Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,219 posts)
Thu Nov 15, 2018, 06:11 PM Nov 2018

Okay, maybe I'm just ignorant here, but.....

....yesterday, text messages between Roger Stone and Randy Credico were released showing that during the 2016 campaign, both Stone and Credico knew about Wikileaks dumps in advance of their release to the public.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/14/politics/text-messages-roger-stone-wikileaks-hack/index.html

I've seen Stone and several right wing publications spin this as to somehow "vindicating" Stone.

Here's my very basic question:

How?

How in God's good name does that in any way vindicate Roger Stone?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
1. I assume Stone is trying to lay blame on Credico
Thu Nov 15, 2018, 06:14 PM
Nov 2018

But I don't care what right wingers are saying. Mueller knows whats up.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,219 posts)
3. Which might work better if there wasn't already evidence of Stone threatening Credico.
Thu Nov 15, 2018, 06:16 PM
Nov 2018

So I don't think Mueller's gonna play that game.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Okay, maybe I'm just igno...