Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yortsed snacilbuper

(7,939 posts)
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 05:37 PM Oct 2018

Roberts refers judicial misconduct complaints against Kavanaugh to federal appeals court in Colorado

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Wednesday referred more than a dozen judicial misconduct complaints filed recently against Brett M. Kavanaugh to a federal appeals court in Colorado.

The 15 complaints, related to statements Kavanaugh made during his Senate confirmation hearings, were initially filed with the federal appeals court in Washington, where Kavanaugh served for the last 12 years before his confirmation Saturday to the Supreme Court.

A judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit had asked Roberts to refer the filings to another appeals court for review after determining that they should not be handled by judges who served with Kavanaugh on the appellate court.

In a letter Wednesday to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, Roberts said he had selected the court in Colorado to “accept the transfer and to exercise the powers of a judicial council with respect to the identified complaints and any pending or new complaints relating to the same subject matter.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/roberts-refers-judicial-misconduct-complaints-against-kavanaugh-to-federal-appeals-court-in-colorado/ar-BBOcS2q?ocid=spartanntp

What comes arouind, goes around.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Roberts refers judicial misconduct complaints against Kavanaugh to federal appeals court in Colorado (Original Post) yortsed snacilbuper Oct 2018 OP
It won't go anywhere manor321 Oct 2018 #1
We'll probably never know FBaggins Oct 2018 #2
I'm of the mind that Roberts would not have transferred judicial misconduct complaints asiliveandbreathe Oct 2018 #3
Agreed Sherman A1 Oct 2018 #4
"for the purpose of doing nothing" Duppers Oct 2018 #5
I didn't say that.... asiliveandbreathe Oct 2018 #6
Thank you! Duppers Oct 2018 #7
 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
1. It won't go anywhere
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 05:45 PM
Oct 2018

Supreme Court Justices are not just any position.

I'm in favor of getting this info out there, but impeachment is the only way to remove these judges.

FBaggins

(26,740 posts)
2. We'll probably never know
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 06:03 PM
Oct 2018

I think it’s all confidential past this point.

Interesting to imagine how it plays out from here... since he literally sits in judgement of their decisions from here on out.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
3. I'm of the mind that Roberts would not have transferred judicial misconduct complaints
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 06:31 PM
Oct 2018

on kavboy, or any other judicial misconduct complaint regarding other judges, to the 10th circuit - for the purpose of doing nothing....The Breyer Report identified the process...."to exercise the powers of a judicial council" - amended 9/17/2015


http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-conduct-disability/archives-committee-judicial-conduct-and-disability


In 2008, the Judicial Conference adopted the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, providing mandatory and nationally uniform provisions governing conduct and disability proceedings.

The Judicial Conference amended the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings on September 17, 2015. The Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, as amended on September 17, 2015, are currently in effect.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
4. Agreed
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 07:09 PM
Oct 2018

It appears that he is at least going through the process and attempting to look fair minded in this issue. It is entirely possible that Roberts may not be all that thrilled with the newest member of his court and want to follow up on these and any future complaints in a proper manner.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
6. I didn't say that....
Thu Oct 11, 2018, 06:26 PM
Oct 2018

I'm of the mind that Roberts, would not have transferred judicial misconduct complaints

on kavboy, or any other judicial misconduct complaint regarding other judges, to the 10th circuit - for the purpose of doing nothing...

Maybe the comma after Roberts is missing...I fixed it....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Roberts refers judicial m...