Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
1. Do we really give a shit what the Mormon church was doing in the 1970s?
Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:14 AM
Aug 2012

I sure don't. I care about what Mitt's plans are for the country. I don't care that he was a Mormon in 1972.

The Magistrate

(95,255 posts)
2. People Tend, Sir, To Maintain the Racial Attitudes They Were Raised To All Their Lives
Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:28 AM
Aug 2012

It definitely matters that he was reared to adulthood in a faith which held the inferiority of the Negro as divine revelation.

"Romney loves America like a tick loves a dog."

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
3. No, not really
Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:31 AM
Aug 2012

Did you watch the ad? It's little more than a hit piece on Romney's religion. And it's credited to Huntsman (which I think might be mistaken) and has an anti-Obama tag at the end. So it doesn't even belong here in the first place.

But plenty of Democrats started the same way. Everybody knows Robert Byrd's history and Bill Clinton had to make friends with plenty of 'former' segretationists to rise in the ranks of the Arkansas Democratic party.

1972 was 40 years ago. I don't give a shit what Mitt was doing then. I give a shit what he's doing now.

onenote

(42,768 posts)
5. That is a ridiculous generalization
Sat Aug 18, 2012, 08:07 AM
Aug 2012

If it had any truth, then racial attitudes would never have changed in this country at all. We still have a long way to go and they are plenty of unrepentant racists out there, but as someone who grew up in the south, I can tell you without any hesitation that there are vast numbers of people who don't have the same attitudes towards race (or to Jews and Catholics) than their forebears.

The Magistrate

(95,255 posts)
6. Actually, Sir It Is A Conclusion Based On Decades Of Observation Of Fellow Humans
Sat Aug 18, 2012, 11:43 AM
Aug 2012

And stating that something tends to be the case is not stating it is invariably so.

In applying the general view to this particular case, however, you have a person who, if he took his religion at all seriously, absorbed while young as a matter a sacred scripture directives to regard Negroes as inferior creatures cursed by his God. You then see this man, as an adult, aligned with a political party which counts persons animated by racism against blacks as its sturdiest bloc of mass support, and, as a part of his political campaign for President, personally displaying clear signs of racism in his public speeches, and giving countenance to racist speech by his mouthpieces and in his campaign advertisements. The conclusion that doctrines of the religion he was raised in have some influence on this behavior even today is a very reasonable one.

"The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet."

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
4. Fuck yes, I also care about WHY they change their doctrine. 2 wks before Carter was about to yank..
Sat Aug 18, 2012, 07:11 AM
Aug 2012

...BYUs federal exemption they get this "revelation"!??!!?!

Fuck em, it took pressure from the government for their god to give some revelation that they should change a racist ass'd doctrine and I don't believe they've changed the way they think just their doctrine

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt Romney racist???