Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,164 posts)
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 11:10 AM Jan 2019

Twitter and Facebook are censoring pro gay articles

https://medium.com/@jfinn6511/homophobia-and-religious-privilege-2b724173c426

disordered, and morally evil.”

The dialogue astonished me, so I wrote an article I called Conversations with a Homophobe. I used it as a platform to call on Roman Catholic leaders to end their bald hate speech toward LGBTQ people.

I noted that it’s plainly wrong to characterize people as depraved and evil simply because they’re members of a minority.

I noted that religion must not be an excuse for that kind of plain hate speech, and that if speech of that nature were to come from anyone other than religious authority that it would almost certainly violate the community standards of media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. I gave examples of the harm done to innocent people because of Catholic hate speech. I ended with an appeal for readers to join me in outrage and to demand that Catholics stop the hate.

I never expected what happened next —
First, I’d like to thank the Medium editorial team for curating and promoting that story. It’s had a pretty healthy readership on Medium for the past couple days, and reader interest remains high.

Sadly, outside of Medium, I’ve been hamstrung. The bulk of my readership often comes from Twitter and Facebook, and I’ve been unable to promote Conversations with a Homophobe on those platforms. Facebook stealthily deleted my story announcements. They show in my timeline for me, but nobody else can see them.

I only found out I’d been censored because I thought it odd that none of my usual readers were reacting to the story. Then I realized reaction on Twitter was also all but non-existent. It turns out that my call for ending hate speech was deemed “sensitive content,” and that its distribution had been suppressed.

end of quote

Given all it took for Alex Jones to be dealt with by Twitter this strikes me as ridiculous.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Twitter and Facebook are censoring pro gay articles (Original Post) dsc Jan 2019 OP
Fair play is dead. Firestorm49 Jan 2019 #1
I often think "media" is the most dangerous to a democracy. For example, looking at what Fox News RKP5637 Jan 2019 #3
K&R ck4829 Jan 2019 #2
This may help you understand facebook's apparently irrational decisions Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #4
Maybe the use of word "homophobe" triggers the censorship Buckeyeblue Jan 2019 #5
That fits with the process described in the Slate article Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #6
I hate this for you. akraven Jan 2019 #7

Firestorm49

(4,036 posts)
1. Fair play is dead.
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 11:15 AM
Jan 2019

It would seem to me that if any media has intentions of stifling free speech, they would notify the writer and at the very least and tell them they are being censored, and at the most, why they are being censored.
What the hell is going on in this country?

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
3. I often think "media" is the most dangerous to a democracy. For example, looking at what Fox News
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 11:21 AM
Jan 2019

has done. Facebook and Twitter, IMO, have far too much control of the nations' mind.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
5. Maybe the use of word "homophobe" triggers the censorship
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 11:33 AM
Jan 2019

I've found that I get better results when I avoid words such as racist, bigoted, homophobic when trying to address those behaviors in others. It's almost as if that word causes the person to focus more on why they aren't that word than it does their behavior.

Ms. Toad

(34,082 posts)
6. That fits with the process described in the Slate article
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 11:37 AM
Jan 2019

It's not the content, but the use of a word that Facebook's algorithm deems as targeting a protected class.

akraven

(1,975 posts)
7. I hate this for you.
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 11:40 AM
Jan 2019

I have a gay stepson, a best friend who is transgender, and another who is lesbian (whom I've been buddies with since high school and has since married her wife).

Censorship on the basis of sexual preference is just WRONG. I'm hetero, been married a long time to my bestest buddy and forever lover, who is also straight. We do NOT discriminate. Ever.

I can't get Medium from here. Heck, we can barely get internet, and lucky to get DU. I'd follow you on Twitter!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Twitter and Facebook are ...