Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT - Read the Emails: The Trump Campaign and Roger Stone
Newly revealed messages show how the political operative Roger J. Stone Jr. sold himself to Trump campaign advisers as a potential conduit to WikiLeaks, which published thousands of emails in 2016 damaging to Hillary Clintons campaign.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/01/us/politics/wikileaks-roger-stone-trump.html
Emails obtained by The New York Times provide new insight into those connections, as well as efforts by Roger J. Stone Jr., a longtime informal adviser to President Trump and political operative, to seek funding through the campaign for his projects aimed at hurting Mrs. Clinton. The emails are verbatim, typos and all, save for email addresses deleted to protect the emailers privacy.
...
A month before the election, Mrs. Clinton looked to be cruising to victory. Mr. Trumps surrogates, including Mr. Stone, were trying to come up with ways to attack her to help Mr. Trump gain ground.
Mr. Stone had long claimed both publicly and privately that he had foreknowledge of the information that WikiLeaks planned to release about Mrs. Clinton and her political allies. In early October, Mr. Stone predicted on his Twitter account, which was suspended after a string of expletive-laden tweets, that the documents that Mr. Assange promised to make public would hurt Mrs. Clintons campaign.
...
The final email in the exchange is vintage Stone. He demanded that Trump campaign surrogates convey his accusations, made without evidence, about Bill Clintons having a love child named Danney Williams. And he told Mr. Bannon to have the wealthy Republican donor Rebekah Mercer send money to his political organization a 501(c)(4) group sometimes called a C-4 which was structured to keep its donors secret. No evidence has emerged that Mr. Bannon asked Ms. Mercer to send money.
...
A month before the election, Mrs. Clinton looked to be cruising to victory. Mr. Trumps surrogates, including Mr. Stone, were trying to come up with ways to attack her to help Mr. Trump gain ground.
Mr. Stone had long claimed both publicly and privately that he had foreknowledge of the information that WikiLeaks planned to release about Mrs. Clinton and her political allies. In early October, Mr. Stone predicted on his Twitter account, which was suspended after a string of expletive-laden tweets, that the documents that Mr. Assange promised to make public would hurt Mrs. Clintons campaign.
...
The final email in the exchange is vintage Stone. He demanded that Trump campaign surrogates convey his accusations, made without evidence, about Bill Clintons having a love child named Danney Williams. And he told Mr. Bannon to have the wealthy Republican donor Rebekah Mercer send money to his political organization a 501(c)(4) group sometimes called a C-4 which was structured to keep its donors secret. No evidence has emerged that Mr. Bannon asked Ms. Mercer to send money.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1007 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT - Read the Emails: The Trump Campaign and Roger Stone (Original Post)
Roland99
Nov 2018
OP
All signs point to yes. Foreclosure imminent. 81. Failing health. Expiring life ins
Roland99
Nov 2018
#6
Roland99
(53,342 posts)1. Seth Abramson starting Twitter thread with more details
Roland99
(53,342 posts)4. And the end...
malaise
(269,157 posts)5. Did Peter W Smith really commit
suicide?
Roland99
(53,342 posts)6. All signs point to yes. Foreclosure imminent. 81. Failing health. Expiring life ins
malaise
(269,157 posts)3. Lock them Up
Please Mr Mueller!
Roland99
(53,342 posts)7. Related new article from The Atlantic
Roger Stones Shifting Story Is a Liability
The longtime Trump confidant could face federal charges if Special Counsel Robert Mueller determines he lied to Congress about his contacts with campaign officials and WikiLeaks.
NATASHA BERTRAND
6:00 AM ET
https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/574852/
Roger Stone cant seem to get his story straight. In 2017, the political worlds most well-known dirty trickster denied ever having a direct line to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as he repeatedly boasted during the 2016 election. Now, in light of new emails that show he communicated WikiLeaks pre-Election Day plans to at least one senior Trump campaign official in the weeks before the election, his recollection is changing yet again.
Even before the latest email revelation, Stone, a longtime friend and confidant of President Donald Trump, was in hot water with the House Intelligence Committee. Since his September 2017 hearing before the panel, hes amended his testimony three times as new reports have emerged about his contacts with Russian nationals, the extent of his interactions with WikiLeaks, and his conversations with Trump campaign officials. Despite those changes, the question of whether he perjured himself before the committee still standsand is reportedly being examined by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
Roger Stone had a chance, under oath, to tell the House Intel Committee about his contacts with Russians and WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign, Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell of California, who sits on the panel, told me. He misled us and has repeatedlythree times nowamended his testimony to fit new press reporting. Swalwell noted that the committees Democrats voted to send transcripts related to its Russia investigation to Mueller, but Republicans resisted. The special counsel should see Stones transcripts and the accounts of all witnesses, he added.
...
Stones conflicting statements have been material to both federal and congressional investigators, who want to know whether Stone served as a conduit between the campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia. Despite telling the committee that he never had any communication with any Russians or individuals fronting for Russians, in connection with the 2016 presidential election, Stone later acknowledged meeting with a Russian man named Henry Greenberg in May 2016 to obtain dirt on Hillary Clinton. With regard to Assange, Stone told the House Intelligence Committee that they only ever spoke through an intermediary, but Twitter direct messages show Stone communicating with the WikiLeaks Twitter account in October 2016. Its widely understood that Assange is the primary administrator of that account.
Even before the latest email revelation, Stone, a longtime friend and confidant of President Donald Trump, was in hot water with the House Intelligence Committee. Since his September 2017 hearing before the panel, hes amended his testimony three times as new reports have emerged about his contacts with Russian nationals, the extent of his interactions with WikiLeaks, and his conversations with Trump campaign officials. Despite those changes, the question of whether he perjured himself before the committee still standsand is reportedly being examined by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
Roger Stone had a chance, under oath, to tell the House Intel Committee about his contacts with Russians and WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign, Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell of California, who sits on the panel, told me. He misled us and has repeatedlythree times nowamended his testimony to fit new press reporting. Swalwell noted that the committees Democrats voted to send transcripts related to its Russia investigation to Mueller, but Republicans resisted. The special counsel should see Stones transcripts and the accounts of all witnesses, he added.
...
Stones conflicting statements have been material to both federal and congressional investigators, who want to know whether Stone served as a conduit between the campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia. Despite telling the committee that he never had any communication with any Russians or individuals fronting for Russians, in connection with the 2016 presidential election, Stone later acknowledged meeting with a Russian man named Henry Greenberg in May 2016 to obtain dirt on Hillary Clinton. With regard to Assange, Stone told the House Intelligence Committee that they only ever spoke through an intermediary, but Twitter direct messages show Stone communicating with the WikiLeaks Twitter account in October 2016. Its widely understood that Assange is the primary administrator of that account.