Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redgreenandblue

(2,088 posts)
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 07:13 PM Jan 2019

I think having a large field in the next presidential primaries is good and in fact crucial.

Biden, Harris, Booker, Sanders, Warren, Beto and others all should run. Preferrably there should be at least ten serious candidates. No candidate should drop out of the race before, at a minimum, the first fifteen states have voted, and candidates who picked up a substantial amount of delegates in those should be encouraged to stay in the race until the very end, despite being "mathematically eliminated" at some point. These candidates can then encourage their delegates to vote for another candidate of their choosing at the convention and thus throw their weight behind whoever they find reflects their own platform most closely.

No candidate will likely end up with an absolute majority this way, and actually getting nominated will require some coalition building..

I think the perceived lack of options was the biggest driver of the dynamics of the 2016 primaries.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think having a large field in the next presidential primaries is good and in fact crucial. (Original Post) redgreenandblue Jan 2019 OP
Well said. Nothing to add to that. eom guillaumeb Jan 2019 #1
What we don't need is Democrats beating up on Democrats to gain primary votes. Hoyt Jan 2019 #2
Youre right!!!! Wiseman32218 Jan 2019 #3
I believe that this is unlikely to happen with a large field. redgreenandblue Jan 2019 #5
Probably. moondust Jan 2019 #4

Wiseman32218

(291 posts)
3. Youre right!!!!
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 07:54 PM
Jan 2019

Exactly, if they start attacking other dems, more ammo for the republicans. That is not a good situation. The opponents won't have to pay to dig up dirt if we do it for them.

redgreenandblue

(2,088 posts)
5. I believe that this is unlikely to happen with a large field.
Wed Jan 2, 2019, 07:21 AM
Jan 2019

Negative campaigning is not very effective against multiple opponents and strongly exacerbated in a two-way race.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think having a large fi...