General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Journalistic Malpractice': WaPo Writer Says It's Time To Enter The 'No Kellyanne Zone'
By Kate Riga
December 18, 2018 8:16 am
Washington Post opinion writer Margaret Sullivan penned a buzzy column Monday calling for the networks to stop hosting White House counselor Kellyanne Conway and outlets to stop printing the words of her and the rest of the administration without context.
Spurred on by Conways lengthy and deeply dishonest interview with CNNs Chris Cuomo last week, Sullivan says its past time to enter the No Kellyanne Zone. She adds that outlets are far too wedded to both sides objectivism, a philosophy which cannot apply when one side constantly lies and misleads.
When major news organizations publish tweets and news alerts that repeat falsehoods merely because the President uttered them, its the same kind of journalistic malpractice as offering a prime interview spot to Kellyanne Conway, she writes.
Conways own husband seemed to agree, tweeting about one of Trumps lies that Conway backed up during the interview.
Link to tweet
###
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/journalistic-malpractice-time-to-enter-no-kellyanne-zone
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)Or the one who broadcasts it?
The broadcaster is pushing propaganda
dchill
(38,505 posts)Practically complicit. Just like Kellyanne.
SDJay
(1,089 posts)that this awful woman actually boosts ratings, which is the only reason to have someone this terrible on your air. I don't know one single person who doesn't hurl his/her body towards the remote the second that sour mug shows up on the TV machine.
I guess MAGAts would watch her, but not on CNN, since that's the deep state channel trying to steal their freedumb.
Honestly, is there any non-MAGAt that can stand the look or sound of this fucking soulless liar for even one nanosecond?
And yes, while it will NEVER happen, I'd love to see legitimate media sources simply state when a name arises that such-and-such will not appear on their network because such-and-such is a demonstrable liar and therefore has no credibility. Dare to dream, I guess, right?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)realize the what where and why of this Administration. Putin is pulling the strings.
Mike Niendorff
(3,462 posts)You can't take a gallon of truth, mix it with a gallon of lies, then call the resulting concoction "balanced".
MDN