Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCourt rules against Planned Parenthood in Texas 'sting videos' case, bringing it a step closer to ge
Source: Washington Post
Court rules against Planned Parenthood in Texas sting videos case, bringing it a step closer to getting defunded
By Meagan Flynn January 18 at 7:26 AM
When Texas tried to kick Planned Parenthood out of the states Medicaid program based on sting" videos produced by undercover antiabortion activists, a federal judge in Austin said the whole case sounded more as if it belonged in a best-selling novel.
Yet, rather than a villain plotting to take over the world, the subject of this case is the State of Texass efforts to expel a group of health care providers from a social health care program for families and individuals with limited resources, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks wrote in February 2017.
Sparks was skeptical. Texas contended the videos showed Planned Parenthood discussing the illegal sale of fetal tissue of aborted babies, an interpretation Planned Parenthood has disputed. Sparks, in turn, said the state had not produced even a scintilla of evidence suggesting Planned Parenthood should be disqualified from Medicaid based on the videos.
But on Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit said Sparks is the one who had it all wrong. The three-judge panel found he used the incorrect standard of review, vacating Sparkss 2017 preliminary injunction that had blocked Texas from defunding Planned Parenthood, and remanding the case back to the district court for further review.
The ruling from the 5th Circuit effectively gives weight to the sting videos and the conclusions Texas reached based on them in a way the court hasnt offered before. It comes one month after the Supreme Court left in place a previous ruling by the 5th Circuit in favor of Planned Parenthood. In that case, the 5th Circuit rejected Louisianas effort to defund the health-care provider that had been based in part on the sting videos, mostly because the state hadnt cited the videos in writing when announcing its decision to terminate the Planned Parenthood contract and lacked other adequate reasoning. (The Supreme Court also declined to hear a similar effort from Kansas.)
-snip-
By Meagan Flynn January 18 at 7:26 AM
When Texas tried to kick Planned Parenthood out of the states Medicaid program based on sting" videos produced by undercover antiabortion activists, a federal judge in Austin said the whole case sounded more as if it belonged in a best-selling novel.
Yet, rather than a villain plotting to take over the world, the subject of this case is the State of Texass efforts to expel a group of health care providers from a social health care program for families and individuals with limited resources, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks wrote in February 2017.
Sparks was skeptical. Texas contended the videos showed Planned Parenthood discussing the illegal sale of fetal tissue of aborted babies, an interpretation Planned Parenthood has disputed. Sparks, in turn, said the state had not produced even a scintilla of evidence suggesting Planned Parenthood should be disqualified from Medicaid based on the videos.
But on Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit said Sparks is the one who had it all wrong. The three-judge panel found he used the incorrect standard of review, vacating Sparkss 2017 preliminary injunction that had blocked Texas from defunding Planned Parenthood, and remanding the case back to the district court for further review.
The ruling from the 5th Circuit effectively gives weight to the sting videos and the conclusions Texas reached based on them in a way the court hasnt offered before. It comes one month after the Supreme Court left in place a previous ruling by the 5th Circuit in favor of Planned Parenthood. In that case, the 5th Circuit rejected Louisianas effort to defund the health-care provider that had been based in part on the sting videos, mostly because the state hadnt cited the videos in writing when announcing its decision to terminate the Planned Parenthood contract and lacked other adequate reasoning. (The Supreme Court also declined to hear a similar effort from Kansas.)
-snip-
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/18/court-rules-against-planned-parenthood-texas-sting-videos-case-bringing-it-step-closer-getting-defunded/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1086 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court rules against Planned Parenthood in Texas 'sting videos' case, bringing it a step closer to ge (Original Post)
Eugene
Jan 2019
OP
GOP wants to start killing women ASAP just in case patriots get power back to stop them.
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#3
2naSalit
(86,824 posts)1. Not good.
All levels of our government need to be scrubbed of these type of politicians and their hand picked judges.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)2. K&R for broader exposure
Eliot Rosewater
(31,125 posts)3. GOP wants to start killing women ASAP just in case patriots get power back to stop them.
ScratchCat
(2,002 posts)4. Wait, what?
Jones, in particular, has openly criticized the Supreme Courts decision in Roe v. Wade. In this ruling, she included a graphic photo of bloody fetal tissue that came from the video footage, apparently for dramatic effect, Chandler said.
This is a judge? I am completely speechless.
This is a judge? I am completely speechless.
PDittie
(8,322 posts)9. She was mentioned as
GHWB's second choice for the Supreme Court, in 1990.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edith_Jones#Supreme_Court_consideration
Thank goodness David Souter was a 'slam dunk'.
ismnotwasm
(42,016 posts)5. Fuckers.
People dont realize how deadly or disabling pregnancy can be.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)6. what did the videos show?
DFW
(54,447 posts)7. If we elect a Democratic President and a Democratic Senate next year, and keep the House
We will still need eight years just for damage control.
Solly Mack
(90,789 posts)8. Disgusting