Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 09:02 PM Jan 2019

Passively agressively trying to get the the Speaker of the House killed by leaking

classified information about her itinerary visiting a war zone for being a woman who exposes his weaknesses and refuses to SHUT HER GODDAMNED HAG PIEHOLE and BEHAVE is White House policy now?

His base will smile and say, "Well, she should have thought of that before she.." just like immigrant parents should have "thought about that" before their kids got caged or died in ICE custody, or unarmed POC gunned down by law enforcement should have "thought about that" before driving or walking through a white neighborhood, or slutty 15 year old girls who are assualted should have "thought about that" before showing up at a party where Boof Kavanaugh and Squee were going to be drinking, or those with medical addictions who died but for a dose of Naloxone should have "thought about that" before.... well, you know.

We are dealing with Third Reich mentality here.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Passively agressively trying to get the the Speaker of the House killed by leaking (Original Post) ehrnst Jan 2019 OP
I have trouble getting worked up over the "leak." Igel Jan 2019 #1

Igel

(35,323 posts)
1. I have trouble getting worked up over the "leak."
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 09:23 PM
Jan 2019

Since there's about zero chance of her being able to catch commercial flights for her itinerary, what was leaked was something that wasn't going to happen.

Nobody was endangered by saying she wasn't going to be going there. Perhaps it may heighten suspicions in the future that if Pelosi vanishes from the public spotlight for a day or two that she's on the way to someplace risky, but there are so many such places that it doesn't matter.

More than likely there'd have been some sort of photo shoot from these places, tweeted in nearly real time. To the extent that Taliban operations require days of planning, she'd be safe. To the extent that they require almost no planning, the tweet would be a much more egregious leak.

On Boxing Day there was a report in the WaPo that a plane spotter in Britain had sighted AF1 and immediately published his picture with location, direction, est. of speed. So that when the press was unawares that Trump was out of the country, somebody could have easily seen that Trump was in the skies over Britain, and heading SE. Get a few others to sight AF1, complete the great circle, and see where he's likely heading.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Passively agressively try...