General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInside a secretive billionaire club's plan to help Democrats take Congress
The donor clique views wooing new voters in diversifying states across the southern U.S. as the best way to take down President Donald Trump in 2020, rather than prioritizing fighting Republicans for older white residents of the Rust Belt.
By MAGGIE SEVERNS 11/02/2018 05:06 AM EDT
PHOENIX, Ariz. Kevin Rodriguez, a 19-year-old aspiring singer in tight jeans and gray-and-white Nike high tops, had never heard of the powerful progressive donor group Democracy Alliance. But he is a key part of the secretive billionaire clubs plot to flip the Sun Belt.
The donor clique, which counts George Soros and Tom Steyer among its members, is quietly giving funds to a handful of local grassroots groups like Rodriguezs employer, Living United for Change in Arizona. They hope that these organizations can do a better job than Democratic campaigns at reaching and turning out young and minority voters in states that liberals have long viewed as just out of their reach.
Its a marked shift from the Democracy Alliances longtime strategy of funding Beltway think tanks to counter conservative ideas.
And its also one window into the exclusive cadres view of the best way to take down President Donald Trump in 2020: By wooing new voters in rapidly diversifying states across the southern U.S., rather than prioritizing fighting Republicans for older white residents of the Rust Belt, a raging debate in the party since the 2016 election. If the investment pays off in next weeks election results, the group might take it to more states during the presidential election.
more
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/02/2018-elections-outside-money-democrats-democrat-alliance-soros-steyer-956032
maxrandb
(15,353 posts)Billionaire funded groups.
Nice of Politico to highlight to two Jews, wasn't it?
awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)Steyer is not but he's a really hard worker. My point is, unless this group also includes other heavyweight billionaires, they are poor compared to the Kochs, Mercers, Uihleins, Adelsons. We need more of them to get involved, so hopefully they can build on this.
dalton99a
(81,570 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)We have to use all legal resources we have at this point in our history.
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)Notice how the article begins with a 19-year-old volunteer. Steyer, et al., know something that I've been putting to good use in my own canvassing efforts and that, honestly, I am constantly amazed almost everyone I talk to is unaware of:
1.) Millennials (Gen Y), currently aged 22-37 years old will have surpassed the Baby Boomers in numbers by sometime in 2019. Every single Millennial that I've helped register to vote was unaware of this fact until I told them so. I could literally see their eyes light up with an "all is not lost" realization once they understood this.
In other words, by 2020, it is conceivably within Gen Y's grasp to take political power away from the Baby Boomers, whose influence has controlled all aspects of American society for decades, even from the time they were children when everything commercial realigned around them. The Millennials' potential obviously increases as the Boomers and older generations continue to reduce by natural attrition.
2.) The "Woke" Generation (Gen Z), currently aged 5-21 years old (so, for current voting purposes, those 18-21 years old) comprise as a whole 25% of the entire U.S. population!
Yes folks, that means Gen Z is the largest American generation ever, bigger than either the Baby Boomers or the Millennials. And it's already looking like this generation, based on teen studies going on right now, are more politically aware and globally conscious than anything we've ever seen in American society at this young of an age.
Come 2020, the eldest, 1/3 of Gen Z (18-23 years old at that time) will be heading to the polls.
These are the demographics that the donors in the above article are damn well aware of and that the rest of the Democratic Party needs to wrap their heads around as of yesterday.
In this cycle, I helped hundreds register to vote: Approximately 70% of my personal tally came from these two age groups...and I myself am a Boomer. Also, I reside in the region described in the article as the "rapidly diversifying states across the southern U.S." (specifically, for me, the Southwest). And, yes, these new voter registrations are highly diversified.
I can personally attest that Democratic funds for GOTV efforts have been sorely lacking here for a long time. Meanwhile, the Republicans are already moving on the Gen Z front with clubs in all the high schools and colleges, as well as social events to rope them in.
So, for what it's worth, if there is indeed any kind of debate going on about who to target and where to put the money heading into 2020, I'm siding with the billionaires in this article, who my gut tells me are working off the same statistics I am.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)"Exclusive cadre?" This article sounds like it should be attacking "neoliberal" globalism and Soros's Jewish one world conspiracy plotting.
Apparently, though, some very wealthy progressive Democrats have been belatedly organizing to protect progressivism in government, including healthcare, to fight the tax heists, and to keep their counterparts on the right from taking over our government. She links to another Politico article on this:
A network of secret-money nonprofit groups has spent millions of dollars attacking swing-seat House Republicans on health care and taxes, quietly becoming one of the biggest players in the 2018 political landscape.
The groups have local members and names like Floridians for a Fair Shake, Michigan Families for Economic Prosperity and North Carolinians for a Fair Economy. But they are all linked to one obscure nonprofit in downtown Washington, D.C.: the Sixteen Thirty Fund, which has funneled millions of dollars to progressive causes in recent years and set up each of the new groups, according to D.C. corporation records. ...
The network, which has spent over $4.6 million on TV alone, has also been one of the top political advertisers in the country on Facebook, according to a POLITICO analysis of data from the social media companys new political ad archive.
The ads dont expressly advocate voting against House Republicans, but they do blast incumbents for their votes on Obamacare repeal and the new tax law in more than a dozen congressional districts. The two issues are ones that Democrats want at the forefront of their campaign to take back the House, though keeping the focus on those issues has been difficult amid a maelstrom of other stories involving President Donald Trump, including the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/29/democrats-dark-money-midterms-house-745145