General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMitt's Medicare lies derailed by his own running mate: Ryan contradicts Romney
By Sam Youngman
(Reuters) - Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan acknowledged on Thursday that his proposed healthcare reforms rely on many of the same spending reductions for which he has criticized President Barack Obama, something that could undercut a central message of the Republican campaign.
Ryan and Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney, charge that Obama's 2010 health law would weaken the popular Medicare health plan for the elderly by reducing its costs by $716 billion over the coming 10 years.
On Thursday, Ryan acknowledged that his own budget plan would keep the savings included in Obama's Affordable Care Act even as it would do away with the law itself.
"We voted to repeal Obamacare repeatedly, including those cuts," he told reporters at a hot dog stand in Ohio.
"When you repeal all of Obamacare what you end up doing is that repeals (those savings) as well. In our budget we've restored a lot of that," he said, referring to the savings.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/16/us-usa-campaign-ryan-medicare-idUSBRE87F1DF20120816
Sahil Kapur
<...>
Well, first of all, Congressman Ryan has joined my campaign and his campaign is my campaign now. And were on the exactly the same page, Romney told CBS News. And my campaign has made it very clear: The presidents cuts of $716 billion to Medicare those cuts are going to be restored if I become president and Paul Ryan becomes vice president.
- more -
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/romney-ryan-no-longer-supports-his-plans-medicare-cuts.php
INFOGRAPHIC: Everything You Need To Know About Romneys Dishonesty On Medicare
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021142794
reformist2
(9,841 posts)zbdent
(35,392 posts)Oops, I spoke too soon.
He's back to lyin' ... wait ... no ... um ... I CAN'T KEEP UP WITH THEM!!!
warrior1
(12,325 posts)or they haven't got a clue.
I vote for the latter.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Flip-floppers never learn, you can't have it both ways. Not in a presidential election.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)running away from Ryan immediately after he picked him.
Mitt Romney: Im Running With Paul Ryan, But Not On The Ryan Budget
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021110943
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)Or, should I say 'rouge'???
ProSense
(116,464 posts)KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)All that Willard and the rushpublicans want is power...the ability to raid the treasury and deregulate the economy into a feudal state. What he say...or Wolfgang as well...means little as they'll spew whatever it takes to get people to vote for them. Remember, the game here is 50.1...and if that means disenfranchising voters, so much the better. There are no specifics other than hating the colored fella and buying into one or some of their lies. Any time they're questioned by a "hostile" media (anything other than faux noise) they'll go with the talking point and lie of the moment then pivot to another...etch-a-sketching in an effort to confuse voters and distort President Obama's record.