It’s amazing what having no conscience frees one to do.

is that they have made a science of hiding atrocities built on many centuries of crimes against humanity. This is the same reason we will never know for sure the extent of Russian involvement in our elections.

While physical evidence of a murder may be found, it’s a certainty that all communications and electronic evidence trails have been wiped clean. In this particular case, the perpetrators did not plan on the victim wearing his Apple Watch, which transmitted audio of his murder. Even so, an audio recording is unlikely to convict individual people, particularly since they are being shielded by the royal family.

Made it be known
To SA
do what you gotta do.
The US will stand down.
They all knew.
We will find out.
19 days.

His ambivalence after the fact of the murder is the tell.

the ultimate goal is to have certain intelligence agencies in certain countries ( Russia, Saudi, Philippines, etc ) start taking out AMERICAN journalists who criticize Trump and / or other totalitarian states.

Just fill up the cargo hold, buy her a couple of new coats with graffiti on the back, and send her off to distant parts for GOODWILL.

Do bears shit in the woods? Is the GOP the most corrupt party to ever exist in this country?

They also should be calling him out when he tells his lies instead of letting him get away with it.

[link:https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/16/trumps-attacks-on-the-press-are-illegal-were-suing-221

312|


Coalition of Free Press Advocates Taking On Trump

From the article........

Others in the media cannot help but take notice that an angry president may strike back. When we have consulted our members, writers and journalists working across the U.S., they have told us they take into account in their writing that criticism of the administration might put them at risk. Many media outlets and correspondents are pressing forward fearlessly, making this a heyday for certain types of hard-hitting coverage. But individual writers, especially without the protection of a big media company, may think twice before publishing pieces that could land them in the White House’s crosshairs. Moreover, while intrepid journalists may be willing to work under threat from the highest levels of their government, here in the United States they should never have to.

Curtailing the president’s violations of the First Amendment is unlikely to halt some of its most dangerous ripple effects. The last few months have brought violent attacks on journalists, some clearly inspired by the president’s invective. In August a man was arrested for threatening to murder Boston Globe journalists parroted the president’s “enemy of the people” language. White House radio reporter April Ryan, the New York Times’ Bret Stephens, CNN’s Andrew Kaczynzki and others have received death threats.

President Trump’s tirades against the press are by now routine, and may seem to fit right in with our no-holds-barred culture of polarized punditry and bluster. But the president of the United States isn’t just another talking head. It is vital that courts weigh in to underscore that no matter what a given president may think and say, a free press is an essential pillar of our democracy. A court could affirm that by reminding President Trump that his freedom of speech does not extend to threatening to use the powers of his office against the press.

Our news media is right to keep their heads down, ignore the insults and remain focused on journalism. But that shouldn’t mean the president’s First Amendment violations go unchallenged. It is up to those of us who depend upon a free press to rise in defense of it.

I would include non citizens living in our country as well.

"It is up to those of us who depend upon a free press to rise in defense of it."

see FB page "People's Bill Of Rights For White House Transparency"

talking about the multi billion $$$$ deal between trump and Saudi's. Hell I wouldn't be surprised if ol' Trumplethinskin ordered the hit.