a couple years now ... and still nothing.
Pisses me off daily ...
BumRushDaShow
(129,339 posts)is that "we" (liberals/progressives) MISS getting our message out to the rural areas and cede it to the RW. These areas basically have NO internet outside of dial-up, may have some spotty cell coverage if they are lucky and have a house near a main highway with cell towers, and usually only get some TV reception via satellite (many cable companies refuse to run cables to them because it's not cost effective).
THIS is where the RW targets their venom - all through AM radio. AM radio has a coverage area of literally hundreds and hundreds of miles. Not even FM can do that (which only has an effective radius of about 50 - 60 miles max). And to boot, a number of these RW stations also offer some local programming to keep some of the lesser politically active listeners tuning in (car and home repair shows, managing money shows, sports talk, etc). The kicker here is that it is "free" (so they don't even have to pay for sat radio for example).
"We" whine about the people in the "rural" areas yet we dismiss the very means to reach them.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)which is just Sam Seder now. Mike and Bobby no longer contribute commentary.
You can still hear these people. It has never been as easy as hearing right wing.
Nicole Sandler is another good one, but I havent yet given her cash. Maybe I will now because I got rid of some dead weight contributing. She has Howie Klein every Thursday who tells you who the real Democrats are.
It might have been easier for a short time with AAR, but Ive been doing this almost 20 years. Nobody is going to pay for us to listen. There is no profit. We come from the PSA crowd when it actually existed. The truth is not an enterprise.
garybeck
(9,942 posts)that's my point.
i don't think people have to pay for us to listen. i think there needs to be an investor but it could make money.
but thanks for the tips. i do have an Echo so I probably could probably tune in there.
but really my point is not just about me. i can find whatever I want to listen to. it just bothers me that the radio is filled with rightwing lies all day long and there really isn't anything counteracting it.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)I need I check the website or remember from on air ads from sponsors
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Here on DU Id be told, in the times of AAR that it was a dead form of media. So I just listen and stay informed.
KWR65
(1,098 posts)i think you have the cart before the horse
a lot of people are right wingers because they listen to right wing radio. not the other way around
Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)The single best way to influence hearts and minds is to take back the media.
Other than Democracy Now and Thom Hartmann there are hardly any progressive radio news or news talk shows, and those aren't heard in many cities.
There is a "Tune In" app you can get on your phone that lets you listen live to any radio station you put in.
I host and produce a radio show on a local progressive station, low power FM, but with the app a lot more people can listen live even if they're in an area where reception is static. you can use your cell phone like a radio to hear stations all over the country.
We also post podcasts/audio of our show on our local news site ( a separate olnine news site run by a nonprofit media organization) which means many of our shows get thousands of listens, even the though station's actual signal is small.
BumRushDaShow
(129,339 posts)dem in texas
(2,674 posts)There's nothing like on the Radio now. I used to drive a lot and always listened to it.
pretzel4gore
(8,146 posts)Since the majority are leftwing, the fascist takeover of media says criminal schemers have been at work....which is necessary to fascist takeover! The criminals have taken over the judiciary now...
What next? The government ? Wall Street? Academia!
eShirl
(18,502 posts)I stream them on my computer, and also on their free Roku channel to my TV
https://freespeech.org/watch-live/
the Bill Press Show is coming up at 7am, and the Stephanie Miller Show comes on 9-noon
Locrian
(4,522 posts)Especially since it reaches precisely the type of person that needs to hear more progressive/liberal viewpoints.
Not everyone has cell phone, computer, podcast etc - the rural areas, south, workers listening to radio, etc - all GREAT ways to get the message across.
Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)the big donors were driven from the party which is a shame in many ways...not all moneyed folks are bad.
JHB
(37,161 posts)Big Democratic/liberal/lefty donors saying "we don't fund media" has been a problem for several decades now.
avebury
(10,952 posts)on the internet for free. Had I realized that there were those sites I would have ditched cable years earlier.
I do miss listening to Ron Reagan and Paul Bagala though.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)How would something like Air America stay in business if people look for a way to get around paying for it?
BumRushDaShow
(129,339 posts)The big donors should consider this "an investment" (long term) and should be prepared for extended "losses" although the term "losses" should actually be viewed as something along the line of "donations to pay for a 1-time TV ad during a campaign" (i.e., when you buy a TV ad, you are not doing that to "make money" ).
I posted this in an earlier thread about the Washington Times -
The Washington Times literally published (and continues to publish) AT A LOSS for over 30 years.
10/16/2015 08:27 am ET
After $1 Billion In Losses Over 33 Years, Washington Times Reaches Profitability
Washington Times
Some said it could never be done. Ever. But its done. The Washington Times announced Wednesday it achieved in September the first profitable month in its 33-year history, successfully transforming a traditional money-losing print publication into a leaner multimedia company with diverse revenue streams and a growing national audience.
The hard-working employees and patient owners of The Washington Times have waited for this day for a long time, President and CEO Larry Beasley said after surprising his staff Wednesday afternoon with an impromptu champagne celebration in the company ballroom.
The media landscape has been particularly unforgiving in recent years. Cutbacks, job losses and newspaper death watches have been the norm since 2009 as the Internet proved to be a profound game-changer in the news business. The Times went into reinvention mode, but never abandoned its original calling as a credible news source with a conservative backbone.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/after-1-billion-in-losses-over-33-years-washington-times-reaches-profitability_us_5620ec85e4b06462a13b95c6
Yet it continues to this day with the plan to spend billions more to keep the propaganda coming, and is oft-cited even here (until someone reminds the posters who what it is). It was one of the oldest "modern mainstream" RW newspapers (thanks to the head of the Moonies) since Murdoch bought the New York Post (and later the WSJ) to spew his propaganda.
What you are describing about the sentiment of the electorate who put these hateful people in office - it was as a result of a media feed with a little something called "brain-washing". A media that WE don't own, that pounded propaganda for 30 years after the elimination of the "Fairness Doctrine", and heralded what would be a persistent march towards complete deregulation of the broadcast industry, culminating in the most recent change, where one owner could buy multiple stations in the same media market with identical types of programming.
<...>
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=2173323
avebury
(10,952 posts)But when you consider the roll mainstream media played in putting Trump in the WH, I don't might finding free streaming sites.
garybeck
(9,942 posts)that is how this rightwing crap took off in the first place. Rush Limbaugh.
that's part of my point. it needs to be on the radio.
radio has business model that works. there's no reason it can't work for liberal content. over half the people in this country disagree with the direction the country is going. if there was a station to listen to that supported their ideas they would listen to it. businesses would advertise on it. that's how itworks.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)almost literally nobody listens to regular radio anymore. Its a dying medium. People dont accidentally stumble onto radio shows anymore because the radio in their car is bluetoothed to their phone playing music THEY choose or a podcast THEY choose, not what some faceless content programmer has decided they need to hear.
If a terrestrial audience existed for liberal talk it would be out there, but even here in deep blue SoCal all the talkers are rightwingers shouting at old people about the same shit theyve been on for thirty years. There is a niche audience on satellite, but thats a subscription model that is inherently self-selecting for people who want to listen to the radio.
Most people dont give a damn about the radio beyond its ability to interface with their other devices. The times, as a wise man once pointed out, they are a-changin.
MichMan
(11,959 posts)I mean if everyone else should do it for free, why not?
brooklynite
(94,684 posts)That'll encourage program production.
avebury
(10,952 posts)and I would pay for it if is was affordable. The MSM played a part in landing the country in the dire straits that it is in so I don't have any problem watching free live streaming.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)mucifer
(23,558 posts)http://www.wcpt820.com/weekend-schedule/
http://www.wcpt820.com/listen-live/
I still listen way too much in my car driving from house to house. I'm a nurse.
brooklynite
(94,684 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 9, 2018, 09:26 AM - Edit history (1)
Maybe liberals are different from conservatives and don't spend endless hours listening to radio shows that reinforce what they already believe.
I, for one, haven't listed to radio (terrestrial or satellite) in more than a year.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Reaching a geographically distributed audience (that spend a lot of time driving) using a small number of low power radio stations covering a large area.
In effect rural and exurban people. Probably men.
Its going to skew conservative by its nature as a medium.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)and then by people who didn't know what they were doing, and not because of a lack of an audience. And, if "liberals didn't listen to it", Rachel Maddow wouldn't have the most-watched cable news show, and Al Franken wouldn't have become a senator. Stephanie Miller and Thom Hartmann would not still be on the air. Randi Rhodes, Mark Maron, Sam Seder, Mike Malloy and others would not have enough of an audience to continue their podcasts. People are listening, and have been all along. Just not necessarily on the radio. And, many are like me. We don't have a liberal radio network in our area, so we stream it on our computers. I don't listen for endless hours, but I do listen to it.
brooklynite
(94,684 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)And, if that channel wasn't doing well, Sirus XM would have axed it by now. You said that people aren't listening to liberal talk radio. The ARE. Just not on terrestrial radio. They're getting it from other sources, including podcasts, which allow them to listen on their own terms.
Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)The local Air America station, KLSD station, had good listenership despite a weaker signal than right wing stations. It was booted off air by Clearchannel and replaced with a sports talk show that got far FEWER listeners than Air America's content drew.
It was not about listenership. It was about political censorship.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)And I'm driving all the time. My reason is that when I do, it is 50% commercials. Also being around politics 24/7 makes me want to tune out while driving (music only). My aux cord makes the radio unnecessary.
bunny planet
(10,875 posts)Sam Seder - 12 noon - 2:30 pm weekdays....fantastic http://majorityreportradio.com
and Randi has her own podcast....she is much better now that she is free of Clear Channel and corporate overlords
randirhodes.com live weekdays from 4-6 pm She's brilliant... once again keeps me sane like she used to do on AAR Both programs are available as podcasts too...I think Sam's show is $10. per month for the whole show, and Randi's is $7 or $10. a month, forget which. Both will work with folks who can't afford to pay that much and work something out. Both have tales to tell of just how dysfunctional AAR actually was, and they are both happier working for themselves with listener sponsored programming.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)because radio is primarily listened to by an aging demographic. Younger people consume their content digitally, streamed or downloaded to their devices.
Air America couldnt be sustained because liberals didnt tune in. Technological changes have only made it less sustainable in the ensuing decade.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Their first owners were crooks, and they sold it to people who had no idea what they were doing. But, I do agree with what you said about technological changes and demographics. Many of AAR's line-up are still out there talking to pretty decent-size audiences, however. A few of them are still on terrestrial radio, but they're also being streamed on satellite and on Free Speech TV. The rest are all doing podcasts, or they're Rachel Maddow and have a TV show.
garybeck
(9,942 posts)that right wing radio also reaches many people who are not already rightwingers, and if you even accidentally tune in, after just a few minutes you will be out in the streets with a pitchfork.
i know, yes, some people are already inclined to be rightwingers. but the truth is that most of the people in the country tend to be centrists. they/we care about the same things. people are swayed by radio. that's why rightwing puts it there. to brainwash people with lies and to get them riled up.
if there was another station on the dial, that people could accidentally tune in to, to get them riled up about things, based on truth instead of lies, it would be helpful. it would change some people's minds.
there's a reason the right wing does it. it's not just to give people what they already want. it's to sway people and pull people in.
that's what we need.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)As for radio, only a small portion of the country even listens to it. The top 3 biggest audiences go to NPR programming. They get 14.6-14.9 million listeners per WEEK each. Not per day. This is in a country of over 350 million. Most people are not going to stumble on Rush Limbaugh's show, because they're not even listening to the radio, let alone flipping through the dial. The people who listen to him now are what's left of his audience from years ago. Many of the other right wing talkers have shows on Fox. That's where their audiences come from, not from people who stumble on them.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Younger urban people are not going to listen to talk radio.
YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)Killing that was one of Reagans worst actions.
It made hate radio possible.
garybeck
(9,942 posts)byronius
(7,398 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)byronius
(7,398 posts)budkin
(6,713 posts)It's crazy how big he's gotten since the AA days.
rurallib
(62,433 posts)one upstairs, one downstairs. They get gobs of radio around the world. The top button on both is KTNF in Minneapolis (St. Louis Park actually) Stephanie Miller, Thom Hartmann, Norman Goldman
Plus you can get radio from around the world and a bunch of other stuff.
2) Sirius - you can get a relatively cheap subscription - channel 127 is much like the old Air America.
3) the aforementioned Free Speech TV. Get it on your computer at https://freespeech.org/watch-live/ totally free.
I know quite well that we seem to ignore the power of radio. I spent a couple of years trying to get some interest in liberal radio and no one would join me.
WCPT in Chicago and KTNF in Minneapolis are both online as are several podcasts.
I seldom listen to NPR any more. They seem to be another wing of Koch Industries these days.
garybeck
(9,942 posts)right wing radio also reaches many people who are not already rightwingers. if you even accidentally tune in, after just a few minutes you will be out in the streets with a pitchfork.
i know, yes, some people are already inclined to be rightwingers. but the truth is that most of the people in the country tend to be centrists. they/we care about the same things. people are swayed by radio. that's why rightwing puts it there. to brainwash people with lies and to get them riled up.
if there was another station on the dial, that people could accidentally tune in to, to get them riled up about things, based on truth instead of lies, it would be helpful. it would change some people's minds.
there's a reason the right wing does it. it's not just to give people what they already want. it's to sway people and pull people in.
think about it. i bet you know people who are republican, but they're not racist. they're not assholes. they care about stuff. but they have been sucked into a world of lies, where global warming is a hoax and immigrants are taking our jobs and democrats just want to raise taxes. their thoughts and actions are based on lies. they are good people.
many of these people got started by listening to Rush Limbaugh years ago. when they get in the car they still listen to that and when they get home they turn on fox news.
the left is doing very little to counteract this, even though in most cases the truth is on our side.
when you can turn the AM radio dial and hear 4 different assholes demonizing liberals and ranting about something that isn't true, it has an affect. people hear that and nothing else. they think it must be true. why would some guy be on the radio saying it if it weren't true?
if there were some stations that spoke the truth with a similar format, it would suck some good hearted people in the other direction.
that's what we need.
byronius
(7,398 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)you can normally get some pretty good deals for it - $5 to $6/month for 6 months to a year. They have Stephanie Miller on later in the morning (East Coast time), Thom Harttman, Michelangelo Signorelli, Dean Obedallah (sp?) and others. Limited programming on weekends, unfortunately.
byronius
(7,398 posts)I miss the Al Franken show. That was American art.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)dem4decades
(11,301 posts)And you listen when you want.
CrispyQ
(36,493 posts)And when I say left, I mean the Democratic party. They just gave up the narrative in rural America. My rwnj cousins all listen to hate radio. They spew all the talking points. People will argue, "they wouldn't listen to AAR anyway" & maybe they wouldn't, but some would & some would start to question their worldview. Instead, we just wrote them off without even an effort to talk to them. Now they've had 35 years of brainwashing & you can see it in their kids, too. With less spent on education than before, reversing this is going to be even tougher.
I think of that rich guy spending all that money on that stupid impeachment campaign & I'm like WTF?