General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat if Clump declares a national emergency and takes SNL off air?
Link to tweet
?
Verified account
@realDonaldTrump
Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
More
Nothing funny about tired Saturday Night Live on Fake News NBC! Question is, how do the Networks get away with these total Republican hit jobs without retribution? Likewise for many other shows? Very unfair and should be looked into. This is the real Collusion!
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)on the take anything is possible.
MaryMagdaline
(6,856 posts)onenote
(42,768 posts)MaryMagdaline
(6,856 posts)onenote
(42,768 posts)I'll give you 100-1 odds. If Trump declares a national emergency and tries to shut down SNL, I'll donate $100 to DU. If he doesn't, you donate $1.
MaryMagdaline
(6,856 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)htuttle
(23,738 posts)I can't think of any actual way he could do that.
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)they kept censoring and Tommy got more and more creative to get around them...then BAM..cancelled.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)htuttle
(23,738 posts)There's a studio they usually use, but that can be anywhere, especially for a show like SNL. There's no TV transmitter involved. It gets streamed over the net (or over satellite link) to affiliates in local markets who do the broadcasting.
And if he thinks he gets bad press now, lol...
tavernier
(12,406 posts)and get away with it?
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)LBJ got Smothers Brothers cancelled as they were critical of his VN War...oh I cried that day...
Croney
(4,670 posts)RWNJs!
Soxfan58
(3,479 posts)lindsey graham will try to have Senate hearing. Call Lorne Michaels, and Alex Baldwin before his committee.
onenote
(42,768 posts)If it happens, I'll donate $100 to DU. It it doesn't you donate $1 to DU.
Deal?
keithbvadu2
(36,923 posts)New Poll: 43% of Republicans Want to Give Trump the Power to Shut Down Media
Freedom of the press may be guaranteed in the Constitution. But a plurality of Republicans want to give President Trump the authority to close down certain news outlets, according to a new public opinion survey conducted by Ipsos and provided exclusively to The Daily Beast.
So that 43% would approve a democrat shutting down Fox news?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-poll-43-of-republicans-want-to-give-trump-the-power-to-shut-down-media?via=twitter_page
CrispyQ
(36,526 posts)It's OK If You Are Republican.
I think their hypocrisy has worn me down the most over the years, how members & supporters of the GOP & the media don't see how fucking hypocritical they are in how they report on dems vs. repubs.
area51
(11,922 posts)CrispyQ
(36,526 posts)It's infuriating.
brooklynite
(94,740 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)onenote
(42,768 posts)Answer: NONE.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934
onenote
(42,768 posts)magicarpet
(14,175 posts).... and have one of his Nazi Fascist nincompoops bomb the SNL - NBC studios in New York.
Then proclaim he does not in sight or condone violence in any way, shape, or form.
ProfessorGAC
(65,199 posts)Way too cowardly to do a hit, and he isn't an earner.
He's a pretend mobster, because the outfit would never have him.
FakeNoose
(32,773 posts)... most of them don't even watch SNL (my guess) and the ones who do, wouldn't want the show cancelled.
We give way too much leverage to the "base" anyway. It's time we stop doing that.
Just sayin'
magicarpet
(14,175 posts)Shoot first... then ask questions later.
onenote
(42,768 posts)The National Emergencies Act allows the president to declare a national emergency and on that basis, can take certain actions under the terms of around 100 statutory provisions that expressly refer back to the NEA.
Get back to me when you locate the statutory provision that addresses shutting down a specific television program.
Thank goodness the folks filing legal challenges to the president's action know how the law works and aren't making arguments based on the kind of nonsensical hyperbole in the OP.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)(c) Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of
war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order
to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it
necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for
such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all
stations or devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations within the
jurisdiction of the United States as prescribed by the Commission, and may cause
the closing of any station for radio communication, or any device capable of
emitting electromagnetic radiations between 10 kilocycles and 100,000
megacycles, which is suitable for use as a navigational aid beyond five miles, and
the removal therefrom of its apparatus and equipment, or he may authorize the use
or control of any such station or device and/or its apparatus and equipment, by any
department of the Government under such regulations as he may prescribe upon just compensation to the owners. The authority granted to the President, under this
subsection, to cause the closing of any station or device and the removal therefrom
of its apparatus and equipment, or to authorize the use or control of any station or
device and/or its apparatus and equipment, may be exercised in the Canal Zone
onenote
(42,768 posts)First of all, nothing in Section 706(c) allows the president, in the event of a national emergency, to shut down a single program on a single broadcast network.
Second,706(g), contains the following limitation on the president's authority under 706(c) as follows:
(g) Nothing in subsection (c) or (d) shall be construed to authorize the President to make any amendment to the rules and regulations of the Commission which the Commission would not be authorized by law to make; and nothing in subsection (d) shall be construed to authorize the President to take any action the force and effect of which shall continue beyond the date after which taking of such action would not have been authorized.
littlemissmartypants
(22,819 posts)Communications Act of 1934
By Roosevelt Institute | 09.01.10
http://rooseveltinstitute.org/communications-act-1934/
Written and passed during FDRs first term, the Communications Act of 1934 consolidated existing radio, television, and telephone regulations and created the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to oversee all interstate and foreign communications. It was intended to streamline the regulatory process and expand affordable access to communication services.
The bill also established regulatory standards for various types of communications, including Title I services, which are subject to looser restrictions, and Title II services, which fall under more rigorous common carrier rules intended to protect equal access to these networks.
Whats the significance?
As communications networks came to occupy a more prominent role in American society, the FCCs influence grew along with them. Throughout its history, it has often provoked controversy due to its efforts to police obscene content, which some see as a violation of free speech. In 1996, the Telecommunications Act amended the 1934 law in an attempt to bring it up to date with modern technology. However, critics noted that the new law also weakened ownership rules designed to prevent the growth of telecom monopolies.
Currently the FCC is at the center of the debate over net neutrality. In 2002, it ruled that most forms of broadband Internet access did not qualify as telecommunications services, and were therefore not subject to Title IIs common carrier regulations. Supporters of net neutrality, who believe that the Internet must be kept free and equally accessible to everyone, argue that the FCC should establish new regulations to include broadband Internet services or that Congress should pass another law to expand the FCCs authority.
Whos talking about it?
Sarah Nathan explained how the regulations established in 1934 led to the current battle over net neutrality Leslie Harris argued that the current limits on the FCCs jurisdiction are an anachronism Adam Cohen reminded us that the 1934 law grants the president the power to shut down all communications (including the Internet!) in a time of war The FCC drew criticism for its own net neutrality guidelines Senator Maria Cantwell wants to add net neutrality principles to the Communications Act.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)(c) Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of
war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order
to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it
necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for
such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all
stations or devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations within the
jurisdiction of the United States as prescribed by the Commission, and may cause
the closing of any station for radio communication, or any device capable of
emitting electromagnetic radiations between 10 kilocycles and 100,000
megacycles, which is suitable for use as a navigational aid beyond five miles, and
the removal therefrom of its apparatus and equipment, or he may authorize the use
or control of any such station or device and/or its apparatus and equipment, by any
department of the Government under such regulations as he may prescribe upon just compensation to the owners. The authority granted to the President, under this
subsection, to cause the closing of any station or device and the removal therefrom
of its apparatus and equipment, or to authorize the use or control of any station or
device and/or its apparatus and equipment, may be exercised in the Canal Zone
onenote
(42,768 posts)bluestarone
(17,052 posts)With this congress who's to stop him? He could do it and let the court fight about it.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Go pull out the wires by himself?
Explain the physical steps he would take.
littlemissmartypants
(22,819 posts)Would definitely start a war. Highly counterproductive and counterintuitive for a wannabe dictator, imo. What's next? Book burning? The kiddies are going to love that. Definitely war making material. No Tee Vee*, no books and throw in no fast food and I think you'll have a winner.
* I'm including blocking the www, which of course would disrupt banking, gaming, commerce and love letters to Vlad, just to mention a few of the affected components under the "Tee Vee" umbrella, by the way.
I'd like to see him go for it. Talk about a mutiny. I doubt there's enough popcorn in the universe. But won't cable guys be in high demand. Sure glad I still have my short wave radio.
ETA: Just think how crazed he'll be if he actually has nothing to do but listen to the voices in his head? I'd buy tickets for that.
littlemissmartypants
(22,819 posts)We are the Bread & Puppet Theater because we offer good old sourdough rye bread together with a great variety of puppetshows, some good, some not so good, but all for the good and against the bad. The art of puppetry helps women, men and children alike to overcome the established order and the obsessive submission to its politics and consequent brutalities.
Peter Schumann
The Bread and Puppet Theater was founded in 1963 by Peter Schumann on New York Citys Lower East Side. Besides rod-puppet and hand puppet shows for children, the concerns of the first productions were rents, rats, police, and other problems of the neighborhood. More complex theater pieces followed, in which sculpture, music, dance and language were equal partners. The puppets grew bigger and bigger. Annual presentations for Christmas, Easter, Thanksgiving and Memorial Day often included children and adults from the community as participants. Many performances were done in the street. During the Vietnam War, Bread and puppet staged block-long processions and pageants involving hundreds of people.
In 1974 Bread and Puppet moved to a farm in Glover in the Northeast Kingdom of Vermont. The 140-year old hay barn was transformed into a museum for veteran puppets. Our Domestic Resurrection Circus, a two day outdoor festival of puppetry shows, was presented annually through 1998.
The company makes its income from touring new and old productions both on the American continent and abroad, and from sales of Bread and Puppet Press posters and publications. The traveling puppet shows range from tightly composed theater pieces presented by members of the company to extensive outdoor pageants which require the participation of many volunteers.
Today, Bread and Puppet continues to be one of the oldest, nonprofit, self-supporting theatrical companies in the country.
Creative Commons License
This work by Bread and Puppet Theater is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Bread and Puppet Theater
753 Heights Rd
Glover, Vt 05839
802-525-3031
For questions about the following:
Booking, puppetsecretary@gmail.com
Bread & Puppet Museum, call Elka Schumann at (802) 525-6972
Apprenticeship, estelibesteli@gmail.com
I highly recommend them.
handmade34
(22,758 posts)NYC...
Gothmog
(145,595 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
Paladin
(28,275 posts)I mean, it's one thing to lie, cheat, steal and use the U.S. Constitution as toilet paper to wipe shit out of his huge butt in the midst of his morning tweets---but fuck around with SNL? Hey, that's serious.
(satire, but not really)
MaryMagdaline
(6,856 posts)Unfortunately for them, theres no electoral college for TV ratings
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,866 posts)because RWers aren't funny. What passes for humor in their world consists of insults and slurs. They punch down. Being mean isn't funny, even if they think it is.
ProfessorGAC
(65,199 posts)Every joke would be "He lied about something and the liberals are sad."
Laughter would not abound when it's the same bit over & over!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Remember that lame "Half hour news hour" or whatever it was they produced a couple of a few years back?
That was like watching a wreck on the freeway.
handmade34
(22,758 posts)they are not funny... no competition
MaryMagdaline
(6,856 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)It's comedy you stupid fucktard! Are you so thin skinned that you can't even take a joke? Every other president and prominent politician has been mocked on SNL and none of them ever threw a tantrum over it. He is such a weak, hypersensitive little candy ass!
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,793 posts)Congress will put its foot down and there will be marching in the streets like never before seen.
Gothmog
(145,595 posts)Gothmog
(145,595 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,866 posts)Suppressing speech is what dictators do.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,866 posts)because you disagree with their political messaging? Or were you being sarcastic in the first place and I missed it?