Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 01:38 PM Jan 2019

I've never seen such a constant and vitriolic blast of "GFY" like there is in Schultz's Twitter feed

I've never seen so many f-bombs, I've never seen so many tweets with the hashtag #DontRunHoward.

It seems like the only person who wants him to run, other than Schultz himself, is Trump.

I see three reasons for this (or some combination of them all):

1). He's fucking stupid

2). He's fucking arrogant

4). He's as fucking needy as Trump, and wants to hold his own MAGA rallies

5). He knows EXACTLY what he's doing, and WANTS to aid Trump by siphoning off Dem votes.

I hope this clown show ends soon. Fuck this guy.

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I've never seen such a constant and vitriolic blast of "GFY" like there is in Schultz's Twitter feed (Original Post) Miles Archer Jan 2019 OP
He's uberwealthy and is simply clueless. Living in a hermetically sealed bubble of ego. NRaleighLiberal Jan 2019 #1
6. He sold the Sonics. nolabear Jan 2019 #2
That was him??? leftieNanner Jan 2019 #3
Sold them to an extreme right-winger, and lied the whole way through. LisaM Jan 2019 #13
And his coffee is sour. nolabear Jan 2019 #24
Yes i could MFM008 Jan 2019 #26
grrrrrr the driveway happybird Jan 2019 #50
Seattle's been full of FTG toward Howie for a dozen years... regnaD kciN Jan 2019 #32
The more I hear about this guy the less worrid I am about him split the Democratic vote standingtall Jan 2019 #4
+1 ooky Jan 2019 #22
True, but... regnaD kciN Jan 2019 #35
I think he must have gotten panic stricken when people started suggesting taxing people who actually Vinca Jan 2019 #5
But taxing them only after their first 70 Million. lunatica Jan 2019 #16
It's astonishing how many people who are merely comfortable think Uncle Sam would take 70% ... Hekate Jan 2019 #34
Yes, that is what scares me about universal health care. Absofuckinglutely I am for Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2019 #46
The other countries have near 100% participation for funding. oldsoftie Jan 2019 #48
I hear you. I need to research, because I don't know the answer, Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2019 #52
Not a Coincidence this happened after the latest Davos.n/t MarcA Jan 2019 #19
As I noted above... regnaD kciN Jan 2019 #36
Don't underestimate the power Apollyonus Jan 2019 #6
I think its number 5 marlakay Jan 2019 #7
We should strategize for that possibility ANYWAY. calimary Jan 2019 #8
I suspect Cosmocat Jan 2019 #14
An attention whore. That's who. Iggo Jan 2019 #18
he's totally freaked out that he might have to pay more taxes, so he decides "fuck all" to CharleyDog Jan 2019 #9
I love the video of the guy yelling at him. panader0 Jan 2019 #10
That's a lot of people's first impression of him now. Gore1FL Jan 2019 #49
I hope he wastes a lot of money and doesn't get on enough ballots. Nitram Jan 2019 #11
It's glorious. sarcasmo Jan 2019 #12
Schultz is just another Trump. marble falls Jan 2019 #15
OT ... but that gif in your signature! happybird Jan 2019 #51
When Trump gets me down, I'll watch for a minute or so and I get a recharge. marble falls Jan 2019 #56
He's fiscally conservative which is one good reason he shouldn't run. nt yaesu Jan 2019 #17
If you mean fiscally conservative mercuryblues Jan 2019 #28
I mean "fiscally conservative"... regnaD kciN Jan 2019 #37
There's nothing "fiscally conservative" about not taxing the rich. SunSeeker Jan 2019 #57
As much as I don't want him to run for sure, no way Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2019 #20
It's quite the opposite. Standing up to power is very American. fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #25
Nancy on Howard Schultz.. Cha Jan 2019 #42
+1 fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #43
.. Cha Jan 2019 #47
Part of the democratic process is Beausoleil Jan 2019 #30
Under normal circumstances, yes. But these are extraordinarily dangerous times. I truly feel that catbyte Jan 2019 #38
I agree. Still think it's somehow not right. But, forget about that for a Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2019 #44
What ticks me off about Schultz is his presumptiousness and, frankly, his arrogance and catbyte Jan 2019 #45
Yup - he's an asshole. And for years Starbucks was a very blue company that Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2019 #53
The answer to a question gibraltar72 Jan 2019 #21
All of the above. zentrum Jan 2019 #23
I'm so glad to see this post. Yesterday there was a whole thread Neema Jan 2019 #27
The big question is "can he siphon away as many votes as Johnson and Stein together"...? regnaD kciN Jan 2019 #39
I would have no worries if I thought for one second that 45/the GOP would play by Neema Jan 2019 #40
Never spend money at Starbucks Joediss Jan 2019 #29
Of course he wants to aid Trump NastyRiffraff Jan 2019 #31
The last thing we need is another out-of-touch billionaire with no government experience catbyte Jan 2019 #33
Nancy Pelosi on Howard S.. Cha Jan 2019 #41
+1. And we can no longer take anything for granted dalton99a Jan 2019 #54
Precisely.. most of us have learned Cha Jan 2019 #55

leftieNanner

(15,160 posts)
3. That was him???
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 02:09 PM
Jan 2019

Oh, yes. FTG!

I'm a long time Warriors fan (even when they were crappy), but I always loved the Sonics.

But then there are lots of reasons to dislike Mr. Coffee

LisaM

(27,839 posts)
13. Sold them to an extreme right-winger, and lied the whole way through.
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 03:12 PM
Jan 2019

He also cut a private driveway to his house through a public park.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
32. Seattle's been full of FTG toward Howie for a dozen years...
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:42 PM
Jan 2019

And, if you’re wondering why he’s chosen to run, he says it’s because of AOC and her eeeeeevil proposal to tax the rich. Seriously.


standingtall

(2,787 posts)
4. The more I hear about this guy the less worrid I am about him split the Democratic vote
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 02:23 PM
Jan 2019

because he might as well be a tea party republican.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
35. True, but...
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:48 PM
Jan 2019

...I worry that, by October 2020, every Starbucks in the country will have turned into a de facto campaign stop.

Vinca

(50,310 posts)
5. I think he must have gotten panic stricken when people started suggesting taxing people who actually
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 02:23 PM
Jan 2019

have money. Better to bleed Grandma's Social Security.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
16. But taxing them only after their first 70 Million.
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 03:23 PM
Jan 2019

Hopefully they can tighten the old belt and live within those poverty level meager means!

Hekate

(90,829 posts)
34. It's astonishing how many people who are merely comfortable think Uncle Sam would take 70% ...
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:43 PM
Jan 2019

...of their earnings, or 70% of all they've got, or whatever. I have a former neighbor who thinks like that. He operates a small blue collar business and inherited some apartments and the house he lives in. I know his wealth tops a couple million only because real estate in this region is insanely high in value. That's not his income, though. And $70 million might as well be on the moon.

But, taxes bad.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
46. Yes, that is what scares me about universal health care. Absofuckinglutely I am for
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 08:54 PM
Jan 2019

it....but if you lead with that, you will 100% lose TX (My POV = turn TX blue).

I know other countries have it - but I don't know how they came to have it. Is there a way to commit to it in some kind of incremental basis/phase in? Definitely think it will be harder to go from a capitalist/private for profit straight to universal. Just have never heard anyone discuss this. And, say you phase in a segment, then that will have an averse affect on the for-profit premiums since their pool will be smaller.

oldsoftie

(12,615 posts)
48. The other countries have near 100% participation for funding.
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 09:21 PM
Jan 2019

They have a consumption tax along with the income tax.
The US depends on almost all revenue from income taxes. And nearly 1/2 of us pay nothing in income taxes.

Yes, I beat the dead horse on consumption taxes. Because I see SO much income that doesnt get taxed. And even the fantasy of a 70% tax on income over 70 million or 10 million STILL wont raise enough to get us there.

We MUST do whats needed to at least stop people from going bankrupt just because they got sick.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
52. I hear you. I need to research, because I don't know the answer,
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 10:29 PM
Jan 2019

what the genesis of universal care was in those countries who have it. Watching one of Michael Moore's documentaries about Scandinavia and what a great place that is - how they care for their less fortunate, and their sick, it made me wonder. What is it and what is it about a country where the majority care so much.

I am probably really jaded since I now live in deep red country, but I don't see the people around me ever, in a generation at least, caring about the masses, like it seems it is so innate elsewhere.

My point is, I think there must be a much more effective way to present an approach for universal healthcare than the big bang - "not-for-profit" care - for a country where many don't care about others and is used to for-profit systems.

I am not thinking about myself - I am 100% for it - just being pragmatic - how you sell it, how you phase it in - logistically.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
36. As I noted above...
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:49 PM
Jan 2019

...he has officially said that he was spurred to run by the threat of AOC and her tax plan.

 

Apollyonus

(812 posts)
6. Don't underestimate the power
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 02:30 PM
Jan 2019

of instant sycophants who want to reduce the weight of a billionaire's wallet.

marlakay

(11,498 posts)
7. I think its number 5
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 02:33 PM
Jan 2019

He is afraid if a left leaning person gets in they will take away a bunch of his money in taxes.

Unfortunately I think out of selfishness he is going to go all the way so we are going to have to find the votes to beat a third party also.

Cosmocat

(14,574 posts)
14. I suspect
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 03:17 PM
Jan 2019

it is going to be a pretty miserable experience for him, and who wants to put up with that for two years ...

CharleyDog

(758 posts)
9. he's totally freaked out that he might have to pay more taxes, so he decides "fuck all" to
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 03:05 PM
Jan 2019

America, it's worth it for money, "my money, my beautiful money."

panader0

(25,816 posts)
10. I love the video of the guy yelling at him.
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 03:08 PM
Jan 2019

"Egotistical billionaire asshole."
Of course he was escorted out.

Gore1FL

(21,152 posts)
49. That's a lot of people's first impression of him now.
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 09:37 PM
Jan 2019

As I see it, that call-out was a direct-hit. He's defined.

happybird

(4,634 posts)
51. OT ... but that gif in your signature!
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 10:20 PM
Jan 2019
I had never seen that version before.
It's been a rough day and I really needed a big laugh. Thank you.

mercuryblues

(14,543 posts)
28. If you mean fiscally conservative
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:30 PM
Jan 2019

as him looking out for his own bank account and screw those who make minimum wage, then I agree.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
37. I mean "fiscally conservative"...
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:51 PM
Jan 2019

...as saying that the most important thing to do for America today is to balance the budget and “reform entitlements.” In other words, Catfood Commission 2.0, here we come!

SunSeeker

(51,726 posts)
57. There's nothing "fiscally conservative" about not taxing the rich.
Wed Jan 30, 2019, 03:40 PM
Jan 2019

If you mean big C conservative, then yeah, he's a CONservative. But his cry against taxing the top marginal tax rate at 70% means he does not really give a shit about the national debt, just hording money into his bank account(s).

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
20. As much as I don't want him to run for sure, no way
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 03:49 PM
Jan 2019

This move against him seems so anti-American, anti-democratic.

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)
25. It's quite the opposite. Standing up to power is very American.
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:24 PM
Jan 2019

The sooner he is pushed out the better for all of us.

Beausoleil

(2,845 posts)
30. Part of the democratic process is
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:34 PM
Jan 2019

gaining public approval.

Ain't happening so he might as well get lost now.

catbyte

(34,458 posts)
38. Under normal circumstances, yes. But these are extraordinarily dangerous times. I truly feel that
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:55 PM
Jan 2019

this nation is at stake. We cannot let ANY republican win in 2020, whether the nominee is that thing currently infesting the White House or some other horror show.

Nope. I'm with Barney Fife on this one.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
44. I agree. Still think it's somehow not right. But, forget about that for a
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 08:04 PM
Jan 2019

second. If what you say is true, and I 100% agree, why wouldn't we
run someone that is the most likely to win? Why wouldn't we run someone
with the best chance of winning TX and Ga and AZ? The purplish places. And let the rest of the country (sans TN, AL, KY, WV, etc) fall in line? I live in red TX and sexism is rampant still (for this generation anyway). Not that a woman couldn't win, but it, IMHO, is unlikely.

Guess my point is, if the most important thing is to make sure Trump or
some other repuke dickhead doesn't win - why not go more center left? someone who we know is sympathetic to the cause and will sign progressive legislation? win-win

catbyte

(34,458 posts)
45. What ticks me off about Schultz is his presumptiousness and, frankly, his arrogance and
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 08:36 PM
Jan 2019

laziness. If he was truly serious, he would seek the Democratic nomination and not run a lazy, bullshit third party "campaign" which is usually just one long infomercial. Primaries are where you really get down in the trenches and slog out policy differences and candidates are forced to defend their positions and policies. It's where their character really comes through. He's decided to skip all of that, instead just spout whatever he wants without being challenged on anything. He'd been a major supporter of the Democratic arty for years. Why the change all of a sudden? I don't buy his "both sidesism". He wants the job without doing the work. Nope.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
53. Yup - he's an asshole. And for years Starbucks was a very blue company that
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 10:36 PM
Jan 2019

donated to Dems. Go figure.

But, still don't get the part about wanting to dump trump, above all other motives, and not thinking more on the lines of Dem moderate - to insure victory and hopefully flip a couple purples. This makes so much sense to me, from the core of my leftist being.

Neema

(1,151 posts)
27. I'm so glad to see this post. Yesterday there was a whole thread
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:29 PM
Jan 2019

about how Schultz running wasn't that big a deal and Nate Silver thinks it won't make a difference. Uh, yeah, maybe if everything were on the up and up with the election. But since we know Russia and the GOP will be joining forces to throw the election again, I don't think we can afford to take any chances.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
39. The big question is "can he siphon away as many votes as Johnson and Stein together"...?
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:58 PM
Jan 2019

Although he would seem to have zero appeal to progressives, I’m not sure how many people might be influenced if he decides to leverage his company’s power. I would expect that you’ll soon see copies of his new book at every Starbucks in the country. If we see stores filled with his attractively-presented messaging through the election season, he may be able to pull in just enough voters for another popular/electoral vote split, with a similar outcome.

Neema

(1,151 posts)
40. I would have no worries if I thought for one second that 45/the GOP would play by
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 05:36 PM
Jan 2019

the rules, not involve foreign powers, not suppress votes, not take advantage of gerry-mandering and fear-mongering. But we know they are going to do all those things. And if there's one thing the CEO of Starbucks knows about, it's marketing. Unlike 45, he actually knows how to build a brand and a business. I don't think that will make him a good president, especially since he thinks he doesn't have to pay his fair share in taxes, among other things. But it could make him a very attractive candidate to a Starbucks customer who isn't particularly political and buys into all the the "both sides need to get it together" bullshit that the media puts out.

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
31. Of course he wants to aid Trump
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:39 PM
Jan 2019

He knows Trump will do everything possible to not only protect his billions, but make sure the taxpayers will add to them. I wouldn't be surprised if more billionaires will try this stunt.

catbyte

(34,458 posts)
33. The last thing we need is another out-of-touch billionaire with no government experience
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:42 PM
Jan 2019

trying to convince us that only he knows best how to fix the clusterfuck that another out-of-touch (alleged) billionaire with no government experience has created. After all, the last vanity campaign went so well.



Give me a goddamned break.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've never seen such a co...