General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew cervical cancer test has 100 per cent detection rate
A new test for cervical cancer was found to detect all of the cancers in a randomised clinical screening trial of 15,744 women, outperforming both the current Pap smear and human papillomavirus (HPV) test at a reduced cost, according to a study led by Queen Mary University of London.
The study, published in the International Journal of Cancer, compared a new epigenetics-based cervical cancer test with Pap smear and HPV tests, and investigated how well it predicted the development of cervical cancer up to five years in advance in a large study of women aged 25-65 in Canada.
As opposed to checking for patterns in the DNA genetic code itself that are indicative of the HPV virus, the new test looks at the naturally-occurring chemical markers that appear on top of the DNA, making up its epigenetic profile.
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2018/smd/new-cervical-cancer-test-has-100-per-cent-detection-rate.html
spooky3
(34,458 posts)invent a more accurate, painless, and radiation-free mammogram...
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)No radiation. Digital mammograms are not an x-ray.
hueymahl
(2,497 posts)Both use xrays. The primary difference is digital mammography does not use film.
spooky3
(34,458 posts)and are less accurate than we would like (digital or otherwise).
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)Spread the word.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)and the problem has always been that other viruses could take their place.
This would take care of them all.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)Sgent
(5,857 posts)~18.5%. It also still requires a tissue sample (ie same procedure as a pap).
TexasBushwhacker
(20,202 posts)Yeah, until it gets to the US.
BigmanPigman
(51,610 posts)MontanaMama
(23,322 posts)Great news for women and the people who love and value them.
backtoblue
(11,343 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)I swear our country is so constrained by greed. This was discovered in Canada. Will the US "allow" this inexpensive testing? How to keep it out of the hands of medical companies that will exploit it in the US? It is good to be proactive, since we know how things go here with greed over health.
aggiesal
(8,918 posts)Now, let's hope some Venture Capitalist doesn't buy the company
so that they can charge $10,000 per test.
This has to be affordable, free even.