Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,964 posts)
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 02:25 PM Jan 2019

Court rules against Planned Parenthood in Texas 'sting videos' case, bringing it a step closer to ge

Source: Washington Post

Court rules against Planned Parenthood in Texas ‘sting videos’ case, bringing it a step closer to getting defunded

By Meagan Flynn January 18 at 7:26 AM

When Texas tried to kick Planned Parenthood out of the state’s Medicaid program based on “sting" videos produced by undercover antiabortion activists, a federal judge in Austin said the whole case sounded more as if it belonged in a “best-selling novel.”

“Yet, rather than a villain plotting to take over the world, the subject of this case is the State of Texas’s efforts to expel a group of health care providers from a social health care program for families and individuals with limited resources,” U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks wrote in February 2017.

Sparks was skeptical. Texas contended the videos showed Planned Parenthood discussing the illegal sale of fetal tissue of aborted babies, an interpretation Planned Parenthood has disputed. Sparks, in turn, said the state had not produced “even a scintilla of evidence” suggesting Planned Parenthood should be disqualified from Medicaid based on the videos.


But on Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit said Sparks is the one who had it all wrong. The three-judge panel found he used the incorrect standard of review, vacating Sparks’s 2017 preliminary injunction that had blocked Texas from defunding Planned Parenthood, and remanding the case back to the district court for further review.

The ruling from the 5th Circuit effectively gives weight to the sting videos and the conclusions Texas reached based on them in a way the court hasn’t offered before. It comes one month after the Supreme Court left in place a previous ruling by the 5th Circuit in favor of Planned Parenthood. In that case, the 5th Circuit rejected Louisiana’s effort to defund the health-care provider that had been based in part on the sting videos, mostly because the state hadn’t cited the videos in writing when announcing its decision to terminate the Planned Parenthood contract and lacked other adequate reasoning. (The Supreme Court also declined to hear a similar effort from Kansas.)

-snip-


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/18/court-rules-against-planned-parenthood-texas-sting-videos-case-bringing-it-step-closer-getting-defunded/
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court rules against Planned Parenthood in Texas 'sting videos' case, bringing it a step closer to ge (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2019 OP
Not good. 2naSalit Jan 2019 #1
K&R for broader exposure uppityperson Jan 2019 #2
GOP wants to start killing women ASAP just in case patriots get power back to stop them. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #3
Wait, what? ScratchCat Jan 2019 #4
She was mentioned as PDittie Jan 2019 #9
Fuckers. ismnotwasm Jan 2019 #5
what did the videos show? Joe941 Jan 2019 #6
If we elect a Democratic President and a Democratic Senate next year, and keep the House DFW Jan 2019 #7
Disgusting Solly Mack Jan 2019 #8

2naSalit

(86,824 posts)
1. Not good.
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 02:27 PM
Jan 2019

All levels of our government need to be scrubbed of these type of politicians and their hand picked judges.

ScratchCat

(2,002 posts)
4. Wait, what?
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 02:39 PM
Jan 2019
Jones, in particular, has openly criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. In this ruling, she included a graphic photo of bloody fetal tissue that came from the video footage, apparently for dramatic effect, Chandler said.

This is a judge? I am completely speechless.

DFW

(54,447 posts)
7. If we elect a Democratic President and a Democratic Senate next year, and keep the House
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 02:46 PM
Jan 2019

We will still need eight years just for damage control.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court rules against Plann...