General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy the attack on our cameraman was no surprise
I would really love to be able to say when I heard about the attack on our cameraman Ron Skeans that I was surprised. Or shocked even. I wasn't.
Once I found out that he was OK, and that the rest of the team were OK, I thought this was a pretty unsurprising event. What is shocking is that my reaction should be like that - because surely it can never be right that a person going about doing their job, in a country which cherishes the First Amendment and the rights of a free press, is pushed to the ground. But it is an incident that's been coming for a long time.
Before we get to that, let me say a word about Ron Skeans. Ron is the only one of our camera-people to have a "hard pass" that gives you direct access to the White House estate. I have a hard pass too. That means more or less whenever I am broadcasting live outside the White House, I am working with Ron.
He is the kindest, politest, most decent, patriotic man you could wish to meet. Frankly, there are a few cameramen that I've worked with over the years that are argumentative, provocative and generally belligerent. None of those adjectives could be applied to Ron.
He and I did a report together on Rolling Thunder, the day in Washington when thousands of bikers converge on the city to commemorate those missing in action in Vietnam or who'd been taken as POWs.
I rode my motorbike, he rode pillion on another to film the event. We were both slightly overwhelmed by the patriotism and emotion of the day. He is a proud son of Ohio - where like in most American families there were those of his relatives who supported Trump in 2016, and those who didn't.
The idea that someone would attack Ron is frankly preposterous. He's the wrong guy. But of course it wasn't Ron that was being attacked.
To the drunken lout in the red Make America Great Again hat at the Trump rally, who bravely attacked him from behind while he was looking through the 12lbs (5kg) of camera on his tripod and couldn't see him, that didn't matter.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47219957
Sneederbunk
(14,298 posts)SoCalNative
(4,613 posts)He should be identified and shamed into oblivion.
Harker
(14,033 posts)when (if) he's charged with some form of assault.
I hope that will be soon.
louis-t
(23,297 posts)Expect more from the asshat brigade.
Wounded Bear
(58,698 posts)louis-t
(23,297 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Trump's doing it, characters like Richard Spencer are doing it.
They're doing the same thing that Osama Bin Laden did, and that Anwar al-Awlaki. Yeah, they were cowards. Kept their own hands clean - the vast majority of their crimes constituted inciting others to do the dirty work for them. Except they did it in Arabic. And we responded with less patience. Bin Laden sleeps with da fishes, and al-Awlaki got turned into fine red mist.
Where's a Predator drone when we need one?
kairos12
(12,869 posts)Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)From wikipedia
Not a lawyer but that seems difficult to prove based on a single case. Are there steps the media as a group could document and complain about his incitement that would enable a state AG to file a case?
Maybe wishful thinking but this is a dangerous ride were on.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Right in front of him.
After he's openly instigated it and said things like offering to pay for lawyers to defend assholes that get violent against protesters or the press.
I know, we have a First Amendment fetish, but there's a reason why many countries will put people in jail for incitement.
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)Just wondering if there are steps media groups could take to make it easier to get past the imminent violence test. Like multiple complaints directed at trump or an injunction. Again not a lawyer.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Locrian
(4,522 posts)They started chanting "let him go" (the attacker) then "trump, trump, trump"
It's what they love and they equate that with trump. This is the rise of facisim and terrorism in the US
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)His events have mob aspects to each one. This is not a crowd, it is a mob.
IronLionZion
(45,516 posts)but white people can't be terrorists.
SDJay
(1,089 posts)and perhaps sooner, someone is going to get killed at one of these hatefests. I shudder to think that, but honestly, can anyone look at what's happening and not at least think it's increasingly possible?
Then what?
This is terrifying on so many levels it's impossible to articulate all of them.
It's also depressing that there's no way it's going to stop. Does anyone see Dump cooling the rhetoric? Of course not - it's a big applause bit, and that's all he's after, serious injury or death be damned.
DirtEdonE
(1,220 posts)"...the drunken lout in the red Make America Great Again hat at the Trump rally, who bravely attacked him from behind while he was looking through the 12lbs (5kg) of camera on his tripod and couldn't see him"
I want to tell you a short story. I was working in the warehouse, outside the office one day, routing the New England runs for the next morning when a kid who worked in production ran up behind me and pushed me as hard as he could from behind right between my shoulder blades. I never saw or heard him coming.
I have no idea what his problem was. A few days later, while loading patio doors (about 100 pounds per panel) onto a trailer, I felt an intense burning between my shoulder blades. The pain was unbearable. I rested until the pain subsided then completed loading the trailer.
That was around 1982/3. I worked like for another twenty years. Before they found out I had a compression fracture of my spine - a broken back literally, in 2003 while getting MRI's after an idiot crashed into my truck at full speed while I was stopped that wrecked my cervical and lumbar spine.
I urge the photographer to get an MIR ASAP and sue the shit out of the magat that attacked him from behind.
Mr.Bill
(24,317 posts)a serious boycott of any coverage of these events.