Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,071 posts)
Sat Feb 2, 2019, 09:27 PM Feb 2019

Analysis: How Declaring a National Emergency Could Hurt Some Republicans

A national emergency declaration from President Trump could create a problem for some Senate Republicans.

Many Republicans have made no secret of their distaste for an emergency declaration, which the president has asserted he may declare to build a border wall if he is unsatisfied with a congressional compromise on border security. Not only would the move likely get tied up in the courts, but Republicans worry that such a strong display of executive authority could establish a troubling precedent when a Democrat occupies the White House.

More immediately, though, an emergency declaration could force Senate Republicans to take an unsavory vote on opposing the emergency declaration. Under the law governing national emergencies, Congress can vote to terminate the emergency. If the Democratic House were to pass a resolution terminating the emergency, the Senate would likely have to vote on it.

For many Senate Republicans, especially those running in competitive re-election races this cycle, voting on such a resolution would leave no desirable option. On the one hand, voting against the resolution would give Democrats another opportunity to paint the vulnerable Republicans as lackeys to Mr. Trump in states where he is not popular. On the other, voting for the resolution to terminate the emergency — and bucking Mr. Trump — could anger the GOP base and potentially invalidate the emergency declaration.

In short, vulnerable Senate Republicans hoping to quietly distance themselves from the president, while not visibly opposing him, could be out of luck.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-how-declaring-a-national-emergency-could-hurt-some-republicans/ar-BBT2Y57?li=BBnbcA1

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Analysis: How Declaring a National Emergency Could Hurt Some Republicans (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2019 OP
That would be a difficult position for Senate republicans, which is why Brawndo Feb 2019 #1
Wipe Out!!!!! Wellstone ruled Feb 2019 #2
I love it! :) LiberalFighter Feb 2019 #3
If he declares an emergency, they will disapprove it for the record but they won't override his veto dalton99a Feb 2019 #4

Brawndo

(535 posts)
1. That would be a difficult position for Senate republicans, which is why
Sat Feb 2, 2019, 09:36 PM
Feb 2019

McTurtle would not allow it to come to a vote on the Senate floor even if the House passed it. It's just like the House approved spending bill, I think he would treat it the same way. Can't go on the record and risk consequences, right?

dalton99a

(81,534 posts)
4. If he declares an emergency, they will disapprove it for the record but they won't override his veto
Sat Feb 2, 2019, 10:28 PM
Feb 2019

so his declaration will stand

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Analysis: How Declaring a...