Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConnecticut state rep proposes 50% ammo tax increase
Good for her- but, the responses to her are almost all RW trolls declaring their love for their guns and ammo. She defeated a 12 term incumbent Democrat in the primaries last year, so kind of a local AOC
Link to tweet
text of her tweet
Ive introduced HB 5700, a 50% tax increase on ammunition. It doesnt apply to military or law enforcement. Im hearing push back about the need to protect one's home... but how much ammunition does someone really need to do that? #gunsense #enough
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 561 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Connecticut state rep proposes 50% ammo tax increase (Original Post)
NewJeffCT
Feb 2019
OP
Renew Deal
(81,869 posts)1. We don't need gun control. We need bullet control
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)2. exactly
I remember that skit
Hotler
(11,443 posts)3. Take away the ammo and the gun is just a paper weight. nt
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)4. In theory to defend your home you also need to practice shooting ...
Might be a good idea to offer the exemption to Gun Ranges (as long as there's good oversight wherein Range owner can only sell discounted bullets to people using them on-site).
That takes away one of the reasonable counter-arguments ...
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)6. I could see that working
gun range owners get an exemption, but I'd also say that ammo purchased there needs to be accounted for as either being spent or returned to the gun range.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)7. That's pretty much what I was getting at with the oversight comment :) (nt)
LiberalFighter
(51,044 posts)5. My thought too. Don't worry about gun control. Just restrict ammo use.
sarisataka
(18,755 posts)8. Lots of legal quicksand
Around that and if it passed would likely be struck down