Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse judiciary targets 81 individuals and entities in Trump corruption, obstruction probe.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 784 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House judiciary targets 81 individuals and entities in Trump corruption, obstruction probe. (Original Post)
triron
Mar 2019
OP
triron
(22,006 posts)1. Here is the full list:
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)3. Why isn't Ivanka on this list? nt
triron
(22,006 posts)4. She is probably on another committee's list.
fierywoman
(7,684 posts)5. List starts w/ #3, goes 'til 37, resumes next column @ 42, goes to 79, so not quite complete.
Ivanka probably is between 38-41.
yonder
(9,666 posts)6. Or Sarah H. Sanders. Spicey's there but no Sarah.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,015 posts)2. What a list! Wish Turtle was on it...but..WOW!
ooky
(8,924 posts)7. No Hannity?
Danascot
(4,690 posts)8. Donald Trump may have just Schitt himself
quote from the Palmer Report
Vinca
(50,276 posts)9. I was listening to a discussion on CNN about this and John King must have
wondered aloud 6 or 7 times if Democrats are "overreaching." Does anyone remember a discussion of Republicans "overreaching" after the 20th or 30th Benghazi hearing??????