LIMBOsevic caller says our superficial Lib reason for hating Mittens & Eddie MUNSTER is:
There's some substitute host from Wisconsin on. So this caller said she has a penetrating insight into why Libs are het up over the two, that the reason is superficial "but the Liberals I know *are* superficial(!1)."
She said that we can't stand the contrast with the President because Mittens "is SO handsome and classy and (Eddie MUNSTER) has the dreamiest blue eyes that any woman can get lost in."
Yeah. That's the ticket. Do I really need to add the pics?!1
= new reply since forum marked as read
rather than substance. 
Of course, it did come out of the mouth of a caller to Limbaugh, so you don't really expect keen, penetrating insight. Then again, that was apparently one of the reasons SnoCat Barbie was put on the 2008 GOP ticket - women, no matter what their political leanings might be, would vote for a woman. Sorry GOPers, it doesn't quite work that way. Besides, I'd prefer to vote for someone who looked like Thor rather than Eddie Munster or Herman Munster if I had to vote based on looks.
so was Ted Bundy
not saying that being good looking and being a good candidate or smart are exclusive. (hey Hedi Lamar invented the guided missile). But these things aren't synonymous either.
Seriously, if there was any group who I would consider having their voting rights taken away, it's those that would choose a candidate based on their looks. They are part of the problem.
Neither of them come close to my idea of handsome. And, let me get this straight...this bint moons over their looks and their "dreamy blue eyes" after calling liberals "superficial"?
President Obama is clearly the handsomest man on either ticket. 
I would still vote Obama/Biden. Their devilish smiles just warm my soul.
/ 
