Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,975 posts)
Fri Jan 4, 2019, 11:56 AM Jan 2019

Donald Trump Was Never Vetted (Jonathan Chait, New York Magazine)

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/01/donald-trump-never-vetted-investigation-mueller.html


“When a man becomes president,” said Rudy Giuliani not long ago, “he shouldn’t be subject to a review of his entire life.” Putting aside for the moment whether such a review should or should not take place, Giuliani has correctly identified what is happening. The new Democratic House that will conduct oversight into the presidency and obtain his tax returns, the multiple state-level investigations into Trump’s transparent business fraud, and the Mueller probe will all pry open a massive trove of secrets held tight over decades.

Giuliani’s position is that, having been elected president, Trump should be granted immunity for his past crimes. (Of course, Giuliani also opposes holding Trump accountable for his misdeeds since taking office, like obstruction of justice, but never mind.) Giuliani’s complaint may intuitively seem fair — why should Trump, or any president, face another review of his entire life? That, after all, is what presidential campaigns are for, so presumably Trump’s election settled that matter. But the answer to this query is that, in truth, Trump was never really vetted in the first place.

This may seem like a strange thing to say about such an apparently familiar persona. Trump has been a ubiquitous character in American culture for decades. He first contemplated running for president more than 30 years ago, and 18 years ago “President Trump” was already a comedy punchline. Trump’s career has produced a body of coverage so massive that no single person could possibly hope to absorb it all. Yet we are even now discovering the extent to which Trump is a secretive, mysterious figure who has escaped basic scrutiny. And this oversight has occurred not despite his media overexposure but, in some ways, because of it.

-snip-

The Apprentice depicted Trump not as a bankrupt crook but as a wealthy genius, for whose favor a cast of supplicants would compete. The show revolved around competing business ideas that Trump would oversee. The problem was that Trump — just as he does in the White House — made irrational and bizarre choices. He “was frequently unprepared for these sessions, with little grasp of who had performed well. Sometimes a candidate distinguished herself during the contest only to get fired, on a whim, by Trump.” Keefe reports that in such instances, the producers would edit the footage to make Trump’s foolish decisions appear wise. Tens of millions of Americans voted for a television character they took to be some reasonable approximation of a real person.

-snip-

One reason Trump has escaped scrutiny, of course, is that he has withheld his tax returns. The more information about his finances that dribbles out, of course, the more explicable that decision appears. Trump has an obvious motive to conceal his decades of dependency on his father’s largesse, as well as the apparent role played by Russian money laundering in replacing those cash infusions after his father’s money ran out. Those tax returns, a basic object of examination in vetting any presidential candidate — and all the more crucial for a candidate whose qualification is asserted based solely on his business credentials — will finally be exposed now that Democrats have the power to subpoena them.

Another reason is that the sheer volume of news Trump has created has had a distorting effect that the media could never quite account for. Trump spent decades courting the news media, and was covered like a member of the British royal family. The sheer mass of the coverage blotted out any damning details. And the pace of the coverage accelerated during the campaign. On a daily basis, Trump committed astonishing offenses of the sort that would have destroyed an ordinary campaign. But there was hardly any bandwidth to exercise the normal due diligence in vetting presidential nominees. And when such reporting was conducted, its impact could hardly register against the constant blaring of outrages.

Measured in absolute terms, or against other candidates, Trump was subject to harsh, unrelenting scrutiny. But measured against the scale of his own dark past, he skated into office with barely any vetting at all, abetted by decades of friendly propaganda.

-snip-
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donald Trump Was Never Vetted (Jonathan Chait, New York Magazine) (Original Post) highplainsdem Jan 2019 OP
"...measured against the scale of his own dark past" Merlot Jan 2019 #1
That was an especially important point to make. highplainsdem Jan 2019 #9
He was vetted by the National Enquirer dalton99a Jan 2019 #2
Exactly. 2naSalit Jan 2019 #4
Every time I saw that POS rag near my grocery store checkout, UpInArms Jan 2019 #6
And watch what happens to the Dems in 2020 rufus dog Jan 2019 #3
"The Apprentice depicted Trump not as a bankrupt crook but as a wealthy genius ... " Botany Jan 2019 #5
On the subject of undisclosed tax returns, let's remember it's not just Trump... JHB Jan 2019 #7
K&R Scurrilous Jan 2019 #8

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
1. "...measured against the scale of his own dark past"
Fri Jan 4, 2019, 12:01 PM
Jan 2019
Measured in absolute terms, or against other candidates, Trump was subject to harsh, unrelenting scrutiny. But measured against the scale of his own dark past, he skated into office with barely any vetting at all, abetted by decades of friendly propaganda.

UpInArms

(51,282 posts)
6. Every time I saw that POS rag near my grocery store checkout,
Fri Jan 4, 2019, 01:11 PM
Jan 2019

I put it on the bottom shelf .. backwards ... and bitched to the checker or the store manager

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
3. And watch what happens to the Dems in 2020
Fri Jan 4, 2019, 12:07 PM
Jan 2019

The MSM will actually use this excuse to tear in to all Dems pasts.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
7. On the subject of undisclosed tax returns, let's remember it's not just Trump...
Fri Jan 4, 2019, 01:47 PM
Jan 2019

In 2012 Mitt Romney's tax return disclosures were barely a fig leaf: not even two full years. One was a partial, and the other was well within the time frame where it could be amended after it was out of the spotlight. This, despite the fact that his father established the practice of publicly disclosing tax returns with 12 years of forms. Why that many? Because that would give a true picture, whereas, he noted, “one year could be a fluke”.

Once Mitt showed that Republicans didn't really care about it, it paved the way for Kremlin Don to blow off disclosure entirely.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Donald Trump Was Never Ve...