Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 10:25 PM Jan 2012

Iowans Collected More Federal Benefits Than They Paid In Federal Taxes

Iowans Collected More Federal Benefits Than They Paid In Federal Taxes

By Pat Garofalo

The Iowa caucus officially takes place tonight, followed by the New Hampshire primary next week, the first two steps in the GOP’s selection of a presidential candidate. While the Republican candidates have been trying to outdo each other on the amount of government that they would cut — with several of them advocating the elimination of entire cabinet agencies — it’s worth noting how much government aid the citizens of those states receive, in everything from federal infrastructure money to Pell Grants. The National Priorities Project laid it out:

On average, every New Hampshire resident received $4,850 in direct assistance from federal programs in 2010 — that’s everything from the Medicare prescription drug benefit to Pell grants. According to a 2011 Census Bureau report, federal money also accounted for 30 cents of every dollar of New Hampshire state revenue in fiscal 2009, the most recent year for which comprehensive data are available. Federal money helps states pay for building roads and fixing bridges, among numerous other kinds of projects. [...]

Iowa received more federal money than New Hampshire in 2009. Thirty-three percent ($5.4 billion) of state revenue came from federal sources in that year…In addition to the billions of federal dollars that helped finance the state’s government, Iowa residents received substantial direct federal assistance. On average in 2010, residents of the state each received $5,400 from all federal programs. Iowans paid on average $5,175 in federal taxes that year — that includes income taxes as well as excise and other kinds of taxes, but excludes corporate incomes taxes. On balance, that means Iowans collected more federal benefits than they paid in federal taxes

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/01/03/397053/iowa-new-hampshire-government-funds/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iowans Collected More Federal Benefits Than They Paid In Federal Taxes (Original Post) ProSense Jan 2012 OP
How many Christian ,Militia ,teabagger ,re puby cans orpupilofnature57 Jan 2012 #1
Quite possibly a lot less than you so snarkily assume. Skidmore Jan 2012 #3
And Iowa goes Dem in Presidential elections (largely/historically.) elleng Jan 2012 #2
Who takes care of people ? Who takes care of roses? orpupilofnature57 Jan 2012 #6
Dems, of course, and Iowans ain't stupid. elleng Jan 2012 #7
A state's share of residents aged 65 or older and under 18 determines most federal spending. Thaddeus Kosciuszko Jan 2012 #4
Iowa usually votes BLUE. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #5
IOWA HAS ALOT OF COMPANY IN THE 'WELFARE RECIPIENT' DEPARTMENT democratisphere Jan 2012 #8
 
4. A state's share of residents aged 65 or older and under 18 determines most federal spending.
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 10:38 PM
Jan 2012

Moreover, a concentration of farming increases federal expenditures for agricultural assistance in states like Iowa.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iowans Collected More Fed...