General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Proposals Could Increase Health Costs for Consumers
WASHINGTON Consumers who use expensive brand-name prescription drugs when cheaper alternatives are available could face higher costs under a new policy being proposed by the Trump administration.
The proposal, to be published this week in the Federal Register, would apply to health insurance plans sold under the Affordable Care Act.
Health plans have annual limits on consumers out-of-pocket costs. Under the proposal, insurers would not have to count the full amount of a consumers co-payment for a brand-name drug toward the annual limit on cost-sharing. Insurers would have to count only the smaller amount that would be charged for a generic version of the drug.
For example, if a consumer filled a doctors prescription for a brand-name drug with a $25 co-payment, rather than using a generic medicine with a $5 co-payment, the consumer might get credit for only $5 in out-of-pocket spending. Consumers would have to spend more of their own money before reaching the annual limit on out-of-pocket costs.
In addition, insurers would not have to count the value of coupons and other financial assistance provided to consumers by drug manufacturers if generic alternatives were available. This change could significantly increase consumers out-of-pocket costs for some of the more expensive prescription drugs and has prompted protests from groups representing patients.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/trump-proposals-could-increase-health-costs-for-consumers/ar-BBSz87R
Trump always seems to show more concern for the business than the consumer.
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)Since he always maintained the ACA was terrible, he'll do what he can to make it so.
Freethinker65
(10,015 posts)most should see no difference with the generic equivalent.
As much as I hate most of Trump's proposed policy changes, encouraging patients to use generic equivalents when available is not inherently evil. I have employer provided coverage and I specifically ask for generics. I remember trying to fill an Rx and was floored it was going to cost $200+ out of pocket for a new foam version of a topical steroid when a generic spray that would, in my case, work just as well was a mere $5 copay (for an under $50 drug). I went back to my doctor and got the Rx for the spray version.
As long as the doctor has the option of getting authorization to prescribe name brands over generics when medically necessary, and the option for paying more out of pocket if the patient just wants the name brand med still exists, and this is explained to the patient, I can understand this proposed change.
I do not fully understand the change with coupons/assistance, but I would assume if you are getting a discount or rebate, that money should not count towards your out of pocket expenses.