Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,090 posts)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 09:08 AM Aug 2012

80 Percent of Public Schools Have Contracts With Coke or Pepsi


from Mother Jones:



Is your kid's public school a Coke school or a Pepsi school?

If you don't know what I mean, consider yourself lucky. Starting in the early '90s, cash-strapped public schools began selling exclusive "pouring rights" to one or another Big Soda company, which would then supply all the beverages sold in on-site snack bars, stores, and soda machines as well as at sports events. Along with sugary drinks, of course, the companies also stuffed the schools with plenty of advertisements.

In 2005, according to one survey, nearly half of all public elementary schools and about 80 percent of public high schools operated under pouring rights contracts. It's clear what the schools get for their trouble. It's no wonder that schools turn to selling junky snack food and cutting deals with sugary soda makers to augment stingy school-lunch budgets. As of 2011, we were spending more than twice as much on air conditioning for troops in Afghanistan than we do on feeding public school kids. The soda deals subsidize other aspects of schooling, too. Here's how the Rockford Register Star describes a contract between the Rockford, Illinois school district and Coca-Cola:

Under the existing 10-year contract, Coca-Cola paid the district $4 million upfront and an additional $350,000 a year to sell its beverages in schools. The annual payments have funded field trips, gym uniforms, SMART Boards and other frills that individual school budgets may not otherwise have afforded.


But what are they giving up in return? A just-released study by University of Illinois researchers compares the weight gain of kids in states that limit in-school junk food sales with those of kids in states that don't. ..................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2012/08/schools-limit-campus-junk-food-have-lower-obesity-rates



7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
80 Percent of Public Schools Have Contracts With Coke or Pepsi (Original Post) marmar Aug 2012 OP
In all fairness darkangel218 Aug 2012 #1
Du rec. Nt xchrom Aug 2012 #2
At least they're giving something back pipoman Aug 2012 #3
Dentists and endocrinologists should pay the schools jsr Aug 2012 #4
HuffPo: "Why PepsiCo Is Fighting GMO Labeling in California" proverbialwisdom Aug 2012 #5
What the hell's wrong with Moxie? HopeHoops Aug 2012 #6
I have a problem with this reporting Bandit Aug 2012 #7
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
1. In all fairness
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 09:12 AM
Aug 2012

Can you really keep kids off soda? We all grew up with Coke and Pepsi. I think the key here is moderation, parents need to step in and teach their kids a healthy diet.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
3. At least they're giving something back
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 09:18 AM
Aug 2012

and in the Rockford case it is significant. Without the contracts, the schools would still have soda machines I'm guessing.

jsr

(7,712 posts)
4. Dentists and endocrinologists should pay the schools
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 09:22 AM
Aug 2012

a commission for future business derived from these deals. Dialysis centers and funeral homes, too.

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
5. HuffPo: "Why PepsiCo Is Fighting GMO Labeling in California"
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 09:48 AM
Aug 2012
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_26043.cfm

Why PepsiCo Is Fighting GMO Labeling in California

By Michele Simon
The Huffington Post, August 9, 2012


Straight to the Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michele-simon/pepsi-gmo-food_b_1749575.html

For related articles and more information, please visit OCA's Genetic Engineering page, Millions Against Monsanto page, and our California News page.

Most people just think of soda when they hear the name "Pepsi." But in fact, PepsiCo is the nation's largest food company and second largest in the world. Its annual earnings top $60 billion, from a dizzying array of brands. Walk down almost any supermarket aisle (soda, snacks, cereal, juice) and you're likely to bump into a PepsiCo-owned product.

This explains why the company is the top contributor among food makers to the "No on 37" campaign in California -- a ballot initiative that would require labeling of foods containing GMO ingredients. Also, as I wrote about recently, PepsiCo is a member of the Grocery Manufacturers Association, a powerful trade group that has so far contributed $375,000 to the No on 37 campaign.

Why would PepsiCo pony up more than $90,000 just to keep Californians in the dark about what they are eating? A closer look at its "portfolio of products" (in corporate speak) reveals exactly what's at stake for the food giant.

PepsiCo brands span five divisions: Pepsi-Cola, Frito-Lay, Gatorade, Tropicana, and Quaker. While most consumers probably think of processed snacks and cereal-type products when trying to avoid foods containing GMOs, beverages are also a major culprit (which explains why Coca-Cola has donated more than $61,000 to the No on 37 campaign).

<...>






More: http://www.organicconsumers.org/

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
7. I have a problem with this reporting
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 11:52 AM
Aug 2012

My business provides school milk to all the schools including Charter schools, and I was informed it is a requirement that they can not allow sales of sugary drinks (Soda Pop, Juices) during school hours. We can not even substitute 2% milk for 1% when we have a shortage. All the kids are allowed is 1% or Non Fat milk and I am fairly certain it is a federal requirement...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»80 Percent of Public Scho...