General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy the news is useless now.
To start with I'm not knocking the news. There are good news outlets and bad ones but its important to remember they are working in a system that they are not free to abandon. That system is the ratings system and they need that to make money. Ratings are just people saying "I like this". Most people don't like things that are difficult to think about. Think about 10 people you know. How many of them would rather watch CSPAN over a cute kitten video. Now think about 10 people and how many would rather watch something outrageous about their opposite political party over watching CSPAN. It works for both sides, this constant outrage and tribalism. It works on most of us. Even my favorite media person (Maddow) does this. Yes Dump is outrageous but we give him power when we let this outrage overcome us. A good example of this would be "Walls are immoral". A wall cant be moral or immoral. Its a wall. What an absolutely silly concept. On the other side we have numerous examples that are far too many to mention. People aren't thinking, they are reacting. The news has trained us to do this on both sides. This is not bothsiderism at all. Our side may have "walls are immoral" but they have "lock up kids and adults who are requesting asylum". Its not the what but the why that matters and the why is because our news is useless now because we are addicted to the conflict and that sells more than anything else. Dont let yourself be controlled like this.
Eko.
manor321
(3,344 posts)This is why so many of us started switching to online blogs and independent sources in the early 2000s.
Having said that, I would add that Rachel's show and Lawrence's show on MSNBC are almost miraculous, in the sense that they are (mostly) good despite the horrible environment they have to function in.
But nothing can compete with reading online and learning from subject experts about particular news stories.
Eko
(7,342 posts)Is talking about this exact thing.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)and I don't need to spell it out.
Eko
(7,342 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)Eko
(7,342 posts)Not too many people would work for free and that is how the system has been set up for a while now.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)the 6 o'clock news was not set up as a money maker. It was to deliver information to the people.
And that's the way it is.
Eko
(7,342 posts)We should go back to that.
many a good man
(5,997 posts)Back when broadcasting on the public airwaves was the only game in town, broadcasters were required to devote so many hours per week to public interest programming as a condition of their license because the airwaves belonged to the American people. We also had the Fairness Doctrine that encouraged both sides of every issue got airtime.
News programming was done as part of their public interest obligation. Sometime in the '80s greedy executives wanted to turn it into a profit center like their entertainment programming. Less news and more "human interest" segments were offered to increase viewership and ad revenues. News became less informative. Revocation of the Fairness Doctrine opened the door for right wing radio and TV.
The American public "owns" the broadcast airwaves (because the spectrum is limited) but it doesn't own cable. Cable was all private investment so government cannot require public interesting programming or other regulations.
Outrage sells so that's where we are now. I am grateful that Rachel and others shine a light on the current disaster but have to admit they sensationalize from time to time to keep viewers hooked just like Fox News does. I blame all media for getting us into the mess we are in now.
bdamomma
(63,919 posts)we can go to get fact based news. Right now for me is Ari, Rachel and Lawrence. Our media is terrible during campaign years, they don't go far enough to call people out. But then again we got other news sources Washington Post, NY Times, BBC news.
True people are reacting and not thinking. Some people that is. Manipulation and brainwashing are key components.
Eko
(7,342 posts)And it proved my point 100%. I'm not going to go meta so if you have questions pm me.
Eko.
VOX
(22,976 posts)Television news used to be run at an expense to the networks for providing a public service.
That scenario is now completely flipped. Money drives it, and it shows.
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)For example - Santorum on CNN. He's a regular Trump water carrier and the stuff he says is just absurd. Other regulars may try to call him on it, then there's arguing and confusion and Santorum just laughs. He's on the CNN payroll and he gets away with it.
That's not news.
Yes factual news gets reported, but that's not dramatic.