Today (or at least by the end of the week.)

I'll be passing this one around and getting more vocal opposition to HR 1433.

Thanks for this thread!

eminent domain.

Then let them argue that the government has no hand in a business's success.

The Randians should also be educated concerning eminent domain and the railroad industry.

Unless she can appeal all the way to the scotus and they decide to make new law

They can force the abandoning of current laws, but the Congress has to get involved and put together new legislation.

to describe the effects of appeals court decisions - see the effect of Citizens United.

And on the issue of eminent domain the precedent is solid.

I thought the remark I first responded to was from someone unfamiliar with law - and it could be you know far more than I do.

Freaking Republicans and their Grabby Greedhead Values

Last edited Wed Aug 15, 2012, 05:10 AM - Edit history (1)

concerning the woman in New England attempting to save her property from a tennis club (or some such,) I am sad to report that the Republican Justices were actually more supportive of the right of the individual to hold onto their legally gotten property. They have also been more supportive of medical marijuana and states' rights to allow for medical marijuana.

And don't forget, it was Hillary Clinton's State Department that initially gave the green light to the Keystone XL pipeline. The only thing that stopped the pipeline is the thousands of activists that basically put their lives on hold to protest it.