Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NRaleighLiberal

(60,015 posts)
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 09:24 AM Mar 2019

A friend posed this question at lunch yest. - if we could only have ONE in 2020 - POTUS, or Senate

(assuming we keep the house) - which would you choose?

My answer - all three of our answers, actually - was that if we could choose only one outcome, it would be the majority in the senate.

Thoughts?

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A friend posed this question at lunch yest. - if we could only have ONE in 2020 - POTUS, or Senate (Original Post) NRaleighLiberal Mar 2019 OP
My first thought is, yes? Polly Hennessey Mar 2019 #1
Agree.... Heartstrings Mar 2019 #2
My brain might say the senate but... jcgoldie Mar 2019 #3
Your heart is actually right. Your brain needs to rethink it. scheming daemons Mar 2019 #6
No, POTUS... by far scheming daemons Mar 2019 #4
Well, if we took the Senate and Trump somehow got through, he could be effectively impeached. hlthe2b Mar 2019 #5
Taking the Senate isn't enough.... we'd have to get to 67 seats. scheming daemons Mar 2019 #7
Agree hlthe2b Mar 2019 #8
Probably POTUS OliverQ Mar 2019 #9
The President if... Delmette2.0 Mar 2019 #10
President is most important - think of next SCOTUS nominee!!!!!! lark Mar 2019 #11
Senate. Hugin Mar 2019 #12
2/3 majority in the Senate. lagomorph777 Mar 2019 #13
Without a second thought, POTUS. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2019 #14
 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
6. Your heart is actually right. Your brain needs to rethink it.
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 09:48 AM
Mar 2019

Think about the biggest problems we are facing.

Climate Change? A new President gets us back in the Paris Accord immediately and begins working with other nations.

Immigration? A new President ends "kids in cages" on day one, and puts an end to the silly wall.

Economy? A new President names a new Treasurer to replace Mnuchin, a new Labor secretary, a commerce secretary.

Election Security? A new President puts a new Attorney General in place, staffs the DOJ, prioritizes the CIAs mission.

Foreign Affairs? A new President makes new trade deals, revives old partnerships and alliances, holds Putin to task.


A new Senate, but with Trump still in place...... none of the above happens. At *BEST* a new Senate can simply thwart Trump naming new judges. That's a very valuable thing, but it is much less important than the powers of the Presidency.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
4. No, POTUS... by far
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 09:36 AM
Mar 2019

The POTUS has so much more direct power over important things. Especially with respect to our dealings with other nations.... that it is FAR more important - and it is not even close - to hold the Presidency than to hold the Senate.


- The ability to start or stop military engagements (war)

- The ability to negotiate trade deals

- Things like the Paris Accord

- Putting in place the heads of every cabinet department, that directly impacts our lives. The state department, The FBI, the CIA, the Dept of Education, the Pentagon.... ALL of these, staffed by the President.


I can't believe this is really a question. The Presidency is much more important than the Senate.


Think about Neilson as the head of DHS! You want to stop kids in cages? You want to stop the wall? A new President ends that on the first day in office.

Think about DeVos as the head of Education!

Think about who is the Attorney General!

Think about who is the Secretary of State!



I'm actually dumbfounded that people think holding the Senate is more important than holding the Presidency.

hlthe2b

(102,292 posts)
5. Well, if we took the Senate and Trump somehow got through, he could be effectively impeached.
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 09:47 AM
Mar 2019

That said, Trump is causing too much damage to our international reputation and with his unilateral (unconstitutional) acts, domestically too. There are not enough courts or time to reign him in.

So, I tend to think it a close call.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
7. Taking the Senate isn't enough.... we'd have to get to 67 seats.
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 09:49 AM
Mar 2019

Which isn't happening.

Taking the Presidency is FAR more important.

 

OliverQ

(3,363 posts)
9. Probably POTUS
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 09:51 AM
Mar 2019

Even if we had the majority in the Senate, we're unlikely to have the 67 needed to remove Trump, so he'd still be in office. And he'd still veto every bill passed by the Democratic Congress.

The only benefit to the Senate is blocking anymore judicial nominations. But, a Democratic POTUS would solve that problem too since they'd never appoint a Republican judge. And the POTUS has more independent ability to improve things than the Senate would.

lark

(23,105 posts)
11. President is most important - think of next SCOTUS nominee!!!!!!
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 11:03 AM
Mar 2019

Besides if this SCOTUS approves drumpf's move that presidents can take any action they want as long as they call it a national emergency, the next Dem president can unilaterally implement effective reasonable gun controls, implement climate control, national day off for voting in all national elections, medicare for all, negotiating for Medicare drug prices, and they won't be able to stop him.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
14. Without a second thought, POTUS.
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 11:06 AM
Mar 2019

We have a literal madman in the office. That cannot be allowed to stand.

This is unprecedented in American history.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A friend posed this quest...