General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet me tell you about my canvassing this morning.
We're under the gun to get 200 signatures on petition sheets to the Secretary of State or pay $750 to get my statement in the voter's guide for November. Naturally, we chose the signature route since I'm out on turf every day anyway. We found a sweet neighborhood in a retirement community that's privately owned, but not gated. Everybody's home during the day; we printed out only Democrats on the lists, and I went to walking.
It was great: wonderful people, mostly in their 80's and 90's, struggling a bit with the signature pages but happy to meet me and impressed that I would come to their door. Out of 50 or 60 people I talked to, there were 3 (younger ones, mainly) who officiously reminded me that I was not allowed to "campaign on private property." I thanked them and excused myself, moving on down the street for friendlier encounters. I believe it was the third one who called the authorities, 'cause just as I was finishing up and getting into my car, a golf cart with two staff people came up the street. When they saw me pulling out, they wheeled around in pursuit, but I pretended I hadn't seen them and simply cruised on down the street and out of the neighborhood. I'm sure I won't be able to walk that turf again for this campaign.
What this privatization of the doorstep does is much the same as voter suppression. It assures that street-level politics will fade while big money advertising and mailings will prevail. My opponent won't have to walk the district, so a ban on door-to-door politics doesn't hurt him. Many multi-family buildings and apartments are off-limits, and that's where lots of our voters are. Even gated communities contain people who need to meet me, tell me their concerns and hear my message.
We got all our petition sheets in to the Secretary of State, so I can spend the $750 on lawn signs. I just can't put them in that retirement community.
http://www.rongreen.org
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)want to get into a fight with the place, but that just doesn't sound right. This wasn't a rally, just legally required petitions.
We've done a lot of petitioning around here and I haven't heard of any problems with private communities, but now I'm going to ask around.
Anyway, good luck on the campaign.
Sanity Claws
(21,852 posts)I'm in NYC and we've had problems in apartment buildings and certain developments, like Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village.
Anyway good luck on the campaign!
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)They probuably have a blanket policy with solicitation.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)do they have a communal area where you can give them a talk on topics such as retirement, voting, issues but not in a political way. Sometimes having a friendly face there can help. Next thing maybe mail them individually saying how nice it was to talk to them and follow with a phone call. Sometimes distributing an area with a holiday card with calendar from the local Democrats is much appreciated plus surveys.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)to a rally and hand out signs. That will make them feel like part of your campaign. If they take a proprietary interest that will be good for additional votes.
Gman
(24,780 posts)there are lots of restaurants, grocery stores and other places they all commune at. While the retirement community is the center of their lives, they do leave often. Just find out where they like to eat or shop and catch them about town.
cabot
(724 posts)Too bad about the restrictions.
Ron Green
(9,823 posts)Many of these folks are not able to get out and around, which is why it's so important (and why they were so appreciative) for my calling on them. But I have since phoned one of the most receptive voters with the idea of a community meeting; we'll see where it goes.