General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI've never seen such a constant and vitriolic blast of "GFY" like there is in Schultz's Twitter feed
I've never seen so many f-bombs, I've never seen so many tweets with the hashtag #DontRunHoward.
It seems like the only person who wants him to run, other than Schultz himself, is Trump.
I see three reasons for this (or some combination of them all):
1). He's fucking stupid
2). He's fucking arrogant
4). He's as fucking needy as Trump, and wants to hold his own MAGA rallies
5). He knows EXACTLY what he's doing, and WANTS to aid Trump by siphoning off Dem votes.
I hope this clown show ends soon. Fuck this guy.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,022 posts)nolabear
(41,991 posts)Trust me, Seattle is FULL of Fuck this guy.
leftieNanner
(15,160 posts)Oh, yes. FTG!
I'm a long time Warriors fan (even when they were crappy), but I always loved the Sonics.
But then there are lots of reasons to dislike Mr. Coffee
LisaM
(27,839 posts)He also cut a private driveway to his house through a public park.
nolabear
(41,991 posts)MFM008
(19,820 posts)Never drink it.
happybird
(4,634 posts)are you kidding me?!?
That kind of crap REALLY grinds my gears.
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)And, if youre wondering why hes chosen to run, he says its because of AOC and her eeeeeevil proposal to tax the rich. Seriously.
standingtall
(2,787 posts)because he might as well be a tea party republican.
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)...I worry that, by October 2020, every Starbucks in the country will have turned into a de facto campaign stop.
Vinca
(50,310 posts)have money. Better to bleed Grandma's Social Security.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Hopefully they can tighten the old belt and live within those poverty level meager means!
Hekate
(90,829 posts)...of their earnings, or 70% of all they've got, or whatever. I have a former neighbor who thinks like that. He operates a small blue collar business and inherited some apartments and the house he lives in. I know his wealth tops a couple million only because real estate in this region is insanely high in value. That's not his income, though. And $70 million might as well be on the moon.
But, taxes bad.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)it....but if you lead with that, you will 100% lose TX (My POV = turn TX blue).
I know other countries have it - but I don't know how they came to have it. Is there a way to commit to it in some kind of incremental basis/phase in? Definitely think it will be harder to go from a capitalist/private for profit straight to universal. Just have never heard anyone discuss this. And, say you phase in a segment, then that will have an averse affect on the for-profit premiums since their pool will be smaller.
oldsoftie
(12,615 posts)They have a consumption tax along with the income tax.
The US depends on almost all revenue from income taxes. And nearly 1/2 of us pay nothing in income taxes.
Yes, I beat the dead horse on consumption taxes. Because I see SO much income that doesnt get taxed. And even the fantasy of a 70% tax on income over 70 million or 10 million STILL wont raise enough to get us there.
We MUST do whats needed to at least stop people from going bankrupt just because they got sick.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)what the genesis of universal care was in those countries who have it. Watching one of Michael Moore's documentaries about Scandinavia and what a great place that is - how they care for their less fortunate, and their sick, it made me wonder. What is it and what is it about a country where the majority care so much.
I am probably really jaded since I now live in deep red country, but I don't see the people around me ever, in a generation at least, caring about the masses, like it seems it is so innate elsewhere.
My point is, I think there must be a much more effective way to present an approach for universal healthcare than the big bang - "not-for-profit" care - for a country where many don't care about others and is used to for-profit systems.
I am not thinking about myself - I am 100% for it - just being pragmatic - how you sell it, how you phase it in - logistically.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)...he has officially said that he was spurred to run by the threat of AOC and her tax plan.
Apollyonus
(812 posts)of instant sycophants who want to reduce the weight of a billionaire's wallet.
marlakay
(11,498 posts)He is afraid if a left leaning person gets in they will take away a bunch of his money in taxes.
Unfortunately I think out of selfishness he is going to go all the way so we are going to have to find the votes to beat a third party also.
calimary
(81,510 posts)Cosmocat
(14,574 posts)it is going to be a pretty miserable experience for him, and who wants to put up with that for two years ...
Iggo
(47,571 posts)CharleyDog
(758 posts)America, it's worth it for money, "my money, my beautiful money."
panader0
(25,816 posts)"Egotistical billionaire asshole."
Of course he was escorted out.
Gore1FL
(21,152 posts)As I see it, that call-out was a direct-hit. He's defined.
Nitram
(22,892 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)marble falls
(57,270 posts)happybird
(4,634 posts)It's been a rough day and I really needed a big laugh. Thank you.
marble falls
(57,270 posts)yaesu
(8,020 posts)mercuryblues
(14,543 posts)as him looking out for his own bank account and screw those who make minimum wage, then I agree.
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)...as saying that the most important thing to do for America today is to balance the budget and reform entitlements. In other words, Catfood Commission 2.0, here we come!
SunSeeker
(51,726 posts)If you mean big C conservative, then yeah, he's a CONservative. But his cry against taxing the top marginal tax rate at 70% means he does not really give a shit about the national debt, just hording money into his bank account(s).
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)This move against him seems so anti-American, anti-democratic.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)The sooner he is pushed out the better for all of us.
Cha
(297,723 posts)Cha!
flea
Beausoleil
(2,845 posts)gaining public approval.
Ain't happening so he might as well get lost now.
catbyte
(34,458 posts)this nation is at stake. We cannot let ANY republican win in 2020, whether the nominee is that thing currently infesting the White House or some other horror show.
Nope. I'm with Barney Fife on this one.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)second. If what you say is true, and I 100% agree, why wouldn't we
run someone that is the most likely to win? Why wouldn't we run someone
with the best chance of winning TX and Ga and AZ? The purplish places. And let the rest of the country (sans TN, AL, KY, WV, etc) fall in line? I live in red TX and sexism is rampant still (for this generation anyway). Not that a woman couldn't win, but it, IMHO, is unlikely.
Guess my point is, if the most important thing is to make sure Trump or
some other repuke dickhead doesn't win - why not go more center left? someone who we know is sympathetic to the cause and will sign progressive legislation? win-win
catbyte
(34,458 posts)laziness. If he was truly serious, he would seek the Democratic nomination and not run a lazy, bullshit third party "campaign" which is usually just one long infomercial. Primaries are where you really get down in the trenches and slog out policy differences and candidates are forced to defend their positions and policies. It's where their character really comes through. He's decided to skip all of that, instead just spout whatever he wants without being challenged on anything. He'd been a major supporter of the Democratic arty for years. Why the change all of a sudden? I don't buy his "both sidesism". He wants the job without doing the work. Nope.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)donated to Dems. Go figure.
But, still don't get the part about wanting to dump trump, above all other motives, and not thinking more on the lines of Dem moderate - to insure victory and hopefully flip a couple purples. This makes so much sense to me, from the core of my leftist being.
gibraltar72
(7,512 posts)no one is asking.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Neema
(1,151 posts)about how Schultz running wasn't that big a deal and Nate Silver thinks it won't make a difference. Uh, yeah, maybe if everything were on the up and up with the election. But since we know Russia and the GOP will be joining forces to throw the election again, I don't think we can afford to take any chances.
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)Although he would seem to have zero appeal to progressives, Im not sure how many people might be influenced if he decides to leverage his companys power. I would expect that youll soon see copies of his new book at every Starbucks in the country. If we see stores filled with his attractively-presented messaging through the election season, he may be able to pull in just enough voters for another popular/electoral vote split, with a similar outcome.
Neema
(1,151 posts)the rules, not involve foreign powers, not suppress votes, not take advantage of gerry-mandering and fear-mongering. But we know they are going to do all those things. And if there's one thing the CEO of Starbucks knows about, it's marketing. Unlike 45, he actually knows how to build a brand and a business. I don't think that will make him a good president, especially since he thinks he doesn't have to pay his fair share in taxes, among other things. But it could make him a very attractive candidate to a Starbucks customer who isn't particularly political and buys into all the the "both sides need to get it together" bullshit that the media puts out.
Joediss
(84 posts)I never bought much of his over priced coffee anyway
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)He knows Trump will do everything possible to not only protect his billions, but make sure the taxpayers will add to them. I wouldn't be surprised if more billionaires will try this stunt.
catbyte
(34,458 posts)trying to convince us that only he knows best how to fix the clusterfuck that another out-of-touch (alleged) billionaire with no government experience has created. After all, the last vanity campaign went so well.
Give me a goddamned break.
Cha
(297,723 posts)dalton99a
(81,599 posts)when there is so much at stake.
Cha
(297,723 posts)from all the crap that got us to this point.:story: