Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

boston bean

(36,222 posts) Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:45 PM Jan 2019

1

Fucking Jason Leopold!

Mueller says his story is shite!

I was concerned about this coming from him. I remember fitzmas. And he was at the center of that shitfest.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fucking Jason Leopold! (Original Post) boston bean Jan 2019 OP

Fool me once, shame on me oberliner Jan 2019 #1

The guy deserves to never work in journalism again. boston bean Jan 2019 #3

Not really. DURHAM D Jan 2019 #2

I don't think so. But what makes you think that? boston bean Jan 2019 #5

The careful wording. DURHAM D Jan 2019 #8

How do you figure? oberliner Jan 2019 #6

They didn't say that. madaboutharry Jan 2019 #4

"Not accurate" is not the same as "false"? oberliner Jan 2019 #7

In the world of lawyers it is not the same. madaboutharry Jan 2019 #9

Don't know much about legal terminology, eh? LanternWaste Jan 2019 #11

I will do my best to respond to this in 24 business hours oberliner Jan 2019 #16

CNN pressed the other reporter about this this morning underpants Jan 2019 #10

Fucking A. This guy is a fucking loser!! boston bean Jan 2019 #12

Amen. We got fucked on Fitzmas by this guy. gldstwmn Jan 2019 #14

I'm surprised Mueller's office said anything at all. n/t grumpyduck Jan 2019 #13

I had doubts all along Raine Jan 2019 #15

oberliner

(58,724 posts)

1. Fool me once, shame on me

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:47 PM

Jan 2019

Won't get fooled again.

boston bean

(36,222 posts)

3. The guy deserves to never work in journalism again.

Reply to oberliner (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:48 PM

Jan 2019

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)

2. Not really.

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:48 PM

Jan 2019

Seems more like a soft confirmation.

boston bean

(36,222 posts)

5. I don't think so. But what makes you think that?

Reply to DURHAM D (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:49 PM

Jan 2019

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)

8. The careful wording.

Reply to boston bean (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:50 PM

Jan 2019

It seems to be about the "emails".

oberliner

(58,724 posts)

6. How do you figure?

Reply to DURHAM D (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:49 PM

Jan 2019

madaboutharry

(40,212 posts)

4. They didn't say that.

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:48 PM

Jan 2019

They said as described it is not accurate. That is not the same as saying the story is false. It could be that something is off.

There is nuance going on here.

oberliner

(58,724 posts)

7. "Not accurate" is not the same as "false"?

Reply to madaboutharry (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:49 PM

Jan 2019

Seriously?

madaboutharry

(40,212 posts)

9. In the world of lawyers it is not the same.

Reply to oberliner (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:50 PM

Jan 2019

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)

11. Don't know much about legal terminology, eh?

Reply to oberliner (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:56 PM

Jan 2019

It's cool... can be almost as difficult as special elections.

oberliner

(58,724 posts)

16. I will do my best to respond to this in 24 business hours

Reply to LanternWaste (Reply #11)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 09:51 PM

Jan 2019

underpants

(182,844 posts)

10. CNN pressed the other reporter about this this morning

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:54 PM

Jan 2019

His answer was way weaker than his selling of the story. I felt a disturbance in the force.

boston bean

(36,222 posts)

12. Fucking A. This guy is a fucking loser!!

Reply to underpants (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 08:56 PM

Jan 2019

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)

14. Amen. We got fucked on Fitzmas by this guy.

Reply to boston bean (Reply #12)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 09:29 PM

Jan 2019

Trump is guilty AF. We didn't need this guy to interfere. Why in God's name did the MSM pick this up given his track record? Ugh.

grumpyduck

(6,240 posts)

13. I'm surprised Mueller's office said anything at all. n/t

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 09:03 PM

Jan 2019

Raine

(30,540 posts)

15. I had doubts all along

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 09:48 PM

Jan 2019

that's why I never "invested" in the whole thing. So far all these things have been duds that lead to nothing.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fucking Jason Leopold!