S a slightly inaccurate statement that is a fraction of the article can easily be disputed without in any way saying that the substance of the article is incorrect.

Recommended.

buzzfeed is not part of their report

they did not say it was untrue. Inaccurate is different from untrue and many analyses are taking it as the SC distancing itself without claiming they are not telling the truth.

I would think it could be just that they wish to vaguely indicate they are not the source for this story. It could be SDNY, as many are speculating, the source instead.

There are so many tentacles to this crime organization.

which it is

A lot is going to be blasting at us, we must remain focused.

The wording I saw was "not precise", which is not the same as "inaccurate", which is not the same as "untrue".

Just to make things even less clear.

and I apologize for the confusion.

Some days my vocabulary runs and hides somewhere else.

This idiot (Leopold) has done more in a single day to legitimize Trump's "fake news" assault upon our press than he himself has managed to achieve in over two years combined.

This just fired his base up on frigging steroids.

Thanks, guy.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/media/buzzfeed-reporter-jason-leopold/index.html