Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,730 posts)
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 05:15 PM Aug 2012

Newsmax: Krugman, Others Slam Newsweek's Ferguson


http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/krugman-ferguson-newsweek-sullivan/2012/08/21/id/449297

Tuesday, 21 Aug 2012 04:58 PM

By Henry J. Reske

Newsweek’s eyebrow-raising cover story on President Barack Obama headlined, “Hit the Road, Barack: Why We Need a New President," is coming under fire from “liberal bloggers” questioning conclusions reached and facts presented.

Author and historian Niall Ferguson has been savaged in postings by Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, in a lengthy fact check by the Atlantic magazine, Andrew Sullivan and writers from Slate, Salon, and Mother Jones among others.

In a post of his own on The Daily Beast, Ferguson attributes the ire to “liberal bloggers.”

“My critics have three things in common,” he wrote. “First, they wholly fail to respond to the central arguments of the piece. Second, they claim to be engaged in ‘fact checking,’ whereas in nearly all cases they are merely offering alternative (often silly or skewed) interpretations of the facts. Third, they adopt a tone of outrage that would be appropriate only if I had argued that, say, women’s bodies can somehow prevent pregnancies in case of ‘legitimate rape.’

FULL story at link.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newsmax: Krugman, Others Slam Newsweek's Ferguson (Original Post) Omaha Steve Aug 2012 OP
newsmax? bwahahahahahaaaa spanone Aug 2012 #1
Andrew Sullivan is not remotely a liberal. n/t Fumesucker Aug 2012 #2
Hard to say what he is anymore. hifiguy Aug 2012 #4
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #3
Taxes have been cut repeatedly since your idol Ronnie Reagan in the 1980s. denverbill Aug 2012 #5
Flat tax is RW fairytale. part man all 86 Aug 2012 #6
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
4. Hard to say what he is anymore.
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 05:55 PM
Aug 2012

"Traditional conservative" seems the best descriptor - as in what conservatives were 40-50 years ago. He sure as hell isn't a radical reactionary like today's pukes. He is generally worth a read, though, and can disagree with people in a measured and civil fashion. He is backing Obama again this election and thinks the Repig party is an open air nuthouse.

Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)

denverbill

(11,489 posts)
5. Taxes have been cut repeatedly since your idol Ronnie Reagan in the 1980s.
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 05:58 PM
Aug 2012

The problem isn't that spending is going up so much. It's that taxes have gone down so much.

My guess is you never uttered a peep when GWB started 2 wars, a unfunded Medicare drug program, and cut taxes twice without ever cutting spending to pay for the tax cuts.

Back in REAL America, we used to raise taxes if a war was worth fighting. We didn't borrow money from our grandchildren to pay for tax cuts for ourselves, and we didn't start new programs without paying for them.

part man all 86

(367 posts)
6. Flat tax is RW fairytale.
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 06:01 PM
Aug 2012

You will still need the IRS to collect it and someone like me(makes around 9,000/yr) would actually pay more than Rmoney percentage wise. Forbes has been pushing this BS for years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Newsmax: Krugman, Others ...