General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm requesting people use more descriptive titles for the threads they start
It's annoying to me when I can't have any idea what the content of a thread is about from the thread title. Many people for reasons known only to themselves like to leave their thread with vague and mysterious thread titles that unkindly forces a reader to have to guess at the subject and content inside the thread.
Please please ... give your threads a title that gives a reader some inkling at what the content of the thread is about.
FTS might be the title of a thread, but what it's really describing is what I feel when once again I am left with no idea what the subject of the thread is about
TheBlackAdder
(28,216 posts).
And then when you click on it, you realize it's either a bullshit post or a repeat of 20 others in the day.
.
BigmanPigman
(51,630 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)LakeSuperiorView
(1,533 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,630 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,431 posts)Sorry, I couldn't resist.
tblue37
(65,488 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,630 posts)And don't assume everyone knows whatever nicknames you like to use. Just put the real name in the title..
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Protip; your clever little rhyming name for whatever D-List news channel personality youre posting about is both stupid and bewildering. Just use their name.
Response to luvMIdog (Original post)
Post removed
JI7
(89,271 posts)instead of just posting a link with nothing else.
tblue37
(65,488 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)because they only post OPs that are simply links. I refuse to give clicks to suck posters - and their websites.
Response to luvMIdog (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
Mosby
(16,358 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 1, 2019, 12:59 AM - Edit history (1)
I have a post in the bho group with like 56k views, because people outside DU were looking for that info.
Google has their web crawlers all over this place.
Eta 57.8k:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/11025883
grantcart
(53,061 posts)violetpastille
(1,483 posts)johnp3907
(3,733 posts)Dont even try to find out what theyre about.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)hvn_nbr_2
(6,488 posts)tblue37
(65,488 posts)Yonnie3
(17,485 posts)It sure seemed that way during the primaries.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)fit in the limited space available and once they get it down to size it makes absolutely no sense. It's funny sometimes... but I still skip them.
pecosbob
(7,543 posts)StatGirl
(518 posts)I hate clickbait -- and it's especially annoying when I'm on a small device rather than a real computer.
I would love to have the admins add a script to add the words "From Twitter" whenever anyone posts tweets. If I wanted to read Twitter stuff, I would get an account over there.
California_Republic
(1,826 posts)VOX
(22,976 posts)Try responding to those three with no further revelatory information in the post.
Thank you, luvMIdog.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)orangecrush
(19,620 posts)The few remember...
VOX
(22,976 posts)n/t
Response to luvMIdog (Original post)
Iggo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Iggo
(47,568 posts)Sometimes I'm sure I'm hilarious, but I ain't.
brush
(53,871 posts)hibbing
(10,109 posts)More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)There's already so much content here that I don't ever get to!
orangecrush
(19,620 posts)Fuzzpope
(602 posts)100%. This has irked me for a long, long time.
Sone of these op's are real energy sinks, particularly the ones that masquerade as legit news only to end up with some meme or one liner.
Other people may need such things, I definitely do not.
Dialog aimed at Trump or [insert Republican dick head of choice here] are awkward and kind of embarrassing, I mean, neither Trump or any Republican adversaries are going to read it, so who's that stuff really for, the rest of us?
Hint: we all know how each other feels, it's not necessary to smash that to atoms and back.
(Humor), or (opinion) in the subject line would be considerate. Not contributing to other members' junk data overload should hopefully take priority over click bait style titles that boost thread views.
Mosby
(16,358 posts)Maybe a color coded system that tells you the length of the post?
northoftheborder
(7,574 posts)...when a thread starts with a tweet only, I'd like to know ahead....
littlemissmartypants
(22,812 posts)Located here:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1002
Locate the words "Trash this forum" and select.
Problem solved.
You're welcome.
royable
(1,266 posts)I found myself wondering what people on DU have to gain by feeding fellow DUers clickbait.
needledriver
(836 posts)I once started a thread titled THIS!! with the message being:
"I have seen so many threads titled THIS that had a lot of recs I just wanted to see how many recs a thread titled THIS!! gets."
I got a couple of recs for it!
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,044 posts)IcyPeas
(21,908 posts)I want to know if its Sarah or Bernie.
Thank you
California_Republic
(1,826 posts)So many times I was so surprised to see what Bernie Sanders said something ridiculous only to find it was Sara.
TexasTowelie
(112,443 posts)Colonel Sanders was saying.
Revanchist
(1,375 posts)Sorry, but everyone aren't watching the same thing thing as you or can read your mind. Let us know what the bell you're talking about!
Foolacious
(497 posts)True Dough
(17,328 posts)Many of those fall into the category of "preposterous." The idea that a DU poster is the ONLY ONE to think something. Hmm, how about NO!
912gdm
(959 posts)...
Raine
(30,540 posts)I skip them when I have idea what the subject is. If inadvertently open one then I trash it.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,367 posts)Yep, I see what you mean.
Croney
(4,670 posts)like SO-AND-SO JUST DIED! I try to respond on the first thread posted but it's not always easy. Before I would start an OP about it, I would look to see if it's already posted and usually it is.
I sort GD by start time to find the first post.
And if I realize that I posted a dupe, I delete the post.
"Good citizens check for dupes" used to be encouraged here.
phylny
(8,389 posts)THIS doesn't help: Smith ahead in Senate Battle.
THIS does: Smith (D-State) ahead in Senate Battle.
Not everybody knows who "Smith" is, what party he/she's affiliated with, and what state he/she lives in.
Happy New Year!
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Within about 5 secs, I can google to find out more information?
Folks need to stop being thread police..if you don't want to read it, don't open it....move on to the next thread..
DU is not a single source information
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)druidity33
(6,447 posts)Response to luvMIdog (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)No, I don't HAVE to do anything, you presumptuous authoritarian.
Pluvious
(4,319 posts)Lack of context is just annoying, and seems to imply the OP cares not if they waste people's time.
I'd think most DUers are no longer in Jr. HS.
-
And while I'm here, please also:
1) trim off the query string "?s=21" on tweet links
2) use "its" for the possessive case
3) provide some text as to what a video has and its length
Gesh, this was really cathartic lmao
Cheers and HNY my fellow Libtards