Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,260 posts)
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 12:41 PM Jan 2019

Yemen Famine Caused By Our Bombs Caused The Death Of 85,000 Kids In The Last 3 Years. Half A Millio

This is one of the cartoons that I have seen in a long time.



Tomthunkit™
? @TomthunkitsMind
4m4 minutes ago

Yemen Famine Caused By Our Bombs Caused The Death Of 85,000 Kids In The Last 3 Years. Half A Million At Risk Of Dying In The Next 6 Months Because Of Lack Of Food And Medicine. We Are Complicit. MBS Is Running This War And His Partner In Crime, Trump Is Helping Him.


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yemen Famine Caused By Our Bombs Caused The Death Of 85,000 Kids In The Last 3 Years. Half A Millio (Original Post) riversedge Jan 2019 OP
Mohammed bin Salman is the architect of this systematic mass murder. dalton99a Jan 2019 #1
The bombs have a lot less to do with the famine then the civil war and the rebels... EX500rider Jan 2019 #2
The Saudis bombed Yemen before Yemeni forced attacked Saudi territory. David__77 Jan 2019 #3
It is not a "Saudi war against Yemen" It is a Arab Coalition helping the elected... EX500rider Jan 2019 #4
The US should not support that military operation. David__77 Jan 2019 #5
We'd lose what little pull we had with the Saudis if they switched to Chinese/Russian armaments. EX500rider Jan 2019 #7
But but but malaise Jan 2019 #6
And still it's less to do with bombs Igel Jan 2019 #8
Last 3 years? oberliner Jan 2019 #9

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
2. The bombs have a lot less to do with the famine then the civil war and the rebels...
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 12:51 PM
Jan 2019

....who have blocked/seized/taxed aid shipments plus spread IED's and mines everywhere they go making getting aid through tough. The US could sell zero bombs to Saudi and it wouldn't change a thing, they would just drop Chinese or Russian bombs on the rebels. It might make you feel better but no less bombs would be dropped. Iran not supporting the rebels would be the biggest help to ending this. And it is unrealistic to expect Saudi to back off when the rebels have fired hundreds of IRBM/Scuds into Saudi, all smuggled into Yemen from Iran.

David__77

(23,433 posts)
3. The Saudis bombed Yemen before Yemeni forced attacked Saudi territory.
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 01:14 PM
Jan 2019

The US should not support the Saudi war against Yemen. And I hope this is an important policy discussion in the Democratic presidential primary.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
4. It is not a "Saudi war against Yemen" It is a Arab Coalition helping the elected...
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 01:19 PM
Jan 2019

....government of Yemen fight off a Iranian funded rebellion.

David__77

(23,433 posts)
5. The US should not support that military operation.
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 01:28 PM
Jan 2019

As for characterizations, one could also say that the Russians helped the elected government of Syria fight off a Saudi-funded rebellion.

Regardless of characterization of the Yemen situation, I don’t think the US should support the military operation in which the Saudis are engaged.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
7. We'd lose what little pull we had with the Saudis if they switched to Chinese/Russian armaments.
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 01:43 PM
Jan 2019

...at least now we can suggest ways to limit civilian casualties and they might listen, the Russians and Chinese could not care less what they use them for.

And the government of Yemen WAS elected, the Syrian one not so much.

Igel

(35,332 posts)
8. And still it's less to do with bombs
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 03:28 PM
Jan 2019

and more to do with the need to block ports to block weapons imports.

Ports are dual use, of course.

But blaming the Yemenis for the famine is so much less satisfying than saying, "No, WE are to blame. Well, when I say 'we' I don't really mean us, I mean my domestic political foes. But I don't get people's attention and claim moral authority, now, do I, when I say 'they are to blame' because, really, that's not much better than saying its the Yemenis to blame for the civil war that actually produces the famine, inn't it?" But now I'm beginning to sound like Holly from Red Dwarf, babbling on and on, aren't I?

At some point I even mentally slipped into her lower-class British accent.

Either stop the rebels and end the war on the side of the Sa'udi's allies, or back the rebels and end the war with victory for Iran's allies. Either way, it's the war, and either way we're backing either the Sa'udi or the Iranian theocracy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yemen Famine Caused By Ou...