General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Weekly Standard's Dismantling Is Terrible News for Conservatism and Journalism
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/12/weekly-standard-killed-no-trump-love-media.htmlThe Weekly Standards Dismantling Is Terrible News for Conservatism and Journalism
By Mark Joseph Stern
Dec 14, 20184:15 PM
The Weekly Standard shut down on Friday after 23 years of publication. In an unceremonious execution, MediaDC, the magazines owner, instructed staff to clear out their desks by the end of the day. According to co-founder John Podhoretz, MediaDC chose to kill the outlet so it could strip-mine its assets and subscriber list. The shuttering of the flagship conservative publication is a deeply unfortunate development in an era when right-leaning media is increasingly obsequious toward Donald Trump and hesitant to criticize his abuses of power. No critic of the president should cheer the Weekly Standards demise.
To many progressives, Fridays news may seem to be just deserts for a magazine that has long espoused what the left views as noxious policy proposals. And there is no doubt that the Weekly Standard has published more than its share of dubious, specious, and offensive articles. The magazine was closely aligned with the George W. Bush administration and, notoriously, vigorously promoted the catastrophic war in Iraq. Its LGBTQ coverage is reliably atrociousrecall this 2009 classic titled The Worst Thing About Gay Marriage, which claims without evidence that the most profound aspect of marriage is protecting and controlling the sexuality of the child-bearing sex.
I could go on. The magazine is vehemently anti-abortion and anti-trans, pushing offensive falsehoods to mock and degrade transgender people. It has asserted that gay people, like me, who sought the right to marry will demand polyamory next. Writers routinely peddle climate change skepticism and denialism. These articles are dangerous and irresponsible.
There is obviously much to criticize here, and I do not expect liberals to praise a magazine that has derided their beliefs for more than two decades. But there is still nothing to celebrate about its untimely death. Over the last few years, the Weekly Standard has emerged as one of the very few conservative outlets to resist Trumpism, to defend a vision of conservatism that rejects Trumps lawlessness, his authoritarian impulses, and his grotesque embrace of white nationalism. Even if the Never Trump movement represents a small segment of the Republican Party, it remains an important counter to the broader opportunistic conservative embrace of the president. And the Weekly Standards dissolution will only encourage other right-wing outlets to publish more irresponsible pro-Trump garbage.
snip//
The Weekly Standard, by contrast, has remained profoundly skeptical toward Trump. Its reporting on the latest developments in the Russia probe are truthful and perceptive. One of its very last articles, published Friday, celebrates Trumps inability to impede the investigation. There are exceptionsits executive editor, Fred Barnes, has penned some very silly criticisms of the special counsel. But the magazine has not slipped into the Federalists fever dream. It does not often carry water for the president and does not hesitate to condemn his dumbest ideas. The Weekly Standard is, in short, a conservative magazine rooted in reality.
Those are now in short supply. And while it is apparently untrue that the Weekly Standard bled readers because of its Never Trump stanceits web traffic has reportedly increasedother conservative outlets may view its death as a warning: Stray too far from the Trump party line, and readers will abandon you. We will see more writers like Byron York and Kimberley Strassel, and fewer like Weekly Standard star Haley Byrd, one of the finest congressional reporters working today.
It is healthy to have a magazine that challenges both Democrats and Republicans in good faitha conservative outlet that progressives cannot simply write off as an asinine pro-Trump propaganda machine. And it is encouraging to know that the entire conservative movement has not latched itself to Trumps cult of personality. American conservatism will always be with us, but Trump will not. What happens after he is gone? Will the Republican Party indefinitely adopt his cruelty, his know-nothingism, his contempt for the law? Or will a saner faction assert dominance in the GOP? The Weekly Standard made me optimistic for the latter possibility. Its demise suggests that the Trumpists will win out.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Good riddance to them.
pwb
(11,292 posts).
yardwork
(61,712 posts)The author lists just some of the absurd and hateful things that the Weekly Standard's editors and writers have peddled for decades, and then states that the "Weekly Standard is a conservative magazine rooted in reality."
No it isn't.
PJMcK
(22,055 posts)Screw them.
So what if he had a late-in-life change of heart regarding the direction there GOP has taken? They printed scores of columns and articles that had nothing to do with facts. They relentlessly persecuted Democrats with lies, innuendo an un-American hatred that, in our current times, seems almost quaint.
There is no other talking hear from the RW that has been proven wrong more often than Kristol.
Screw them.
MineralMan
(146,336 posts)lilactime
(657 posts)they helped pave the way for him.
GoCubsGo
(32,095 posts)While it's unfortunate to lose a conservative voice against Trumpism, this publication is one of the outlets that helped create it. Trump is their monster. It's only fitting that he destroyed them.
irisblue
(33,036 posts)NYTs usual asses-Douhat & Brooks, have whined at length in print. I'm sure more went on behind the scenes.