Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"This is now beyond Nixon on every front." "Brother, Nixon is 10 miles back in the rearview mirror"
Tweets from two Republicans -- John Weaver, with Rick Wilson responding to him:
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Two other interesting tweets from Weaver this evening:
Link to tweet
The exit ramps for the rats are closed. They aren't jumping ship. They are being squeezed.
Link to tweet
Just to state the truth: Everything -- EVERYTHING -- in the dossier is true.
One of the people who tweeted a response to Weaver's last tweet there, about the dossier, is journalist Scott Stedman, who writes for the Guardian and the Atlantic:
Link to tweet
This comes from the first person to ever tweet the name Konstantin Kilimnik. That was in the Summer of 2016. Kilimnik is now central to Muellers investigation."
Stedman goes on in that thread to point out that Weaver had tweeted "Keep an eye on further links to Konstantin V. Kilimnik" in August 2016.
Link to tweet
This was 2 weeks after Manafort secretly met with Kilimnik, as discussed in tonights filing.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 940 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"This is now beyond Nixon on every front." "Brother, Nixon is 10 miles back in the rearview mirror" (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Dec 2018
OP
Poiuyt
(18,130 posts)1. So when are we going to see the pee pee tapes on youtube?
I do not want to see those ever.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,403 posts)3. when do we see handcuffs on the hill?
dalton99a
(81,569 posts)4. Yep, Kilimnik is getting some serious attention:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/12/07/takeaways-michael-cohen-sentencing-filings/
...
5. Manaforts alleged lies were also Russia-focused and deal with a big unknown
As soon as we found out last week that Manafort had allegedly lied to Muellers team, in violation of his cooperation deal, the question was about what. What was worth lying about for a man whose cooperation was required for the leniency he apparently sought?
Fridays filing in that case doesnt shed much light on what Mueller knows, but it is noteworthy how much of Manaforts allegedly lying pertain to his business colleague in Ukraine, Konstantin Kilimnik, whom the U.S. government has said has ties to Russian intelligence.
Muellers team says Manafort lied about a meeting with Kilimnik and also about Kilimniks role in a criminal conspiracy to get two witnesses against Manafort to alter their testimony.
Much of the document is redacted, but the sheer volume of Kilimnik in it leads to an obvious question: Why was Manafort trying to protect him? And could this link somehow play in the broader collusion probe? Was Manafort really worried about a foreign national being in trouble, or was he worried about Mueller connecting some dots that he didnt want connected?
Lots more questions. Not a whole lot more answers. But we have a little better idea of what Mueller is interested in, and what might be being covered up.
5. Manaforts alleged lies were also Russia-focused and deal with a big unknown
As soon as we found out last week that Manafort had allegedly lied to Muellers team, in violation of his cooperation deal, the question was about what. What was worth lying about for a man whose cooperation was required for the leniency he apparently sought?
Fridays filing in that case doesnt shed much light on what Mueller knows, but it is noteworthy how much of Manaforts allegedly lying pertain to his business colleague in Ukraine, Konstantin Kilimnik, whom the U.S. government has said has ties to Russian intelligence.
Muellers team says Manafort lied about a meeting with Kilimnik and also about Kilimniks role in a criminal conspiracy to get two witnesses against Manafort to alter their testimony.
Much of the document is redacted, but the sheer volume of Kilimnik in it leads to an obvious question: Why was Manafort trying to protect him? And could this link somehow play in the broader collusion probe? Was Manafort really worried about a foreign national being in trouble, or was he worried about Mueller connecting some dots that he didnt want connected?
Lots more questions. Not a whole lot more answers. But we have a little better idea of what Mueller is interested in, and what might be being covered up.