General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Is Going On With the U.S. Navy?
I am watching college basketball and I have seen two commercials in which the U.S. Navy is offering up to a $40,000 bonus. It is not unusual for me to see Navy commercials. However, I have never seen the U.S. Navy offer any bonus, let alone a $40,000 bonus. Is the U.S. Navy struggling to get people to join? For a second I thought the seemingly good economy was making it hard to get people to join the military, even the U.S. Navy, but then I thought, Clinton's economy was good and I do not recall the U.S. Navy promoting bonuses during those years.
I have also been seeing the U.S. Army promoting bonuses, but that is not as surprising as the U.S. Navy because I have known years that they U.S. Army offered bonuses to people joining. At most the U.S. Army is just more openly promoting the use of bonuses. However, I think they may have been advertising their bonuses on TV for many years. Maybe I just heard of those bonuses through word of mouth. However, I have never heard of U.S. Navy bonuses even through word of mouth.
As far as I knew, in the past, the U.S. Navy seemed to throw money at people who were going to college while the U.S. Army threw money at people who were going enlisted. It seemed that if someone was going to college for a science field, especially a field dealing with nuclear technology, the U.S. Navy would give that person a boatload of money. However, it seems that the U.S. Navy has either ended or changed a program that used to pay students to go to college. So, is the U.S. Navy changing its focus from giving large amounts of money to college students to giving large amounts of money to high school graduates?
pecosbob
(7,543 posts)Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)...they say Navy, but they're actually being shanghaied into the new SPACE FORCE.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)As long as there are a ready available job market,recruitment goes in the toilet.
BTW,the enlistment program has been toughened up for the Navy and Air Force. If you do not pull a decent score on your battery exams,see yah. Cooking the books won't cut it any more.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)As I remember, they were about enough to buy a brand-new Corvette, which a lot of enlisted guys did with it, as a matter of fact. It was funny to see the parking lot at times. Sound far-fetched? Here's what a brand-new 'vette cost back then. I remember getting offered a $6000 bonus if I'd re-enlist. I turned them down.
Year Production Base Price
1963 21,513 $4,037
1964 22,229 $4,037
1965 23,562 $4,106
1966 27,720 $4,084
pecosbob
(7,543 posts)IIRC it was over ten thousand for my rating.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)$56,590 - $129,995, depending on model, trim level, and options. So, it looks like the current bonuses being offered won't cut it if you want to waste it on that particular fast car.
keithbvadu2
(36,917 posts)Get a big bonus. Buy a flash car. Sell it next year because cannot pay the insurance again.
Seen it.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,858 posts)pecosbob
(7,543 posts)gotta love Python
Cold War Spook
(1,279 posts)Army was offering a $10,000 reenlistment bonus for Russian translators who held a Top Secret NSA codeword clearance.
Lochloosa
(16,068 posts)denbot
(9,901 posts)Operations Specialists were offered 17k, 1/2 cash 1/2 check to re-enlist for 4 more years.
At that time we were one of the most critical rates in the Navy, and likely still are.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,902 posts)enlistment bonuses offered in ads for various branches of the military.
yortsed snacilbuper
(7,939 posts)KWR65
(1,098 posts)And then they will pay more of the bonus overtime. The GI bill still exists for enlisted and upon completion of 3 years service they can go to college paid for plus a monthly stipend to pay for housing.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)A lot of the prime personnel pool can't meet the enlistment retirements. Too fat, out of shape, medical reasons, etc. I believe they relaxed the tattoo requirements fairly recently in an attempt to turn away fewer recruits.
It's probably a service-wide problem.