Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Booster

(10,021 posts)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 12:14 PM Aug 2012

A question about R&R's Medicare vouchers. If I understand it correctly, the voucher system

wouldn't take affect for 10 yrs from now. For people over 65, does that mean that we would have the same coverage we now have with Medicare, or I should say, the coverage we had before Obamacare, which we know they will repeal. I'm trying to get my nieces & nephews to vote Dem and have told them under R&R's Medicare plan I may have to use their inheritance for medical expenses. I don't want to lie to them so I'm hoping someone who has more info can clear up this question.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A question about R&R's Medicare vouchers. If I understand it correctly, the voucher system (Original Post) Booster Aug 2012 OP
They Are Counting, Sir, On Old People Not Giving a Damn About their Children The Magistrate Aug 2012 #1
Thank you. Your answer made the most sense so I sent it to my relatives. I'm pretty sure they are Booster Aug 2012 #4
People over 65 now *will* be affected Freddie Aug 2012 #2
The promise is that your benefits won't be affected and you don't believe that for a second. Why? pnwmom Aug 2012 #3

The Magistrate

(95,255 posts)
1. They Are Counting, Sir, On Old People Not Giving a Damn About their Children
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 12:26 PM
Aug 2012

The 'plan' does indeed claim it will leave the present system in place for everyone fifty-five and older, with the voucher system coming only when people now fifty-four or younger reach eligibility age. The vouchers will be for an amount well below the actual costs of insurance, and are set to rise in a proportion much less than the rates at which insurance prices are expected to rise, so that in practice most retirees will not be able to acquire adequate insurance, if they can acquire any, though doubtless fraudsters will spring like toadstools to collect the vouchers without providing any real coverage. Above this, there will be the fact that exclusion for 'pre-existing conditions' will be allowed, and very few people will reach retirement age without something previously diagnosed that most insurance companies would consider grounds to refuse to sell them coverage.

The long and short of is you can tell your young people this plan is designed to screw, blue, and tattoo them, whatever happens to you, and that Ryan and Romney and the rest of the Republicans are counting on you being such a selfish &^%**# that you will not give a damn what happens to them so long as you have yours....

"Romney loves America like a tick loves a dog."

Booster

(10,021 posts)
4. Thank you. Your answer made the most sense so I sent it to my relatives. I'm pretty sure they are
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 08:23 PM
Aug 2012

Repugs so when they see "damn, it affects ME" they just might change their minds. I have a feeling the part about preexisting conditions is the key to getting Mr. Obama re-elected. Thanks, again.

Freddie

(9,273 posts)
2. People over 65 now *will* be affected
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 12:36 PM
Aug 2012

Since R/R plan on repealing the ACA the second they change the drapes, your prescription bills will go up because the donut hole will be back!

pnwmom

(108,994 posts)
3. The promise is that your benefits won't be affected and you don't believe that for a second. Why?
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:35 PM
Aug 2012

Because once everyone under 65 knows all they'll be getting is coupons for policies that insurance companies may or may not even want to offer, it will be a very short time before younger generations will be objecting to paying the high costs of keeping over 65's in traditional medicare. Once all the under 65's have no hope of benefiting themselves, they won't want to pay for the over 65's either. That's human nature.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A question about R&R'...