does that have relevance to firing Mueller, or not firing him.

I don’t think Trump is appointing people to protect the GOP per se. Every action he takes is solely for his own benefit. If the GOP gets protected it’s just by chance.

It’s because of there questions that I’m posting here.

appointing people who are giving him the "we'll protect ya boss", but we've seen little evidence that they do it when they get in there....Berman and Whitaker are but two examples. If it comes down to Trump or the GOP, I'm confident Barr will choose his party over this interloper.

Steven Miller. Though I’ll give them credit for being evil, I’m not so sure they’re deeply knowledgeable about the law.

And the fact his appointees haven’t fired Mueller is probably because once appointed they’re filled in on the laws and realize they can go to jail for being accessories.

I’m becoming more and more convinced our government is being run by some people who aren’t very savvy about the legalities in place. They’re more prone to thinking on mobster levels of how to break or circumvent the law.

My example is Trump himself. No matter how many times he gets sued by the states he just keep doing the same thing. So far not all the king’s men or all the king’s horses have been able to make him change his modus operandi, and to continue the analogy, he’s perilously close to falling off his Wall.