Public sectors.

Oh and breaks rules if it suits him.

Just what we need.

for buying into the RW idea that running a company is comparable to or appropriate for running a government.

You do "get" the two are antithetical, right? One seeks to maximize prices to the "consumer" while minimizing costs to the seller/provider while the other seeks to maximize services while minimizing costs. You do see the difference, right? Right?

And another thing: why would you assume my differentiating between Avenatti and Bloomberg purely on the subject of party affiliation is an endorsement of Avenatti for president? We have a LOT of good candidates; I don't consider Bloomberg one of them as a bona fide member of the party or anything else.

Finally, I for one don't want a billionaire--even a real one--running my party or my government. I'll go further and say I don't think billionaires should exist, at all. What do we want or need them for anyway?
Job creation?

...

including strict gun control, strong pro-choice and lgbt advocate, even went as fat as implementing soda tax which is a very liberal position. I’ll support a candidate who has the best chance of winning, the time for purity tests is long gone.

Fuck that authoritarian piece of shit.

https://www.nyclu.org/en/stop-and-frisk-data

In 2011, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 685,724 times.
605,328 were totally innocent (88 percent).
350,743 were black (53 percent).
223,740 were Latino (34 percent).
61,805 were white (9 percent).
341,581 were aged 14-24 (51 percent).

He is a Democrat again...

I feel better already

This is big. I almost thought it was "fake news."

Maybe Nikki Haley will join him! I don't know how she could stand being part of the Trump crew as long as she did.

I sure hope so.

Every bit helps!