Beyond 'no comment': The White House has no response -- at all -- to many media questions
By Paul Farhi December 31, 2018
The New York Times published a powerful story last week about President Trumps growing isolation in the White House, with colorful details such as Trumps tendency to interrupt advisers during meetings to call them freaking idiots (except he doesnt use the word freaking).
Asked to comment by the Times reporters about this, the White House said nothing. It did not respond.
Similarly, it offered no response when The Washington Post asked the White House about Trumps false claim during a post-Christmas Day visit to U.S. troops in Iraq that he boosted military pay by 10 percent.
The White House has had no response to stories large and small in recent days: reports that Trump planned to meet with Federal Reserve chairman Jerome H. Powell, whom he has criticized (no response to Agence France-Presse); the partial shutdown of the federal government (no response to Reuters or USA Today); a report by an advocacy group that wealthy donors gave $55 million to groups supporting his reelection, despite Trumps stated opposition to such donations during the 2016 campaign (no response to Washington Post); Trumps statement that former secretary of state Rex Tillerson was dumb as a rock (no response to CNBC); a piece in the Times reporting that a podiatrist may have helped Trump dodge the draft when Trump was a young man at the height of the Vietnam War.
At the same time, the White House seems to have all but stopped explaining Trumps bizarre tweets.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/beyond-no-comment-the-white-house-has-no-response--at-all--to-many-media-questions/2018/12/31/feb2837c-0d1a-11e9-84fc-d58c33d6c8c7_story.html