General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGood gawd... Tulsi Gabbard:
Link to tweet
You know, some days I just want to burrow in my hole and think only simplistic black v white, yes v no, basic thoughts--with no thought to complexity. In my view, that is Tulsi Gabbard "think" on nearly every day.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)She doesn't give a fuck about that though.
Thank you!
allgood33
(1,584 posts)MontanaMama
(23,320 posts)Im sick about this. And I hate war.
peggysue2
(10,829 posts)And we need an orderly withdrawal to protect our own men. Our guys and the Kurds demand our fidelity, care and support. Anything less is dishonorable. And insane. I have no problem getting out of Syria or Afghanistan for that matter. I would have fully supported humanitarian aid in Syria but it turned into something else. Afghanistan? We've been in country for what? Seventeen years. Time to bring our guys home. But for God's sake, do it the right way.
XRubicon
(2,212 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)I will cross her off my presidential list. ( not that she was on it!)😉
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Do you really think any US admin legitimately cared about slaughtered Kurdish women vs Turkish or Saudi interests. Let alone Russian pressure on Trump?
That question should be directed to the generals who allied with Kurds knowing they were pawns of convenience to be sacrificed when their utility drained.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 21, 2018, 08:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Pretending otherwise is foolish in my opinion. I hope I'm proven wrong and stability and safety comes to Kurds and all in the region.
brush
(53,784 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)She's not ready for prime time.
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)pop up with something like this. Gabbard being my rep.. I know who she is.
rogue emissary
(3,148 posts)The idea she apparently can't understand is you can be against the U.S. being there. As well as against us just turning tail and leaving abruptly. We promised to protect the Kurds a group we abandoned the last time we encourage them to rise up during Bush's tenure.
Leaving like Donny wants to do will also leave a large group of civilians to be slaughtered.
Just STFU Tulsi
Cha
(297,275 posts)hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)be deleting those old tweets, though hopefully they are archived by someone.
That she is not and has not, only underscores the obvious.
Why doesn't she go ahead with her plan to run for Pres? And if she thinks the focus should be on fighting ISIS, what does she think we're doing in Syria. She's in as big a self bubble as Individual 1.
Hiya....
Cha
(297,275 posts)even though she thinks she is in that little bubble of hers.
Hey, Me!
Cha
(297,275 posts)ecstatic
(32,707 posts)There's a right way and a wrong way to handle things.
Cha
(297,275 posts)spooky3
(34,456 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)potus maybe she'll resign.
Spooky
I have friends heading your way soon. Lucky them and you to be spending the holidays in beautiful Hawaii!
Cha
(297,275 posts)and fam will come to Kailua this Christmas Holiday?
John Fante
(3,479 posts)Tulsi Gabbard should take notes.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)Barbara Lee has it exactly right.
It's not the first time Gabbard has sided with trump.
Link to tweet
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)"I agree we must bring home our troops as soon as possible," or the part where she says we shouldn't bring the
troops home?
Cha
(297,275 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Trump just continued the policy.
Me.
(35,454 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)sides with trump's gift to putin.
Me.
(35,454 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)We should have never insterted ourselves into the Syrian fiasco.
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)I agree that Trump's sudden and politically reactionary pull out is harmful to both US and Kurdish interests. I feel strongly we should have never been there in the first place. My preferred outcome is a withdrawal that would minimize or prevent another intervention by the next administration.
brush
(53,784 posts)are licking their chops right about now.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)SDF/YPG/YPJ and other Kurdish factions in Kurdish controlled Syria are more than capable fighters. They have demonstrated remarkable combat effectiveness against Turkey and ISIS. They need our logistical support not our "boots on the ground." We should provide steady supply of ATGM and heavy weaponry to trusted Kurdish factions to dissuade renewed Turkish/SAA incursions enforce a negotiated peace and future for the Kurds in Syria.
brush
(53,784 posts)That should just about cover it .
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Opinions are aplenty round here. What is your opinion for best course of action for Syria and/or Kurds in Syria?
brush
(53,784 posts)Under both daddy Bush and W Bush we promised to back the Kurds and didn't so here we go again? Historically they've been betrayed, not just by us, for many decades.
Erdogan, who wants to wipe them out, calls trump so suddenly we're pulling out?
No.
If we keep pulling this crap no one will ever trust us as allies again. Considering out past history with the Kurds it's a complex situation that needs thorough evaluation as to how to proceed and trump's simplistic pullout is just dumb.
We need seasoned diplomatic and military leadership there but we have trump.
God help us.
Cha
(297,275 posts)Doremus
(7,261 posts)Innocent lives depend on us not to act on the whim of a madman.
JHan
(10,173 posts)and jumping off the roof of the building.
A difference Gabbard is pretending to not understand.
Very Well Put
JHan
(10,173 posts)The other crucial question is the status of the Kurdish areas Rojava. In my opinion, it makes sense for the United States to maintain a presence which would deter an attack on the Kurdish areas, he said.
http://www.kurdistan24.net/en/news/13cf816e-8e40-41c8-bb76-d453a3261d8b
On top of Tulsi's whataboutism re Russian interference in the election ( NO Tulsi it is NOT about who did what when, frankly no global player is innocent in this regard. Rather it's about how to deal with cyber threats and protecting our electoral infrastructure), and now she's on this nonsense, pretending she doesn't know how agreements and alliances work. Gabbard is not stupid.
Cha
(297,275 posts)agree with this from him, too..
Noam Chomsky tells those who refused to vote for Hillary Clinton to stop Donald Trump: You Made A Big Mistake
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/noam-chomsky-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-a7438526.html
Thanks for calling out Gabbard on her "whataboutism"!
George II
(67,782 posts)uponit7771
(90,346 posts)HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)Especially after they helped fight Isis?
shanny
(6,709 posts)She's qualified to speak on this subject imo and it colors her response. WTF are we doing in Syria? Regime change? Supporting the mythical moderates (aka Al Qaeda and affiliates)? Imposing democracy / modernity at the point of a gun? That always works so well.
We create a huge effing mess and then jump in the middle of it because Chaos! if we leave.
Rinse, repeat.
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)there. That is not the issue now.
shanny
(6,709 posts)It would be nice if it changes our behavior in the future.
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)and cedes the region to Russia--not to mention the next round of humanitarian crises.
Surely you can see that.
shanny
(6,709 posts)'Cause I surely can't see that.
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)She says NOTHING of the consequences or those impacted nor any strategy concerns, but... ok.
Apparently >8 hours after that first tweet she got enough backlash that she finally mentioned the word Kurd for the first time and that there just might be collateral damage in the form of massacred allies.
I guess she didn't want to offend her buddies Trump and Assad.
shanny
(6,709 posts)the hysterical reaction to them and how it demonstrates some peoples attachment to war. Do you agree with her that Lindsey Graham has an overwhelming attachment to war?
In another tweet,
Tulsi Gabbard
✔
@TulsiGabbard
We need to get our troops out of Syria ASAP, but it must be done responsibly. Turkey will see this as an invitation to invade northern Syria, decimate our Kurdish allies, & strengthen jihadists like AQ/ISIS/etc, undermining our national security and causing more suffering.
2,539
6:36 PM - Dec 20, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
1,334 people are talking about this
she raises the very points you seem to think she "doesn't understand." Did you just not see that one, or did you ignore it?
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)So, no, she just doesn't have the judgement I'd want for a Congressional Rep, frankly, much less someone with higher aspirations. Might she acquire it?
Given her track record buddying up with Trump and Assad, not to mention giving Trump cover on some of his most horrendous anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant policies, I'd guess not.
shanny
(6,709 posts)It's hard to pick a side isn't it? Handing the country over to Assad--oh wait, he's already there, and we were trying to take him out. There are no moderates opposing him, only more bad actors including al Qaeda and ISIS, both of which were created or strengthened by our previous stupidities. Now Bolton wants to stay forever because Iran, another opponent created by our previous stupidity.
At some point it is time to get off the merrygoround. Unless you just like wars.
Cha
(297,275 posts) Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the White Houses announcement that it would begin to withdraw troops from Syria would put the U.S. at risk.
Actions have consequences, and whether were in Syria or not, the people who want to harm us are there & at war. Isolationism is weakness. Empowering ISIS is dangerous. Playing into Russia & Irans hands is foolish. This President is putting our national security at grave risk, Clinton, the 2016 Democratic nominee for president, tweeted.
Cha
(297,275 posts)The other crucial question is the status of the Kurdish areas Rojava. In my opinion, it makes sense for the United States to maintain a presence which would deter an attack on the Kurdish areas, he said.
http://www.kurdistan24.net/en/news/13cf816e-8e40-41c8-bb76-d453a3261d8b
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=11578048
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)onecaliberal
(32,862 posts)Allies is now hysterical.
Russian puppet say what?
OnDoutside
(19,960 posts)budkin
(6,703 posts)I don't understand.
Response to hlthe2b (Original post)
Post removed
oberliner
(58,724 posts)hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)merely withdraw (both Lieu and Ro Khanna). Both call for a NEGOTIATED solution and cease fire--not merely withdrawing and devil be damned.
Tulsi, on the other hand.... .
Cha
(297,275 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)"Neither the Obama Administration nor the Trump Administration had a strategy," Lieu added. "Neither Administration could articulate why we were in Syria, what the end state would be, and how we would achieve it."
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/422126-frequent-trump-critic-ted-lieu-applauds-troop-pullout-from-syria
Rep. Lieu applauds trump and criticizes President Obama in his tweet. Rep. Gabbard does no such thing yet the hate parade marches on.
Cha
(297,275 posts)rogue emissary
(3,148 posts)Lieu doesn't call Democrats that disagree with him "Neo-libs" like Gabbard did in her tweet. So I can disagree with him, but have no reason to attack or share my displeasure with his views.
I haven't followed Khanna long enough to say anything about him.
still_one
(92,216 posts)Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)Her comment was spot on.
Cha
(297,275 posts)Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)trump's gift to putin.
Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)But its nice to find out whos the wise oracle of the DU
Cha
(297,275 posts)And, yes.. Gabbard is simplistic.
brush
(53,784 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 21, 2018, 11:25 PM - Edit history (1)
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)I've always been for pulling out of Syria. I'm not gonna change my mind because the idiot in the WH agrees.
Cha
(297,275 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,389 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 22, 2018, 12:06 AM - Edit history (1)
Her devotees show up to defend her. Yet another instance where supposed Dems find themselves advocating for the Trumpian/ Russian side of an issue. The Mattis thread earlier today being another example. JPR must be a ghost town these days where digital tumbleweeds outnumber people.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Of the issue - for some odd reason.
Response to oberliner (Reply #68)
still_one This message was self-deleted by its author.
BannonsLiver
(16,389 posts)Obligatory at this point.
Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)Im all for pulling out of Afghanistan, I dont care which President purposes it. Dont conflate proper policy with the Individual proposing it. This was the Repugthink throughout the Obama Administration. Hell, Obamacare was a Romney/Heritage Foundation proposal, but look at the Repug trashing it took after it became law, because it had Obamas name on it.
Cha
(297,275 posts)does has putin written all over it.
Link to tweet
I am totally anti-traitortrump.. everything is does is a gift to putin. how quaint you're telling us not to be anti-trump.
BannonsLiver
(16,389 posts)Gabbard will never have my support precisely becUse of the things (slurs) she directed at PBO on this very topic.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Seems like binary thinking to me.
BannonsLiver
(16,389 posts)betsuni
(25,537 posts)Every time.
Autumn
(45,103 posts)number on his outrage, along with others.
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)Trump takes calls from Erdogan and Putin and split second decision announces plans to pull them out with no consultation with our allies, with our DOD, with our State Department? No discussion of consequences, no plan.... Apparently even Erdogan was shocked enough to remind him to not be so abrupt. Did you hear that?!
Yeah, Gabbard defending that is suggestive of really complex thinking. NOT
Glad and respect that she served, but that is indicative of nothing in terms of complex foreign policy understanding as she has repeatedly demonstrated.
Autumn
(45,103 posts)who said pretty much the same as her, minus Tulsi's slam on Grahams hysteria? He doesn't seem too concerned about the Kurds and our other allies either. Does that bother you? Did you ever stop to think maybe they just both released a statement without going into too much detail?
"I strongly agree with the Presidents decision to withdraw US troops from Syria. Congress never authorized the US to go to war in Syria. While going after terrorists is authorized, both the Obama and Trump Administrations went far beyond the congressionally authorized use of force against terrorists.
Moreover, neither Administration had a strategy for Syria. Neither Administration could articulate why American troops were fighting in Syria, what the desired end state should be, nor how we would achieve it.
I repeatedly criticized both Administrations for not having a strategy and for taking war actions not authorized by Congress. I am pleased that this unauthorized and failed executive branch war in Syria will finally come to an end."
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)They are at least addressing the complexities of withdrawal, something Tulsi seems totally oblivious to. Perhaps the Putin/Assad in her head is causing confusion. She surely has provided no evidence of understanding beyond the most simplistic of views.
I wish we'd not gone in to Syria, just as with Iraq under Bush*. But we are there and withdrawal has to be a carefully thought out and orderly process and not merely expend our allies as "collateral damage" and ignore the humanitarian crisis that comes. Not to mention the impact on ISIS and global terrorism.
Autumn
(45,103 posts)The only time he mentioned the withdrawal was in the first sentence. He offered nothing about what should be done to avoid the crisis that will be the result of the withdrawal.
"I strongly agree with the Presidents decision to withdraw US troops from Syria."
"I strongly agree with the Presidents decision to withdraw US troops from Syria. Congress never authorized the US to go to war in Syria. While going after terrorists is authorized, both the Obama and Trump Administrations went far beyond the congressionally authorized use of force against terrorists.
Moreover, neither Administration had a strategy for Syria. Neither Administration could articulate why American troops were fighting in Syria, what the desired end state should be, nor how we would achieve it.
I repeatedly criticized both Administrations for not having a strategy and for taking war actions not authorized by Congress. I am pleased that this unauthorized and failed executive branch war in Syria will finally come to an end."
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)Neither who have history with Assad, btw, nor a history of defending Mike Flynn and other Trump criminals and attempting to dismiss Russian interference with the 2016 election.
Link to tweet
Autumn
(45,103 posts)that's too much drama as far as I'm concerned. But have a good evening.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
hlthe2b
(102,285 posts)she advocated. Must have gotten a lot of blow back after her first two tweets. ...
Just a few items... The pro-Flynn tweet is posted upstream.
In 2015, Gabbard was among a minority of Democrats who voted for additional restrictions on refugees entering the US from Syria and Iraq. She has also previously expressed skepticism that the Assad regime is behind chemical weapons attacks in Syria, and aligned herself with nationalist figures such as Narendra Modi of India.
Breaking with most Democrats, Gabbard has embraced the use of the phrase radical Islam a phrase which to many Muslims has evolved into a dog whistle on the right intended to indict the entire Islamic faith. Gabbard has said she is mindful that most Muslims are not extremists, but joined Republicans in criticizing Clinton and Barack Obama for not employing the phrase, stating: Its important that you identify your enemy.
Gabbard declined an interview for this story.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/10/tulsi-gabbard-how-a-progressive-rising-star-is-a-paradox-for-the-left
Cha
(297,275 posts)first tweet.. no wonder she changed her tune.
Cha
(297,275 posts)Autumn
(45,103 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)she got a Hellava Lot of Pushback on her first Clueless Tweet.. where others were telling her about the Kurds.
She thinks she's potus material she's Not.
Cha
(297,275 posts)so what? Not everybody from the military knows what they're talking about.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
betsuni
(25,537 posts)Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)Then I have nothing to say about Tulsi Gabbard.
brush
(53,784 posts)WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)Arguments can be made for pulling these troops. I always look for reasons to not have our troops in conflict. Her argument here is just stupid and lacks any concern for human life.