Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(269,028 posts)
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 05:28 PM Feb 2019

Nuclear Winter From an India-Pakistan War Could Kill 2 Billion-Jeff Masters

https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/Nuclear-Winter-India-Pakistan-War-Could-Kill-2-Billion?cm_ven=cat6-widget
<snip>
As nuclear-armed India and Pakistan engage in military clashes over the disputed Kashmir region, consider that a “limited” nuclear war between them is capable of causing a catastrophic global nuclear winter that could kill two billion people. The inevitable wars and diseases that would break out could kill hundreds of millions more.
A 2008 paper by Brian Toon of the University of Colorado, Alan Robock of Rutgers University, and Rich Turco of UCLA, "Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War", concluded that a war between India and Pakistan using fifty Hiroshima-sized weapons with 15-kiloton yield on each country, exploded on cities, would immediately kill or injure about forty-five million people. However, the final toll would be global and astronomically higher, according to recent research.

The most recent study of the environmental aftermath of a nuclear conflict, Mills et al. 2014, Multidecadal global cooling and unprecedented ozone loss following a regional nuclear conflict, used an Earth system climate model including atmospheric chemistry, ocean dynamics, and interactive sea ice and land components, to investigate a limited nuclear war where each side detonates fifty 15-kiloton weapons over urban areas—less than half of the existing arsenals of the approximately 140 warheads each that India and Pakistan have. These urban explosions were assumed to start 100 firestorms. Firestorms are self-feeding fires that suck air into themselves and generate immense columns of rising smoke which lofts into the stratosphere, where it spreads globally. The model predicted the smoke would block enough sunlight for the Earth to experience the coldest temperatures since the last ice age, thousands of years ago.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

theophilus

(3,750 posts)
1. But it would solve the Climate Crisis, re Global Warming. I guess the rich monsters
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 05:31 PM
Feb 2019

could sit it out in their bunkers cheering for the destruction of all of us poor folks. I am being sarcastic, obviously. But I sometimes wonder if the rich don't have such a scheme up their ermine sleeves. Maybe people are just stupid enough to pull the nuclear trigger. I hope we just pop em all off. I would sooner be vaporized than starving to death with all those around me. I am selfish, though.

padah513

(2,503 posts)
2. Do we even have ambassadors in those two countries?
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 05:45 PM
Feb 2019

Have ambassadors to any countries been appointed in this administration? Other than the obvious ones to Trump's friends and donors.

angrychair

(8,699 posts)
6. Our Diplomatic corps has been gutted
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 06:04 PM
Feb 2019

My two cents:
Our relationship with India is tenuous, at best, and we have little to no diplomatic leverage.

Our relationship with Pakistan has always been based around either fear (economics) or money (bribery) but that is unlikely to be effective in this case.

China or Russia likely have far better negotiating power here. China claims part of Kashmir but that doesn't necessarily work in their favor here as both India and Pakistan want all of it.

This isn't the first time there has been fighting between these two but that doesn't mean this time might not be the last time.
Pakistan is the smaller and the only one heavily influenced by religious radicals of the three and therefore the most likely to use a nuke to level the playing field a little.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
7. Yes - and amzingly they are both qualified!
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 06:07 PM
Feb 2019
Washington Reacts As Trump Nominates New U.S. Ambassador To India
Sep 14, 2017, 11:55pm

President Trump has nominated Kenneth Juster, a top White House official with deep India experience, to serve as U.S. ambassador to India. The post has been vacant since January after Ambassador Richard R. Verma stepped down as chief of the U.S. mission in New Delhi following Trump’s inauguration. Juster’s nomination is a welcome move by President Trump, whose foreign policy thus far has generated uncertainty among U.S. allies and within the broader international community.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ronakdesai/2017/09/14/washington-reacts-as-trump-nominates-new-u-s-ambassador-to-india/#7a267d31f423


New US ambassador to Pakistan assumes charge
September 25, 2018

ISLAMABAD - The new US diplomat to Pakistan, Paul Jones, began his assignment as the Chargé d’Affaires at the United States Embassy Monday with a resolve to work with the new government of Pakistan.

<SNIP>

Ambassador Jones is a career member of the State Department’s Senior Foreign Service. He served as Ambassador to Poland from 2015 to 2018. Previously, he was the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs (2013-2015), Ambassador to Malaysia (2010-2013), and Deputy Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan while concurrently Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for South Asian Affairs (2009-2010). He has served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Manila, the U.S. Mission to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and at the U.S. Embassy in Skopje, Macedonia.
https://nation.com.pk/25-Sep-2018/new-us-ambassador-to-pakistan-assumes-charge



TheBlackAdder

(28,207 posts)
3. There were a thousand nuke detonations, a couple hundred above ground, including Russia's Tsar!
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 05:48 PM
Feb 2019

.

How many hundreds of nukes are they going to set off, when they only have several dozen?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba




.

Sapient Donkey

(1,568 posts)
13. That's insane. I had no idea there were that many nuclear tests
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 07:23 PM
Feb 2019

And for some reason I was always under the impression that the major powers stopped large scale testing during the 60's. No idea where I developed that idea from. Time to go spend a few hours reading up on this.

NickB79

(19,247 posts)
14. We're discussing nuclear strikes on cities, not Pacific atolls or deserts
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 07:43 PM
Feb 2019

Nuclear winter isn't caused directly by the nuclear explosions. It is caused by the burning of entire cities following the explosions with such intensity that massive amounts of dark soot is lofted into the stratosphere. This soot is what blocks sunlight and cools the planet.
It explained as much in the OP.

Nuclear tests in unpopulated areas or underground isn't comparable.

And beyond that, 100-150 nukes each, many considerably larger than the 15-kt estimate used in this study, isn't a few dozen.

NickB79

(19,247 posts)
17. Are you confusing nuclear winter with nuclear fallout now?
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 02:18 AM
Mar 2019

Nuclear winter is the term for a GLOBAL cooling event caused by clouds of soot and ash entering the stratosphere, encircling the globe, and blocking sunlight.

angrychair

(8,699 posts)
4. This is absurd
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 05:53 PM
Feb 2019

Billions of people are going to die for a plot of land the size of Kansas?!?

The absurdity of our life and times us mind numbing.

angrychair

(8,699 posts)
8. Past history tends to agree
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 06:10 PM
Feb 2019

That said, the wrong move or threat or push, is all it takes to bring that house of cards down.

Pakistan is the smaller of the three landowners in terms of population and military and has religious radicals influencing policy. They would seem the most likely to resort to a "final" solution on the issue to level their playing field.

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
9. fair enough.
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 06:20 PM
Feb 2019

i still feel like they might WANT to nuke India, but their nukes probably don't work anymore.


former9thward

(32,017 posts)
11. The OP is absurd.
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 07:02 PM
Feb 2019

And not based on any science. People would die in in India and Pakistan if their nukes still worked but nowhere else.

ck4829

(35,077 posts)
18. The wage of nationalism is death
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 02:27 AM
Mar 2019

India is run by nationalists of the BJP, Pakistan also has nationalists, and I would even say Islamist groups in the country are as nationalist as they are religious.

This is what nationalism has gotten us before in World War 2, this is what nationalism will get us again in the future.

SQUEE

(1,315 posts)
10. No.
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 06:21 PM
Feb 2019

That is not how this really works.

A limited exchange by these two countries, and that is all they are able to have BTW, would not equal the St Helens eruption in 1980.

Luckily, they have decided not to find out.

sarisataka

(18,660 posts)
12. I have to question the conclusion
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 07:17 PM
Feb 2019

In the heyday of nuclear testing there were many years of 50+ nuclear explosions. Many of those explosions were far greater than 50 times the Hiroshima bomb, some greater than 1000 times.

If those tests didn't cause any appreciable effects to the weather it is difficult to see how a smaller limited would have greater impact on the weather.

Also I believe they seriously overestimate the effect of the firestorms. They seem to assume each bomb would create a firestorm yet neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki experienced large firestorms after the atomic bombs.

NickB79

(19,247 posts)
15. 1945 Hiroshima isn't comparable to a modern city in composition
Thu Feb 28, 2019, 07:50 PM
Feb 2019

Last edited Sat Mar 2, 2019, 02:19 AM - Edit history (1)

How many millions of tons of flammable plastic, oil, rubber and asphalt are found in every modern city?

Also on edit: Hiroshima did in fact see a firestorm: http://www.atomicarchive.com/Effects/effects11.shtml

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nuclear Winter From an In...