General Discussion

originalpckelly

(24,382 posts) Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:33 PM Jan 2012

Part of me is glad Bachmann won't be near the white house, but I am sad.

Once again, there won't be a woman on the ballot at the top this year.
No, Governor Romney, anatomically incorrect Ken Dolls do not count.

It's just annoying. No offense black guys, but you aren't half of the population. If someone was going to come first, statistically speaking, it should have been a woman.

Fuck you America.

Yeah, I'm a guy, I don't give a shit about that though. It's not right. Kids of both genders should be able to dream about being President, without it being a bunch of bullshit.

What are we to say when half of the country is female and not once has there been a woman as president.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Part of me is glad Bachmann won't be near the white house, but I am sad. (Original Post) originalpckelly Jan 2012 OP

So you would settle for Bachmann because she is a woman? SunsetDreams Jan 2012 #1

Nobody should be elected based on their genitalia. dems_rightnow Jan 2012 #2

You forgot to add that by not having Bachmann running we lost a clown that kept us laughing Sarah Ibarruri Jan 2012 #3

gasp! she would have made a Terrible president. Whisp Jan 2012 #4

Unrec. nt Kahuna Jan 2012 #5

I would love a woman to be on the ballot; however.. LynneSin Jan 2012 #6

SunsetDreams

(8,571 posts)

1. So you would settle for Bachmann because she is a woman?

Reply to originalpckelly (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:39 PM

Jan 2012

She wants to control what I do with my body, but by golly gee at least we have a woman president.

Screw that.

dems_rightnow

(1,956 posts)

2. Nobody should be elected based on their genitalia.

Reply to originalpckelly (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:45 PM

Jan 2012

Bachmann is a horrible candidate, despite having a vagina.

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)

3. You forgot to add that by not having Bachmann running we lost a clown that kept us laughing

Reply to originalpckelly (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:56 PM

Jan 2012

uproariously.

Whisp

(24,096 posts)

4. gasp! she would have made a Terrible president.

Reply to originalpckelly (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 02:00 PM

Jan 2012

what the fuck are you thinking? she would have made it absolutely miserable for the people you care for around you. She's a fundy nutcase asshole, wake up! *splashes ice water on pckelly's face.

Kahuna

(27,311 posts)

5. Unrec. nt

Reply to originalpckelly (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 02:36 PM

Jan 2012

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)

6. I would love a woman to be on the ballot; however..

Reply to originalpckelly (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 02:38 PM

Jan 2012

I will not compromise my womanhood by putting batshit crazy idiot females on the ballots that 'look pretty' but about as smart as a bucket of rocks.

Hillary Clinton impresses me, so does Barbara Boxer, Elizabeth Warren, Kathleen Sebelius and a host of other women.

People like Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin make me cringe because they embarss women in general.

GOP put women on the ballots because they hope women will vote with their ovaries and not their brains. Democrats put Women on the ballot because they are smart intelligent people that anyone would want to elect.

Reply to this discussion