Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(65,490 posts)
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 11:13 PM Feb 2019

Ken Dilanian has a questionable past as a reporter (too cozy with the CIA):

L.A. Times Disowns Reporter Outed as a CIA Collaborator
09/05/2014 10:53 am ET Updated Dec 06, 2017

Recently released emails indicate that prominent national security reporter Ken Dilanian — formerly with the Los Angeles Times, currently with the Associated Press (and from 1997-2007 the Philadelphia Inquirer) — shared stories prior to publication with CIA press office seeking their approval, according to a story up on The Intercept. Now, it is not uncommon for national security reporters to vet facts with government functionaries, but the emails indicate Dilanian went much further than that, not only sharing stories prior to publication (a big no-no in almost every newsroom) but he also entered into discussions about how the CIA could bend public opinion of drone strikes their way.

On at least one occasion he re-wrote a lede as per their dictates. He also reported as fact, in the pages of the Los Angeles Times, a CIA claim that there was no collateral murder in a 2012 drone strike on Al Qaeda leader Abu Yahya al-Libi. An Amnesty International report disputes that sanitized version of events, citing eyewitnesses that claim upwards of 15 people, including Afghan tribesmen unaffiliated with Al Qaeda, were killed in the drone strike. Obviously, a drone strike that only kills the bad guys is much more palatable to the American people than a drone strike that kills 15. But that’s not journalism, that’s propaganda.

There’s no telling how much of his national security reporting was compromised by the CIA press office, or for how long, because the emails only cover a few months in 2012. The emails were released by the CIA as per a FOIA request by The Intercept for Agency email exchanges with journalists. Dilanian acknowledges sending stories to the CIA prior to publication and now says it was wrong. It was also in violation of the L.A. Times’ ethical guidelines. Perhaps that explains why the L.A. Times misleadingly refers to Dilanian as a “Tribune reporter” in its reporting on the scandal (SEE ABOVE). Tribune Publishing is the L.A. Times’ parent company. However, Dilanian’s Linkedin page clearly says he was a Los Angeles Times reporter (SEE BELOW). Shameful all around. This is not a good day for journalism.


Short article--no more at link.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-valania/la-times-disowns-reporter_b_5770388.html
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ken Dilanian has a questionable past as a reporter (too cozy with the CIA): (Original Post) tblue37 Feb 2019 OP
And? Me. Feb 2019 #1
He pushes the ideas that there is no sign of collusion and that Mueller is wrapping tblue37 Feb 2019 #2
Hmmmm Me. Feb 2019 #3
I heard him reacting that way right after the document came out, pnwmom Feb 2019 #6
Dilanian offered commentary without DeminPennswoods Feb 2019 #7
I thought the same thing when I heard him this afternoon. He also pushed the investigation., uponit7771 Feb 2019 #8
And....he's fucking horrible manor321 Feb 2019 #4
Yes I saw that too. OnDoutside Feb 2019 #9
I'm not happy with Dilanian lately, but I'd hesitate to believe anything pushed by the Intercept. pnwmom Feb 2019 #5

tblue37

(65,490 posts)
2. He pushes the ideas that there is no sign of collusion and that Mueller is wrapping
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 11:27 PM
Feb 2019

up now, without finding that much against Trump.

He seems to have an agenda.

pnwmom

(109,000 posts)
6. I heard him reacting that way right after the document came out,
Sun Feb 24, 2019, 12:38 AM
Feb 2019

but later today he seemed to be walking his initial reaction back.

Still, I agree with you. It wasn't a good analysis.

DeminPennswoods

(15,290 posts)
7. Dilanian offered commentary without
Sun Feb 24, 2019, 12:43 AM
Feb 2019

fully reading the document. This is what happens when you do that.

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)
8. I thought the same thing when I heard him this afternoon. He also pushed the investigation.,
Sun Feb 24, 2019, 12:48 AM
Feb 2019

... will be ending soon bulshit

 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
4. And....he's fucking horrible
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 11:38 PM
Feb 2019

Today he showed up on MSNBC grinning from ear to ear pushing the bullshit propaganda that because Mueller's sentencing memo for the D.C. case doesn't mention the word "Russia", it means Mueller has found no conspiracy of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia.

Joyce Vance and Ben Wittes politely implicitly corrected him later, after Ken's segment was over.

pnwmom

(109,000 posts)
5. I'm not happy with Dilanian lately, but I'd hesitate to believe anything pushed by the Intercept.
Sun Feb 24, 2019, 12:36 AM
Feb 2019

That's the Glenn Greenwald publication. Greenwald is the libertarian who was heavily involved in the Ed Snowden debacle. Greenwald isn't a progressive, he opposes progressives.

Even filtered through the HuffPost, this is still an Intercept story.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ken Dilanian has a questi...