General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump White House reportedly sought to put Pelosi 'in her place'
I missed this story but it is not surprising.
Trump White House reportedly sought to put Pelosi in her place
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-white-house-reportedly-sought-put-pelosi-her-place
01/18/19 09:20 AM By Steve Benen
One of the most striking aspects of Donald Trumps petty decision to cancel House Speaker Nancy Pelosis trip to Afghanistan is the degree to which it was lacking in any sense of proportionality. The president and his team were bothered that the California Democrat had raised security concerns about the upcoming State of the Union address.
In response, Trump decided to scrap a long-planned secret trip in which congressional leaders including the chairs of the House Intelligence and Foreign Affairs Committees who were set to visit with American troops stationed abroad, while receiving briefings on the status of an ongoing war.
Its hard to imagine any fair-minded observer making the case that these are two comparable.
So why did this happen? According to a striking New York Times report, the West Wing wanted to put Pelosi in her place.
White House officials including Mick Mulvaney, the acting chief of staff had been irked by Ms. Pelosis invocation of security concerns as her premise for urging Mr. Trump to move his speech, and sought to put her in her place after she had emphasized that she represented a coequal branch in governing, according to aides who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal discussions.........
Depriving Ms. Pelosi of an aircraft was the easiest way to remind her, they said. So Mr. Trump made a play for dominance and one-upmanship . White House aides were tickled by the move, even as some acknowledged that Republican House members might fear for their own trips going forward.
.......................................
Ohiogal
(32,016 posts)He is so vile, petty, and vindictive.
I can't wait until we have a normal human being in the WH!
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)ginnyinWI
(17,276 posts)But you know what? She is still the head of a co-equal branch of the U.S. government!
theaocp
(4,241 posts)The language of "CO-EQUAL BRANCH OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT" is not shouted enough by EVERYONE on our side. She is his fucking peer.
2naSalit
(86,673 posts)interviews/discussions on MSNBC yesterday.
One of the "things" I used to do was observe testimony in federal hearings and analyze the language, terminology and reinterpreted words used in the testimonies individually and collectively. Word counts reveal interesting things when dealing with policy matters... meaning I would identify given terms that were repeated within a testimony and among testimonies, as in parroting and the like, which identifies certain perceptions of stakeholders and policy writers. It's an interesting thing to engage in.
We need to make this phrase a common term in our parlance now and act like we know that this is the truth and reality in every political conversation relative to this matter.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,432 posts)He's risking total failure.
yardwork
(61,671 posts)Why is a senator representing the United States in a state-level visit with the head of a foreign nation who is hostile to U.S. interests in Syria?
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Uh-huh. Uh-huh.
Wounded Bear
(58,673 posts)She's right where she belongs, in the position she earned by being a great leader, great vote counter, and perhaps the most effective legislator of the past few decades.
2naSalit
(86,673 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)2naSalit
(86,673 posts)focus on visualizing that very scenario... maybe that will happen.
Worth a try at this point.