General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsiPads in the classroom raise math scores 49%
Weve all heard how using an iPad in the classroom improves a childs literacy scores and now a new study is showing the same is true for math students as well.
App developer YourTeacher teamed up with KIPP Academy to test grade 8 students to see if their scores would improve after using an iPad. Students were provided with an iPad and the Algebra 1 iBook, available on iBookstore, to replace the traditional textbook.
The program is referred to as a flipped classroom 80% of the iPad usage was outside the classroom, allowing teachers to focus on more advanced training and one-on-one help in the classroom. The students were then tested using the KIPP Spring Common Assessment Test. The scores were compared to the students who didnt have access to an iPad and the results speak for themselves.
Overall, the percentage of students who rated either proficient or advanced (the passing rate) was 49% percent higher in the flipped classrooms using the iPads than in the traditional classrooms with no iPads, according to the report. The difference was most pronounced in the percentage of students rated as advanced, which was 150% higher in the flipped classrooms.
http://www.loopinsight.com/2012/08/13/ipads-in-the-classroom-raise-math-scores-49
Igel
(35,350 posts)Actually, in some ways my classrooms back in the '60s and '70s were "flipped" using those clever data packages called "books."
We'd read the content at home and then in class practice it. Imagine that. And if you flip your classroom then, well, you get the content at home and then practice it in class. (Obviously they're completely different things
Some of it is novelty. Some of it is doing the hand-holding in a slightly different place in the lesson cycle.
FSogol
(45,524 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)would also believe that changing delivery media dramatically increases short-term achievement.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,846 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)seen years of bullshit research hyped to the skies when it first comes out & "oops, sorry" sometime later when they get what they want.
spin
(17,493 posts)
In modern usage, "Luddite" is a term describing those opposed to industrialisation, automation, computerisation or new technologies in general.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite
It could be argued that as our technology advances it eliminates many good paying and rewarding jobs.
NEW TECHNOLOGY AND THE END OF JOBS
Jeremy Rifkin
A technology revolution is fast replacing human beings with machines in virtually every sector and industry in the global economy. Already, millions of workers have been permanently eliminated from the economic process, and whole work categories and job assignments have shrunk, been restructured, or disappeared. Global unemployment has now reached its highest level since the great depression of the 1930s. More than 800 million human beings are now unemployed or underemployed in the world. That figure is likely to rise sharply between now and the turn of the century as millions of new entrants into the workforce find themselves without jobs.
Corporate leaders and mainstream economists tell us that the rising unemployment figures represent short-term "adjustments" to powerful market-driven forces that are speeding the global economy in a new direction. They hold out the promise of an exciting new world of high-tech automated production, booming global commerce, and unprecedented material abundance. Millions of working people remain sceptical. In the United States, Fortune magazine found that corporations are eliminating more than 2 million jobs annually. While some new jobs are being created in the US economy, they are in the low-paying sectors and are usually temporary.
This pattern is occurring throughout the industrialised world. Even developing nations are facing increasing technological unemployment as transnational companies build state-of-the-art high-tech production facilities, letting go millions of cheap labourers who can no longer compete with the cost efficiency, quality control, and speed of delivery achieved by automated manufacturing.
With current surveys showing that less than five percent of companies around the world have even begun the transition to the new machine culture, massive unemployment of a kind never before experienced seems all but inevitable in the coming decades. Reflecting on the significance of the transition taking place, the distinguished Nobel laureate economist Wasilly Leontief warned that with the introduction of increasingly sophisticated computers, "The role of humans as the most important factor of production is bound to diminish in the same way that the role of horses in agricultural production was first diminished and then eliminated by the introduction of tractors."
http://www.converge.org.nz/pirm/nutech.htm
I remember many years ago opposing outsourcing of American jobs overseas. At that time I was accused of being a Luddite.
I can see a day in the future where technology replaces hamburger flippers in fast food restaurants. Today many college graduates end up working in such jobs as they are all that is available.
Obviously we need to insure that all of our students are as well educated as possible to find jobs in our current ecomony. Modern technology can be utilized to optimize the educational experience. Many high school students love computers and are very computer literate but find school boring. Disciple is lacking in many high schools and that makes learning difficult even for the brightest. If we develop educational computer programs this would allow students to learn at their own pace and the teacher would be far more able to help those who have difficultly.
I used to watch my grandsons play World of Warcraft. It was largely a violent computer game but also taught economics to a small extent. I began to realize that computer programs could be written by game developers to teach history and other subjects. Imagine studying Roman history and being able to enter a computer generated game set in the times of Julius Caesar. You would able to wander the streets of ancient Rome and interact with the computer generated residents of the time. You would learn how people actually lived at the time. It would be a far more educational and rewarding experience than reading about those times in a history book or listening to a history teacher.
I'm not a fan of violent computer games. I enjoy playing games such as SimCity in which you develop and manage a city. It's not an easy task. You do learn a lot about the problems encountered by city planners.
Technology has significant advantages but also significant disadvantages. Nuclear power is one example. It is not always foolish to fear technology.
spin
(17,493 posts)About Blackboards - Blackboard Technology and Chalkboard History Advances
- Chalkboard education goes back to 1801 long before whiteboards & corkboards were in existence
The blackboard revolutionized education. In our present age of continually evolving desktop, laptop and palm computers, photocopy equipment, PowerPoint presentations, video displays, interactive whiteboards, and internet access, it's startling to realize that the "technology" to first influence education was the invention of these black slate writing boards (also known as chalkboards).
Teaching could be a tedious and challenging business for American teachers before the chalkboard was a teaching tool. Whether they were in eastern academies or schoolrooms on the prairies, prior to 1801, teachers and schools had no means of visually presenting information to a roomful of students all at once, no means of presenting large concept and historical overviews for the entire class to view, grasp and discuss.
Blackboards, easels, corkboards and contemporary whiteboards may seem to us to have always been standard equipment in schoolrooms as well as business boardrooms, but none of these basic tools even existed in classrooms prior to 1801.
***snip***
Students sat in schoolrooms with handheld slates upon which to write assignments. These were usually made of a wood board painted over with black grit, though some were made of porcelain imported from the United Kingdom. Teachers would then have to go from student to student copying, for example, a math problem onto each student's individual slate. Some weren't so fortunate. ...
http://www.ergoindemand.com/about_chalkboards.htm
If a person time traveled to our day from the early 1900s he would be absolutely amazed at the technology in the current world. However if he was shown a school classroom might wonder why we haven't better used our advancements to educate our youth.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)At how much education has changed. The techniques and curriculum have changed exponentially. Some of the technology may seem familiar, but there is a reason that wheels are still in use -- there's nothing wrong with the technology.
spin
(17,493 posts)That was before the advent of the internet and personal computers.
Since the mid-1990s the Internet has had a tremendous impact on culture and commerce, including the rise of near instant communication by email, instant messaging, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) "phone calls", two-way interactive video calls, and the World Wide Web[21] with its discussion forums, blogs, social networking, and online shopping sites. Increasing amounts of data are transmitted at higher and higher speeds over fiber optic networks operating at 1-Gbit/s, 10-Gbit/s, or more. The Internet continues to grow, driven by ever greater amounts of online information and knowledge, commerce, entertainment and social networking.[22]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet#History
I'm not suggesting eliminating teachers. I'm just suggesting using technology more efficiently to aid teachers.
Obviously our educational system has problems.
Published Online: June 2, 2010
Published in Print: June 10, 2010, as Progress Postponed
U.S. Graduation Rate Continues Decline
Graduation Rate Continues Decline
By Christopher B. Swanson
Every school day, more than 7,200 students fall through the cracks of America's public high schools. Three out of every 10 members of this years graduating class, 1.3 million students in all, will fail to graduate with a diploma. The effects of this graduation crisis fall disproportionately on the nations most vulnerable youths and communities. A majority of nongraduates are members of historically disadvantaged minorities and other educationally underserved groups. They are more likely to attend school in large, urban districts. And they come disproportionately from communities challenged by severe poverty and economic hardship.
According to the Editorial Projects in Education Research Centers latest analysis of high school completion, the national graduation rate stands at 68.8 percent for the class of 2007, the most recent year for which data are available. This represents a slight drop, four-tenths of a percentage point, from 69.2 percent for the previous high school class.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/06/10/34swanson.h29.html
Graduation Rates Increase Around The Globe As U.S. Plateaus
Other countries have pulled ahead, and the U.S. falls behind
By: Kavitha Cardoza // February 21, 2012
More than at any other time, getting a good job requires a strong education, especially in a global market. But in international rankings of high school graduation, the U.S. is near the bottom of the list of developed countries. It's a statistic that has not gone unnoticed by educators and policymakers at the highest levels, and many of them are now looking to other countries to see where American schools can improve.
In 2009, President Obama spoke to students at Wakefield High School in Arlington, carrying a strong message: dropping out is not patriotic.
"If you quit on school, you're not just quitting on yourself, you're quitting on your country," he said.
The president has said other countries were "out-educating us." It seems they're also out-graduating us.
http://wamu.org/news/morning_edition/12/02/21/graduation_rates_increase_around_the_globe_as_us_plateaus
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Yavin4
(35,445 posts)didn't have IPads in their classrooms when they were kids. They didn't even have personal computers nor calculators.
edhopper
(33,606 posts)Hawthorne Effect?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)"Ipad users scores increase" Correlation is not cause.
2on2u
(1,843 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Yup yup!
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Because I've seen schools and classes issued iPads. Happened over the last couple of years in my district. Many are stolen or broken within weeks; virtually all of them are jail broken within days to become game/porn machines. Math scores have gone up, but no moreso than at the school I teach at, which has no iPads (though we do have smart boards, which are very cool). Most of our rise at the secondary level, I believe, is the trickle down effect of a renewed emphasis in the primary grades, plus new techniques/emphasis/curriculum at the secondary level.
And I have never, not once, seen a charter/private/profit based school self report a negative outcome, so the fact that Kipp schools reported this stinks to high heaven.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Things have changed a lot. I remember when calculators became available cheap. I was the first one to have one and it was banned on tests which was probably a good idea. They finally allowed their use during trig and geometry. Now they let you use an IPAD, progress!
Granted, I have yet to see a normal program that can solve the quadratic formula or multiply them but I'm know they're available. The only reason they let us use them in advanced math was they figured we'd already mastered things that were rote learning like the multiplication tables and FOIL.
This seems like an excellent use. The math textbook is on the IPAD, I wonder if the school provides the IPAD and do they restrict the apps they can use?
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)would raise test scores
eppur_se_muova
(36,281 posts)American students in experimental programs involving new alphabets and instruction in Japanese also showed better scores. Basically, any form of "special" attention seems to bring out better performance in students. Obviously expensive electronic whiffle giddies for each student should be particularly potent in this regard.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)Small sample, charter school, sounds like a rigged study to me.
surrealAmerican
(11,363 posts)... this is a pretty solid case against whatever non-iPad method they've been using. If only about 1/3 of your students wind up "proficient" or better, that system's a failure. Actually the iPad method only leaves a little over half the students "proficient", which is not exactly encouraging either.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)He really did change the paradigm
spanone
(135,863 posts)LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Since there was no control and several factors were adjusted (instructional method, use of classroom time, text, iPads) the use of the iPad can't be identified as a factor in the improvement. I'd also like to see progress measured by a third party test. KIPP's school, text and test... I think we can all see how easy it would be to game the results.
I wouldn't be surprised if a tablet-based text was useful- you could do stuff for different learning styles that a book can't, for one thing- but I don't think this study is designed in such a way that it proves anything, except that KIPP can't or won't design a useful study.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)will tell you all the things wrong with KIPP Academy and the "study."
Legitimate academic reviews are done by outside independent contractors which are meant to ensure fair evaluation. They require years of data-gathering in order to establish legitimate trends.
One last thing, take a look at the "About" page. I'm seeing a HUGE conflict of interest here.
Marr
(20,317 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Or, maybe, it really is a Cult Food.