General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump Was Never Vetted (Jonathan Chait, New York Magazine)
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/01/donald-trump-never-vetted-investigation-mueller.htmlGiulianis position is that, having been elected president, Trump should be granted immunity for his past crimes. (Of course, Giuliani also opposes holding Trump accountable for his misdeeds since taking office, like obstruction of justice, but never mind.) Giulianis complaint may intuitively seem fair why should Trump, or any president, face another review of his entire life? That, after all, is what presidential campaigns are for, so presumably Trumps election settled that matter. But the answer to this query is that, in truth, Trump was never really vetted in the first place.
This may seem like a strange thing to say about such an apparently familiar persona. Trump has been a ubiquitous character in American culture for decades. He first contemplated running for president more than 30 years ago, and 18 years ago President Trump was already a comedy punchline. Trumps career has produced a body of coverage so massive that no single person could possibly hope to absorb it all. Yet we are even now discovering the extent to which Trump is a secretive, mysterious figure who has escaped basic scrutiny. And this oversight has occurred not despite his media overexposure but, in some ways, because of it.
-snip-
The Apprentice depicted Trump not as a bankrupt crook but as a wealthy genius, for whose favor a cast of supplicants would compete. The show revolved around competing business ideas that Trump would oversee. The problem was that Trump just as he does in the White House made irrational and bizarre choices. He was frequently unprepared for these sessions, with little grasp of who had performed well. Sometimes a candidate distinguished herself during the contest only to get fired, on a whim, by Trump. Keefe reports that in such instances, the producers would edit the footage to make Trumps foolish decisions appear wise. Tens of millions of Americans voted for a television character they took to be some reasonable approximation of a real person.
-snip-
One reason Trump has escaped scrutiny, of course, is that he has withheld his tax returns. The more information about his finances that dribbles out, of course, the more explicable that decision appears. Trump has an obvious motive to conceal his decades of dependency on his fathers largesse, as well as the apparent role played by Russian money laundering in replacing those cash infusions after his fathers money ran out. Those tax returns, a basic object of examination in vetting any presidential candidate and all the more crucial for a candidate whose qualification is asserted based solely on his business credentials will finally be exposed now that Democrats have the power to subpoena them.
Another reason is that the sheer volume of news Trump has created has had a distorting effect that the media could never quite account for. Trump spent decades courting the news media, and was covered like a member of the British royal family. The sheer mass of the coverage blotted out any damning details. And the pace of the coverage accelerated during the campaign. On a daily basis, Trump committed astonishing offenses of the sort that would have destroyed an ordinary campaign. But there was hardly any bandwidth to exercise the normal due diligence in vetting presidential nominees. And when such reporting was conducted, its impact could hardly register against the constant blaring of outrages.
Measured in absolute terms, or against other candidates, Trump was subject to harsh, unrelenting scrutiny. But measured against the scale of his own dark past, he skated into office with barely any vetting at all, abetted by decades of friendly propaganda.
-snip-
Merlot
(9,696 posts)highplainsdem
(48,975 posts)dalton99a
(81,485 posts)2naSalit
(86,597 posts)America's tabloid resident of the WH.
UpInArms
(51,282 posts)I put it on the bottom shelf .. backwards ... and bitched to the checker or the store manager
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)The MSM will actually use this excuse to tear in to all Dems pasts.
Botany
(70,504 posts)+1
JHB
(37,160 posts)In 2012 Mitt Romney's tax return disclosures were barely a fig leaf: not even two full years. One was a partial, and the other was well within the time frame where it could be amended after it was out of the spotlight. This, despite the fact that his father established the practice of publicly disclosing tax returns with 12 years of forms. Why that many? Because that would give a true picture, whereas, he noted, one year could be a fluke.
Once Mitt showed that Republicans didn't really care about it, it paved the way for Kremlin Don to blow off disclosure entirely.