Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 02:14 PM Aug 2012

So Mitt admits paying "at least 13%" for the last 10 years; as to jobs axed on his watch,

what rate will he admit to?

And more importantly, if trickle down is economic fact, how do his stats square with trickle down?

>>GREER, S.C. — Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Thursday that he has paid a tax rate of at least 13 percent on his income in each of the last 10 years, offering his fullest explanation to date of his tax status.

“I did go back and look at my taxes and over the past 10 years I never paid less than 13 percent. I think the most recent year is 13.6 or something like that. So I paid taxes every single year,” he told reporters Thursday...<<

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/romney-says-he-paid-at-least-13-percent-in-taxes-for-past-10-years/2012/08/16/bf4b5944-e7be-11e1-8487-64e4b2a79ba8_story.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So Mitt admits paying "at least 13%" for the last 10 years; as to jobs axed on his watch, (Original Post) closeupready Aug 2012 OP
ok, mittens if you say so..... madrchsod Aug 2012 #1
That is capital gains tax, not income tax. julian09 Aug 2012 #2
Oh, well then that settles it maxsolomon Aug 2012 #3
I think you mean "claims". Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #4
He does NOT admit to paying INCOME taxes uponit7771 Aug 2012 #5
Good point; thanks. closeupready Aug 2012 #6
capital gains *are* income; capital gains taxes are income taxes. HiPointDem Aug 2012 #8
He doesn't say how much he actually paid in taxes only the tax rate. DefenseLawyer Aug 2012 #7
Well he said he was unemployed, maybe he had unemployment checks. julian09 Aug 2012 #9
No that would be taxed at 35% DefenseLawyer Aug 2012 #10
There's a 13% marginal rate? Igel Aug 2012 #11
The rate on long term capital gains is 15% DefenseLawyer Aug 2012 #12

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
1. ok, mittens if you say so.....
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 02:22 PM
Aug 2012

wow he really is out of touch with reality.

it`s a good thing his dad is`t alive. he`d wonder what he did wrong while raising his son...

maxsolomon

(33,400 posts)
3. Oh, well then that settles it
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 02:25 PM
Aug 2012

I paid twice that rate on 1/1000th the income, but that's cool. He worked 1000x harder than I did.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
7. He doesn't say how much he actually paid in taxes only the tax rate.
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 02:35 PM
Aug 2012

If he took stock losses to offset his capital gains "income" his taxable income could have been very low or even zero. 13% of zero is still zero.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
10. No that would be taxed at 35%
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 03:16 PM
Aug 2012

Mitt couldn't abide by that. Most if not all of his income was from capital gains, offset by whatever losses and tax shelters he used to lower his taxable income.

Igel

(35,356 posts)
11. There's a 13% marginal rate?
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 04:32 PM
Aug 2012

If not, then it's effective rate. Esp. when you start quibbling--as he and his do--over whether it's 13.6 or 13.9%.

There's no income tax rate on $0.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
12. The rate on long term capital gains is 15%
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 04:59 PM
Aug 2012

He's still not saying what losses he had to offset gains.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So Mitt admits paying &qu...